Definitely keep up with the Questioning More™, Edward.
But normies or not, the Yaplakal post you quote is right:
“The main question here is this: if this whole theater of security doesn’t protect us at all, then why is it needed at all? Why do we need these metal detectors-checks-questions-x-rays and police patrols on every corner? …
“In general, it is clear what will happen now. Tightening, tightening the screws …”
What happened and who did it matter, but regardless of those answers, the response to the failure of costly, dehumanizing, spirit-strangling security measures will certainly be (once again) to impose more of them.
Curious that a terrorist attack in Moscow allegedly committed by the Ukraine (or ISIS, whatever) with more than 130 victims receives even less twitter attention than the death of Navalny or the Kate Middleton thing whatever it was. As if the respected alt media or influencers or whatever sense that better not talk about this.
Very informative. I am from Slovakia. In Slovakia we had many false flag operations, dead of Kuciak, killing at tepláreň - Bratislava gay club, in Czech republic it was David Kozak. Many police mistakes, they at first went to wrong building, despite that they repeatedly localized mobile phone of Kozak. When some false flag operation are happen, there are many police mistakes. But when you wrote something on internet, police is in your home at few minutes... Global games, where leaders collaborate and citizens are victims.
The arson part always confused me the most, even from the get-go. It seems rather absurd for anything other than a medieval wooden church to go up in flames that quickly and that intensely, even IF there were no automatic firefighting systems in place. What the hell was burning? I mean, specifically, what materials? The roof tiles? The insulation? Wiring? Very odd.
As for the rest, I can understand some being due to incompetence (i.e. fire doors sealed shut), laziness (security guards sleeping on the job), and greed, but... why the cops so slow to react? Why did it take so long to get the APB out on the vehicle? Why, why why... and that's not even going into why someone agreed to train (and get paid for) how to shoot up a venue full of unarmed civilians and NOT expect to be martyred on the spot.
Please, do keep asking questions. Even if we think you're a nut (the Purim connection is a huuuuge stretch, for instance), it's better than just taking everything at face value.
Seymour Hersh -never one to be pressurised by being first and first to be wrong- weighs in:
DUTY TO WARN: When invoked, they require specific information about an imminent terrorist attack to be forwarded to vulnerable and threatened nations, including Russia and Ukraine. The US duty-to-warn obligation even extends to other potential adversaries such as Iran, with that government having a similar obligation to warn all. The requirement doesn’t include operations run by either nation.
This American intelligence community passed a warning of a possible attack involving religious extremists from Pakistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan eighteen days in advance of the Moscow concert hall assault that killed at least 137 people and injured more than one hundred. Such a warning invariably comes from intercepts from the National Security Agency and agent reports from the Central Intelligence Agency.
The Americans did their job but the Russian intelligence community, heeding its boss, did not. President Vladimir Putin publicly called the warning “provocative statements” three days before the attack, and the Russian security services ignored it. They bear responsibility, in the view of American intelligence experts, for failing to do what was necessary to protect the concertgoers."
Well, all of these questions presuppose the attack happened, whereas your previous post seemed to be angling toward the idea there was no attack. You know, just like Alex Jones and Sandy Hook massacre. :)
Re/ fire suppression mechanism: the building's fire suppresion mechanism (sprinklers) isn't guarrantied to put out any kind of a fire. No sprinkler system is guarrantied to do that. Instead if the fire is small enough it will work but if the fire is big enough, it won't. So you pile a bunch of chairs next to a wooden or plastic wall, throw a molotov at them and you have the nucleus of the fire that the sprinklers can't put out. And the fire spreads to the wall, goes up and ignites the roof, which is probably made from tar and plastic. The roof is above the sprinklers so it doesn't matter what the sprinkers do. And all of this is assuming you're igniting things in places where there are sprinklers.
Furthermore, all of these questions presuppose there was no concomitant cyber attack. If there was a cyber attack on Crocus, it might have been able to supress the fire supression system.
