"One of the reasons for the demographic crisis is infertility, the scale of which is only growing in Russia, which is again confirmed by statistics. About 15% of Russian couples are infertile..."
A problem which is occuring throughout Western societies and parts of Asia.
Here's some interesting info regarding fertility:
"9 of 10 countries with the highest total fertility rate are in Africa followed by Afghanistan.
Southern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Eastern Asia have the lowest fertility rates in the world..."
One has to wonder, why are the more "underdeveloped" countries so fertile and conversely why are the so-called modern, or industrialized nations so infertile.
Perhaps, it has something to with being overly exposed to insidious chemicals and dubious pharmaceutical products all more prevalent in developed countries, hence over time resulting in various types of infertility for both males and females.
What I can say, is that the "fertility industry" is a huge business in the US requiring the outlay of many thousands of dollars for those who desperately want to be parents. Especially, if the procedure required is invitro fertilization (IVF).
An expense "not" covered by health insurance companies. And ironically, not covered by the military who'll pay for transgender modification surgery, but "not" for fertility treatments for biologically female soldiers who are infertile, go figure.
One also has to wonder, whether the "clot shot" mandated during the scamdemic for healthy childbearing age women will compound the infertility problem.
And if it is poisonous chemicals and pharmaceuticals that's responsible for infertility, one could also cynically reach the conclusion that's there's been a decades long "deliberate"
targeted attempt to depopulate specific indigenous populations.
That being said,
I personally believe chemicals and pharmaceutical products have slaughtered more people than bombs, bullets, or drones.
Have you noticed how the a certain race are targeted (in general) ?,and yes I know Japan are having a similar problem. But even if we take out issues like the Kalgeri plan and the mass immigration into the "West"... and go back to the fundamental depopulation agenda of the UN Agenda and WEF, it will not be the adverse effects that meet their goals, it will be on our future generations that become sterile....and yes you are spot on about the "chemicals and pharmaceuticals" ... and in fact, our food, air, water, etc. etc.
CO2 is good for the planet, not bad... it is in balance with the planet ...it has to be. SO if CO2 levels go up a fraction or go down a fraction... more or less trees, plants, shrubs or flowers are on the planet....
Also as a chemical engineer, I can tell you that CO2 does not effect temperature, it is the other way around and the only contributing factor to Earth's temperature in the SUN.
Climate chnge is just like the jab - a scam, to control us; look up their 15-minute cities and smart neighbourhoods.. ALL FOR THE SAKE OF CLIMATE CHANGE !!!.
Life on earth as we know it depends on things like holding as absolute and axiomatic truth the insanely irrational and utterly baseless belief that money equals wealth as the basis of social realtions, complete with other shit like religions and "god", whatever that trash word means for different religious nutcases, and socio-political idiotsincracies. "It's the economy, you damn fucktard" some would say.
Depopulating the planet from excess numbers of taxcattle who "think" that way would be far from a bad thing if we hadn't reached this point under the guidance of the "invisible hand" on the non-existent "free market"; that is, the designs of the global conglomerate of instutionalized corporate overclass posing as state and free enterprise and "entrepreneurship".
Best is that your corporate overlords don't even need to reproduce to maintain the status quo hereditarily, they just need to keep monopolizing money printing, or in the age of CBDCs, virtual issuance of token numbers to keep buying up additions to their ranks, as many USEUNATO regimes do buying and gobbling up migrants from the world over.
But those are issues political hacks and conglomerate partners like Putin and his Kremlin minions will never address, waste of time trying to find sense where there can be none. In the Kremlin case, they need more orthodox Christians and state-backed patriots to fight the evil Satanic, neocolonial Western unipolar LGBT armies.
However, even with AI technology the ghouls need a constant slave force of millions in Africa to extract all those valuable rare earth minerals, which will save the planet for the techno/fascist billionaires and international financiers while simultaneously eliminating the unscrubbed useless masses. Of course, these Malthusian eugenicist transhumanists will determine who'll be the worthy remaining survivors. That'll depend on who's willing to be exploited by providing the required maintenence for the pyschopaths technology.
I believe that those who believe they are simply trying to evolve into little idiot gods, who'll live forever and remodel the universe in their own image, are sorely deluded.
Everything they've done up to this point has simply been because they hate humans and want to be cruel to them; and once they've gotten rid of (most of) them, and are mostly left with only the project of making the sun rise in the West, the excruciating boredom they'll experience will betray them.
People in SE Asia all used to walk to school/work or ride bicycles. Now they drive cars or ride motorbikes. Obesity rates are much higher and we must assume the lack of exercise has fertility effects too.
If the Russian government had a long term perspective and just a smidgen of ability to think outside the box, it would create an attractive and streamlined immigration program to attract immigration from the West. Russia could literally garner millions of skilled immigrants if the government made some real concessions, for example by creating a few bilingual zones: say, one German-Russian zone, one English-Russian zone and one French-Russian zone.
Well, lots of desperate farmers from South Africa, lots of desperate Dutch cattle/cow/dairy operators looking for Space. You need to handle the climate AND know animal husbandry well. Work hard, and you can likely make something happen. But again, how much do you value what you do and love to do? If you love to farm, you love being a farmer.. it might be worth it to move and be allowed to farm in peace...
A theoretically sound suggestion. Seeing how well a similar undertaking worked for Russians who immigrated to Ukraine, this might sour the expectations of such a scheme on all sides.
Yeah, well I was over at the immigration and residency offices several months ago here in St Petersburg Russia, and you know what I saw? I saw thousands upon thousands of little stan country people, and their women in head scarfs, swarming all over the buildings and out onto an area of several blocks onto the streets....and about two white people. All filing for residency and work papers. It was like being in another country. And you can bet they will be having lots of babies. That's what Russian immigration policy is doing to Russia.
Another one of my favorite cases in point is the fact that Russian border officials (the people at immigration) often speak ONLY Russian. In this day and age this is really incredible.
Indeed. It's all part of the same pattern, which reflects either a complete lack of interest in immigration from the West or a lack of awareness of the lingering nature of the Soviet mentality in the Russia bureaucratic apparatus.
One case in point: In China basically if you want to get the Russian Consulate to do anything for you you need to hire an agent with special relationships on the inside. This widespread inefficiency in government is a huge drag which increases costs and slows everything down. The contrast between Russia and China in this respect is quite glaring. At least in the major cities, with the occasional exception China got rid of this Soviet-style attitude long ago.
One can only hope that the Mishustin's recent visit to Shanghai will lead to some more delegations of Russian bureaucrats coming to China to learn how to cast off the Soviet legacy.
The high cost (relative to earnings) of servicing a typical Russian mortgage, most probably contributes to a certain ´´procreative hesitancy´´ among young couples. Again..banking reform?
As every nation that installed an edequate age pension system discovered, within 20 years or so the birth rate fell. I recall discussing this with human environment expert and architect, Buckminster Fuller in 1970, wherein he described his own research in this field. That was easily the most educational phone call I have ever received.
This phenomenon was initially overlooked in NZ, Australia and Scandanavia because immigration covered up the cracks in the demographic floor. Today, almost all countries are down to around 2.5 kids per family, which has infruriated the eugenicists and upset their entire "global overpopulation" narrative. As Fuller explained, it was always a myth. He demonstrated how we could fit the entire world population into the state of Texas, with each family on a standard house with front and back yard. This concept kinda takes the wind outa the panic merchant's sails.
Personally, I think the UN should declare open season on any people heard using the term "overpopulation", because shooting is probably the only way to rid the planet of eugenicists. Also, I like shooting eugenicists. Any globalists, really.
Thanks, Riley. The human birth rate worldwide is plunging, responding to the massive ecocide being perpetuated by the toxic chemical wastes produced by the global industrial capitalist system over the last 150 years or so. It's expected to decline to zero by 2040, at current rates.
If I actually got up and proposed proven measures to boost the demography, I'd be booed by the media, the deputies, and escorted out by the police for good measure.
Hell, who am I kidding, I would never even be let 10 feet into a government building.
The elites clearly want us all dead and tagged and then replaced.
Who wants to bring a poor soul to suffer on earth. NOT ME and I'm from India, the most populated country on earth. I have seen PEOPLE, when I travel abroad, I see desert in terms of people. Indians just BREED without any THINKING and I suffered a lot.
Childrens are a gift of god is just propaganda brainwashing for tribals, my parents believed it.
Do you really want your kid to be autistic, get vax to the max, loans, debts, violence, disease. IT'S NEVER ENDING. The blueprint is India. They want every country on earth to be like India. Example, America San Francisco - people poop in the open, just like in India - Wait, when you read Americans pooping and pissing in the open - know that the fun is just beginning.
Yes, but not all countries are like that. The nice countries you went to are nice because nice men and women made nice children who grew up to make nice things and generally make the place pleasant and liveable (and the cycle repeats).