And as for the slow police, the police seem always be slow in these mass shootings. In USA the police tends to be late too. Maybe they just get caught on the loo? Or else it takes time to put on battle gear. After all, it's not every day that you have imminent warning of a terrorist attack, so the gear is probably in the locker.
There are no surprise terror attacks for two simple reasons:
1) secret services are extremely efficient since, at least, the end of the 19th century; they infiltrate the sh*t of everything and know everybody's whereabouts.
2) you can kill people by the tens of thousands, not sh*tty hundreds, without even the need to be in the place you want to strike: you just need a car, a pressured cannister of the right stuff, a nozzle, a driver. You would even be on the other side of the border of your choice before sh*t even starts to happen. Nobody does this because secret services only agree on low grade attacks because they are the only kind that are politically useful (look what Israel can do thank to the last Hamas move) and painless on a large scale (didn't you notice how much citizens are expendable?).
Why in a building where public events are regularly held:
▪︎ the evacuation of people and children was not organized?
▪︎ why were the emergency exits closed, the men breaking down the doors and finding blocked passages?
▪︎ why didn’t the lights go out, all sorts of flashlights continued to entertain both inside and outside while the Crocus was burning, and the safe emergency lighting didn’t turn on instead?
▪︎ why didn’t the fire extinguishing system, which is supposed to prevent a tragedy, work? After all, it wasn’t a paper mill that was burning, but an essentially empty building, where, in theory, there was nothing to burn.
▪︎ why did everything inside and the building itself burn so quickly, like a candle, should such things be finished and built only from non-combustible materials?
▪︎ why aren’t events attended by thousands of people guarded? […]
▪︎ why did the special forces enter Crocus only an hour later, when the terrorists had already left, especially considering that the distance from the Main Directorate of the Russian Guard in Moscow to the Crocus shopping center is only 4 minutes by car?
And another question:
how many people died at the hands of terrorists, and how many people suffocated or suffered burns due to the notorious corrupt failure to ensure fire safety and careless, economical construction?
Before the owner of the building, a billionaire, approves subsidies from the state for the restoration of Crocus, it would be worth asking him these questions.
And at the same time, to all the officials who cover up for non-compliance with fire safety standards too!"
Thank you for this more inside view of what happened in Moscow. I reflexively always question the official story regarding events such as this tragedy but I had not dug deeper into the specifics in this case. This sounds like it has all the markings of a PsyOp as per my checklist. There is no police presence, alarms and protocols are not working which maximizes casualties and are we dealing with a DEW weapon again? Maybe. They don't even try to hide what they're doing anymore do they?
I think it's usually a confluence of big players who all want a little piece of the action. I still can't fathom the purpose of all the security theater us global citizens are subjected to the world over if these guardians can just be told to stand down to facilitate mass slaughter
This is reminescent of the similar event that took place at the Bataclan theatre in Paris in 2015. At that, time a military force (Opération Sentinelle) that was even present in front of the Bataclan that evening, had been ordered not to intervene. Compared with those details given of the Crocus operation, we cannot think of a coincidence, but rather of a globalist operation organised and designed to generate a maximum of casualties, and this with the approval and support of the local government. Isis and its indoctrinated fanatics is a product or agency that finds its origin in Freemasonry where the salafist ideology was created. As Freemasonry not only controls the ideologies, but also all governments (Putin is affiliated to a Masonic lodge), I would think that this tragic event is for the Globalists a necessary episode in their quest for WW3, where Islam has been programmed to play an eminent role.
Thanks for bringing the questions together. No such thing as a stupid question, we were told in school. Questions are necessary for us to understand. Hopefully someone can answer them plainly, honestly and coherently. Everyday Russian people deserve this at least.
As an aside, Tucker's enthusiastic raving about how beautiful Moscow is and the interview with Putin peaked the interest of many a Westerner and then this.
Obviously Putin's "look over there. Ukraine, America" is an attempt to direct public attention away from the other questions that need to be asked. No doubt fire control system and building materials were substandard but the complete lack of any cops or security with weapons is a real give-away , this attack was allowed to happen .There were only four shooters and if it was the men who were captured I would venture to say they were amateurs.Three or four properly trained professionals could have terminated them quickly I would think. I have heard from two Russian bloggers who stated that they had been to events at that theatre in the past and there were always some armed police presence. That is absolutely standard now in the West and I would have thought that Russia in the midst of a war and after being warned about concert attacks would have had an armed presence outside and inside the theatre. I conclude the attack was allowed to take place, why , we will most likely see from Putin's final reaction. If it leads to another round of mobilisation then we know why. Many folk have said that Putin needed a big false flag to get support for further mobilisation and I am expecting this to be what is really going on. What Putin needs now is to provide absolute proof on Ukraine's involvement and then start the call up , that will shed light on the entire event.
As for the videos , the muzzle sparks still have me puzzled. I have yet to see a realistic explanation for them. I have watched a lot of video on real life weapon testing and never seen any thing like that. When blanks are fired they are loaded with varying amounts of material in order to increase muzzle flash for special effects but the flash still comes from the muzzle , the barrel , whereas these sparks seem to be coming from somewhere else like from the breech , very strange. The shooting out of the glass in the door as the shooter enters that part of the complex demonstrates that they were firing live rounds. Regarding the ISIS connection I suppose they might have just gotten lucky and dredged up these monkeys to do the job but usually they have there own men do the job and they don't run away , they stay and fight to the death or self destruct with explosives so as to get to the promised land of young virgins. The lack of suicide belts and the attempted escape by car does not fit their MO. So many anomalies abound on all sides but hopefully shit will get clearer as time passes. For myself a complete staging is just implausible as there is a cast of thousands and it is too hard to fake something this big and keep every person involved on script.
I'm still incredulous about all this. They actually pulled a WTC... They did a Larry Silverstein. And blamed it on "terrorists." But thanks to Slavsquat we are all quickly pulled back to earth from our fears about what is next. Now the "weird video" makes sense. The "terrorists" were planted to distract from the arson that was the main event that night. It goes to show that very wealthy people just don't give a damn about other people. But what will never be explained, and which really exposes the underbelly of the Russian hard mentality and "culture" is the fact that these 4 pitiful schnooks - the "terrorists" - were bludgeoned and tortured into "confessing" and that the sickening images of this torture were shamelessly distributed all over the internet for public display of how terrorists are handled in Russia. No form of due process, just personal and sadistic self-service by individuals who are in charge of law and order. Their actions are no different than those of the Crocus proprietors. The way the supposed perpetrators were treated is undermining the seemingly civilized attitudes by those that lead the nation, and is actually questioned more so than the reason for the "terrorist attack" itself - why is Russia suddenly allowing this torture to be so openly publicized? That's a question you will read in just about all the newspapers in western EU. To me, the hard and cold mentality that has characterized Russia for centuries, has not changed. I thought it had, but this proves me wrong. And how incredibly sad that not a single soul wonders about these four patsies that were going to pay the price for this greedy and murderous scam, as "islamist terrorists." Russia's response is terrorizing its own credibility as stronghold of newfound civilization. Slavsquat is a ray of light, keep shining the light!
Not to be a wet blanket, though, your "questions" yesterday were not. You implied in your observations of the events in the video that the attack was false/fake/staged/not real.
Your implications were received loud and clear by many commenters, who commented extensively on the "fakeness" of the scenes. Those commenters were clearly influenced by your insinuations of "fakeness."
So, keep asking questions--but, if you're so sensitive to feedback questioning your line of questions, you may want to pull back from the far edge of skepticism.
Definitely keep up with the Questioning More™, Edward.
But normies or not, the Yaplakal post you quote is right:
“The main question here is this: if this whole theater of security doesn’t protect us at all, then why is it needed at all? Why do we need these metal detectors-checks-questions-x-rays and police patrols on every corner? …
“In general, it is clear what will happen now. Tightening, tightening the screws …”
What happened and who did it matter, but regardless of those answers, the response to the failure of costly, dehumanizing, spirit-strangling security measures will certainly be (once again) to impose more of them.