HitchBOT, the hitchhiking robot that was created by Canadian researchers as a social experiment successfully traveled across Canada, the Netherlands and Germany, but was vandalized and beheaded in Philadelphia in 2015. That was a sad end for a friendly robot that relied on the kindness of strangers.😢
This is just one example of how a degraded and violent society behaves. The USA is very different from the civil society of Japan and the highly controlled citizens of China. It is safe for an American to wander the streets of Beijing or Shanghai after dark. This cannot be said about Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, Baltimore, Flint, Louisville, NYC, or LA. Kyoto is a garden city, beautiful and filled with delights. America is becoming the trashbin of the world.
I am absolutely sorry that I don't feel any kind of empathy for an High-tech which takes advantage of the human bias of anthropomorphizing ever since our first teddy bear, thus cheating our innate ability to have empathy. The scientist who produced that "experiment" should know that. I guess I would kick the tech if I encountered it.
Nevertheless, during the full time the scamdemic was raging in France and elsewhere, a French guy decided to run thru Europe (3500 km) without money, eating small amount of veggie and relying solely on the good will of people he encountered on the way. Everywhere was he welcome and got all the help he needed without any police interference:
The experiment, which was a success in Canada and in the Netherlands, was a terrible failure once it reached the lawless city of Philadelphia. Can't you even understand the significance of that? Should teddy bears be made illegal because babies find them lovable? Should all dogs and cats be euthanized because nice humans are comforted by petting and hugging their fur babies?
I watched the video and, not being a French speaking individual, all I saw was a barefoot freak endangering his health, his feet, and his legs with a ridiculous narcissistic show. No doubt St. Benedict and St. Francis of Assisi would applaud his feat. Good for them. Good for you.
Charles, my empathy goes to the human victims of lawless Philadelphia. All victims. The society at large victim of the policies enacted by sickos, insane media mind destruction... The victims of rampant crime...
I am now going to have a glass of wine with St François d'Assise, while caressing the cat on my lap.
Charles, I should have mentioned that the guy was barefoot, ate only raw food and had no ID whatsoever and even if controlled he had never had any problem. He just trusted the universe and he is a very sincere individual...
I thought you would have written that it was "funny" and "fabulous".
Anyway, seriously, the guy had problems with shoes and at some point he decided to run barefoot and then all his problems disappeared, not only with his foot but also with the overall posture of the body. He never gets injured because his foot are prepared. I myself only wear minimalist shoes and sometime, go in the wood presently singing very nearby, running barefoot.
As an aside and to answer furthermore the question by Johnaton of how to have more baby, while walking, gardening or running barefoot, one is reconnected with the negative polarity of the soil and the positive higher up and this is not a new age thing. It is good and natural for one's health.
Charles, what about the fact that everywhere he went, in the middle of the global 'mediaticaly' induced nevrosis, he was welcome and sheltered for a night?...
Every country in the world is declining I think, aren't they? In the Western world at least. Why is it a bad thing? Fact is that it is not a bad thing. But childish view of it make is seem so is all.
This is a fair point, and one often forgotten. There is no reason why a smaller population per se is a bad thing. Given time, economies can adjust. That said, Russia does of course have a somewhat special situation in that it is literally enormous and outside of Moscow/Peterburg for the most part already has a very low population density, AND at the same time, is in a military standoff with the EU which already has several times its population.
The problem with population decline, as I understand it, is that there are eventually too few in the work force to both staff the services elders require and to pay for the old age pensions the seniors paid into all their working lives, with the expectation that they would collect in their turn.
In Canada, and other countries, we are already seeing the difficulty finding entry level workers to staff service, agricultural and other sectors. This impacts everyone. Restaurants shortening their hours, understaffed outlets providing subpar service, etc. Not to mention the lack of trained medical staff in most communities. (This has other causes also, of course. Mandatory vaccination and a government that doesn't provide an adequate number of spots in universities for training medical doctors to name a few.)
The population becomes top heavy. That's the problem with declining population. So if you don't mind growing old without adequate financial resources, medical service, agricultural workers to harvest your food and service industry staff to cater to your needs ... then declining population is a golden idea.
That's about the actual declining. Not about the population level.
It embraces the thought that there are no viable stable populations only perpetually increasing ones, too, a notion many businesses and politicians are devoted to. Which I do not agree with.
We would expect changing abilities AND changing requirements as we move to different population levels. That doesn't prohibit them it just means things have to be done to accommodate them.
Fewer people to supply a service but fewer people requiring it would be the overall thing wouldn't it?