Curious that a terrorist attack in Moscow allegedly committed by the Ukraine (or ISIS, whatever) with more than 130 victims receives even less twitter attention than the death of Navalny or the Kate Middleton thing whatever it was. As if the respected alt media or influencers or whatever sense that better not talk about this.
Very informative. I am from Slovakia. In Slovakia we had many false flag operations, dead of Kuciak, killing at tepláreň - Bratislava gay club, in Czech republic it was David Kozak. Many police mistakes, they at first went to wrong building, despite that they repeatedly localized mobile phone of Kozak. When some false flag operation are happen, there are many police mistakes. But when you wrote something on internet, police is in your home at few minutes... Global games, where leaders collaborate and citizens are victims.
Same M.O every time.
* Intelligence failures
* Security systems failures
* Safety systems failures
* Access to exits failures
* Police and First Responders failures
* Some cut-out terrorist group "claims responsibility"
* Victims never identified through official records
* Anomalies with video footage
* Anomalies with timelines and version of events
* Usually always at night
* Perps identified in record time (by convenient passports, or...dun, dun, dun...a "MANIFESTO")
* A Wikipedia entry created in record time
* And runs concurrent with a different-but-damaging (Government-related) inconvenient truth
It's all so old, cringe, and tiresome.
Poisoned popcorn for the plebs.
The arson part always confused me the most, even from the get-go. It seems rather absurd for anything other than a medieval wooden church to go up in flames that quickly and that intensely, even IF there were no automatic firefighting systems in place. What the hell was burning? I mean, specifically, what materials? The roof tiles? The insulation? Wiring? Very odd.
As for the rest, I can understand some being due to incompetence (i.e. fire doors sealed shut), laziness (security guards sleeping on the job), and greed, but... why the cops so slow to react? Why did it take so long to get the APB out on the vehicle? Why, why why... and that's not even going into why someone agreed to train (and get paid for) how to shoot up a venue full of unarmed civilians and NOT expect to be martyred on the spot.
Please, do keep asking questions. Even if we think you're a nut (the Purim connection is a huuuuge stretch, for instance), it's better than just taking everything at face value.
Thanks for all the new links.
The fire definitely needs to be examined.
Seymour Hersh -never one to be pressurised by being first and first to be wrong- weighs in:
DUTY TO WARN: When invoked, they require specific information about an imminent terrorist attack to be forwarded to vulnerable and threatened nations, including Russia and Ukraine. The US duty-to-warn obligation even extends to other potential adversaries such as Iran, with that government having a similar obligation to warn all. The requirement doesn’t include operations run by either nation.
This American intelligence community passed a warning of a possible attack involving religious extremists from Pakistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan eighteen days in advance of the Moscow concert hall assault that killed at least 137 people and injured more than one hundred. Such a warning invariably comes from intercepts from the National Security Agency and agent reports from the Central Intelligence Agency.
The Americans did their job but the Russian intelligence community, heeding its boss, did not. President Vladimir Putin publicly called the warning “provocative statements” three days before the attack, and the Russian security services ignored it. They bear responsibility, in the view of American intelligence experts, for failing to do what was necessary to protect the concertgoers."
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/duty-to-warn
Well, all of these questions presuppose the attack happened, whereas your previous post seemed to be angling toward the idea there was no attack. You know, just like Alex Jones and Sandy Hook massacre. :)
Re/ fire suppression mechanism: the building's fire suppresion mechanism (sprinklers) isn't guarrantied to put out any kind of a fire. No sprinkler system is guarrantied to do that. Instead if the fire is small enough it will work but if the fire is big enough, it won't. So you pile a bunch of chairs next to a wooden or plastic wall, throw a molotov at them and you have the nucleus of the fire that the sprinklers can't put out. And the fire spreads to the wall, goes up and ignites the roof, which is probably made from tar and plastic. The roof is above the sprinklers so it doesn't matter what the sprinkers do. And all of this is assuming you're igniting things in places where there are sprinklers.
Furthermore, all of these questions presuppose there was no concomitant cyber attack. If there was a cyber attack on Crocus, it might have been able to supress the fire supression system.
And as for the slow police, the police seem always be slow in these mass shootings. In USA the police tends to be late too. Maybe they just get caught on the loo? Or else it takes time to put on battle gear. After all, it's not every day that you have imminent warning of a terrorist attack, so the gear is probably in the locker.
There are no surprise terror attacks for two simple reasons:
1) secret services are extremely efficient since, at least, the end of the 19th century; they infiltrate the sh*t of everything and know everybody's whereabouts.
2) you can kill people by the tens of thousands, not sh*tty hundreds, without even the need to be in the place you want to strike: you just need a car, a pressured cannister of the right stuff, a nozzle, a driver. You would even be on the other side of the border of your choice before sh*t even starts to happen. Nobody does this because secret services only agree on low grade attacks because they are the only kind that are politically useful (look what Israel can do thank to the last Hamas move) and painless on a large scale (didn't you notice how much citizens are expendable?).
"And here a lot of questions arise:
Why in a building where public events are regularly held:
▪︎ the evacuation of people and children was not organized?
▪︎ why were the emergency exits closed, the men breaking down the doors and finding blocked passages?
▪︎ why didn’t the lights go out, all sorts of flashlights continued to entertain both inside and outside while the Crocus was burning, and the safe emergency lighting didn’t turn on instead?
▪︎ why didn’t the fire extinguishing system, which is supposed to prevent a tragedy, work? After all, it wasn’t a paper mill that was burning, but an essentially empty building, where, in theory, there was nothing to burn.
▪︎ why did everything inside and the building itself burn so quickly, like a candle, should such things be finished and built only from non-combustible materials?
▪︎ why aren’t events attended by thousands of people guarded? […]
▪︎ why did the special forces enter Crocus only an hour later, when the terrorists had already left, especially considering that the distance from the Main Directorate of the Russian Guard in Moscow to the Crocus shopping center is only 4 minutes by car?
And another question:
how many people died at the hands of terrorists, and how many people suffocated or suffered burns due to the notorious corrupt failure to ensure fire safety and careless, economical construction?
Before the owner of the building, a billionaire, approves subsidies from the state for the restoration of Crocus, it would be worth asking him these questions.
And at the same time, to all the officials who cover up for non-compliance with fire safety standards too!"
Thank you for this more inside view of what happened in Moscow. I reflexively always question the official story regarding events such as this tragedy but I had not dug deeper into the specifics in this case. This sounds like it has all the markings of a PsyOp as per my checklist. There is no police presence, alarms and protocols are not working which maximizes casualties and are we dealing with a DEW weapon again? Maybe. They don't even try to hide what they're doing anymore do they?
I think it's usually a confluence of big players who all want a little piece of the action. I still can't fathom the purpose of all the security theater us global citizens are subjected to the world over if these guardians can just be told to stand down to facilitate mass slaughter
This is reminescent of the similar event that took place at the Bataclan theatre in Paris in 2015. At that, time a military force (Opération Sentinelle) that was even present in front of the Bataclan that evening, had been ordered not to intervene. Compared with those details given of the Crocus operation, we cannot think of a coincidence, but rather of a globalist operation organised and designed to generate a maximum of casualties, and this with the approval and support of the local government. Isis and its indoctrinated fanatics is a product or agency that finds its origin in Freemasonry where the salafist ideology was created. As Freemasonry not only controls the ideologies, but also all governments (Putin is affiliated to a Masonic lodge), I would think that this tragic event is for the Globalists a necessary episode in their quest for WW3, where Islam has been programmed to play an eminent role.
https://ia601900.us.archive.org/16/items/albert-pike-letter-to-mazzini/Albert%20Pike%20Letter%20to%20Mazzini.pdf
The prophecy must be fulfilled to bring about the "messianic time" where we "will own nothing":
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/4511335/jewish/Gog-and-Magog.htm
Thanks for bringing the questions together. No such thing as a stupid question, we were told in school. Questions are necessary for us to understand. Hopefully someone can answer them plainly, honestly and coherently. Everyday Russian people deserve this at least.
As an aside, Tucker's enthusiastic raving about how beautiful Moscow is and the interview with Putin peaked the interest of many a Westerner and then this.
Now I’m wondering if Cinnabon did it
Obviously Putin's "look over there. Ukraine, America" is an attempt to direct public attention away from the other questions that need to be asked. No doubt fire control system and building materials were substandard but the complete lack of any cops or security with weapons is a real give-away , this attack was allowed to happen .There were only four shooters and if it was the men who were captured I would venture to say they were amateurs.Three or four properly trained professionals could have terminated them quickly I would think. I have heard from two Russian bloggers who stated that they had been to events at that theatre in the past and there were always some armed police presence. That is absolutely standard now in the West and I would have thought that Russia in the midst of a war and after being warned about concert attacks would have had an armed presence outside and inside the theatre. I conclude the attack was allowed to take place, why , we will most likely see from Putin's final reaction. If it leads to another round of mobilisation then we know why. Many folk have said that Putin needed a big false flag to get support for further mobilisation and I am expecting this to be what is really going on. What Putin needs now is to provide absolute proof on Ukraine's involvement and then start the call up , that will shed light on the entire event.
As for the videos , the muzzle sparks still have me puzzled. I have yet to see a realistic explanation for them. I have watched a lot of video on real life weapon testing and never seen any thing like that. When blanks are fired they are loaded with varying amounts of material in order to increase muzzle flash for special effects but the flash still comes from the muzzle , the barrel , whereas these sparks seem to be coming from somewhere else like from the breech , very strange. The shooting out of the glass in the door as the shooter enters that part of the complex demonstrates that they were firing live rounds. Regarding the ISIS connection I suppose they might have just gotten lucky and dredged up these monkeys to do the job but usually they have there own men do the job and they don't run away , they stay and fight to the death or self destruct with explosives so as to get to the promised land of young virgins. The lack of suicide belts and the attempted escape by car does not fit their MO. So many anomalies abound on all sides but hopefully shit will get clearer as time passes. For myself a complete staging is just implausible as there is a cast of thousands and it is too hard to fake something this big and keep every person involved on script.
I'm still incredulous about all this. They actually pulled a WTC... They did a Larry Silverstein. And blamed it on "terrorists." But thanks to Slavsquat we are all quickly pulled back to earth from our fears about what is next. Now the "weird video" makes sense. The "terrorists" were planted to distract from the arson that was the main event that night. It goes to show that very wealthy people just don't give a damn about other people. But what will never be explained, and which really exposes the underbelly of the Russian hard mentality and "culture" is the fact that these 4 pitiful schnooks - the "terrorists" - were bludgeoned and tortured into "confessing" and that the sickening images of this torture were shamelessly distributed all over the internet for public display of how terrorists are handled in Russia. No form of due process, just personal and sadistic self-service by individuals who are in charge of law and order. Their actions are no different than those of the Crocus proprietors. The way the supposed perpetrators were treated is undermining the seemingly civilized attitudes by those that lead the nation, and is actually questioned more so than the reason for the "terrorist attack" itself - why is Russia suddenly allowing this torture to be so openly publicized? That's a question you will read in just about all the newspapers in western EU. To me, the hard and cold mentality that has characterized Russia for centuries, has not changed. I thought it had, but this proves me wrong. And how incredibly sad that not a single soul wonders about these four patsies that were going to pay the price for this greedy and murderous scam, as "islamist terrorists." Russia's response is terrorizing its own credibility as stronghold of newfound civilization. Slavsquat is a ray of light, keep shining the light!
Those are all excellent questions.
Not to be a wet blanket, though, your "questions" yesterday were not. You implied in your observations of the events in the video that the attack was false/fake/staged/not real.
Your implications were received loud and clear by many commenters, who commented extensively on the "fakeness" of the scenes. Those commenters were clearly influenced by your insinuations of "fakeness."
So, keep asking questions--but, if you're so sensitive to feedback questioning your line of questions, you may want to pull back from the far edge of skepticism.
After all, burning office chairs took down the World Trade Center, right?