There's huge amounts of spare capacity in the society we can clearly see. Huge amounts of effort go into arms industries for instance. Huge amounts go into frivolities. Entertainments. Huge amounts of resources go into unrequired 'luxury'. I'm thinking of the effort required to manufacture vast fleets of differently coloured and shaped motor cars. That breadth of choice, though nice, is nowhere near efficient use of resources, nothing like it. Millions of examples.
So whatever the problems of that nature they are not problems of the essence but of the chosen disposition of resources, the chosen configuration of the society at that time.
The biggest part of what you point to seems to me to be the 'top heavy' aspect which is all about there being too many old people and not enough young on the assumption that the old are contributing nothing and the young do everything. Doubtful assumptions.
But even if it were wholly valid that's all about an unbalanced population. That's all about lower birth rates. It is not about lower populations per se.
It is a completely different question with completely different parameters and factors, implications, solutions.
I say again, it is, as you say, a question of 'declining population', not a 'declined', lower, population.
The point is that yes, a 'declined' population IS a golden idea.
Overcrowding the planet or even my favourite beach is a shoddy idea.
And doing it because we can't see how to live without doing it is rather pathetic for a human race at this stage of its development.
As mentioned in the article and researched by numerous scientists, we aren't in fact overcrowded.
And yes, I was speaking about the demographics of a declining population. How we have more older, retired folk than young working people to provide services for them. It's not about the old doing nothing. Re-read what I wrote. Many countries are already living this shortage of services, so it's not theory as is your response.
An unbalanced population is inevitable with population decline. If we keep having too few children to replace ourselves, the population will always be declining versus "declined" and the demographics always skewed. Basic math. Unless you're for euthanizing older folk to balance things out?
It's not about "doing it because we can't see how to live without doing it." It's about a false premise: that we are over populated. We aren't and a population that declines over a period, especially given infertility rates, is in fact an extinction crisis in the making. Is that a golden idea? Perhaps. If you hate humanity.
Over populated or not is a subjective thing. That's basic logic or English comprehension.
Saying that the service cannot be provided to the old and that's a basic cause of a national existential problem is to suggest those old cannot provide the services to themselves: it is to suggest they are a deadweight drain and you, I imagine, a quite well aware of that implication.
If you are not the elderly certainly are and all over the world complain of how they are marginalised and locked out.
If we keep having too few children is a different discussion again. Shifting goalposts again.
And it is a presumption. Because the birthrate is lower now does not mean it will always be so.
In a happier world with less irrational mania for mindless growth more people may have a desire to have children and raise them.
Your last paragraph is illogical to an extreme taken all in, that is: going to the last sentence. Ludicrous.
When the entire population of the planet could fit in Texas, each allotted the same space as is average in NYC, we're not overpopulated. You can call that subjective I guess. I'd call it obvious.
That's all I have time for. Enjoy the rest of your day!
"In 2021, at the height of the “pandemic”, Russia suffered a natural population of decline (when deaths exceed births) of over 1 million people—a record loss of life not seen since the Great Patriotic War." Perhaps it's time for Ed Dowd to analyze what has caused the excess deaths? This is a disaster...
Surely, as long as it happens naturally, a declining human population is nothing but a good thing? The same thing is happening all over Europe, and though there are several reasons, the most obvious is that populations were artificially inflated by industrialisation and are falling as we move away from that kind of economy.
Hey Riley have you looked into some of the Russian Republics outer layers?? Their numbers are dreadful.... As a Scandinavian I always watch the Republic of Karelia, its offical population dropped from 622,484 in 2018 down to 533,121 in 2021 this must be one of the largest population declines seen in history... I guess all Russians are heading for Petrozavodsk....?
Does that only concern ethnic Russians or one can find the same trend among other ethnic groups in the Russian Federation?
Are all ethnic Russians concerned? I of course won't ask if one could check if maybe the Ginsburg/astra Zeneka witch soup could have some effect like in the West since I guess it would be impossible to find the data but maybe we could discern the trend among socio-economic groups or religious vs non religious people...
They are importing Stan country peoples in the droves! The immigration and residency office district in St Petersburg is like going to Uzbekistan or something. It's seething with them.
"One of the reasons for the demographic crisis is infertility, the scale of which is only growing in Russia, which is again confirmed by statistics. About 15% of Russian couples are infertile..."
A problem which is occuring throughout Western societies and parts of Asia.
Here's some interesting info regarding fertility:
"9 of 10 countries with the highest total fertility rate are in Africa followed by Afghanistan.
Southern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Eastern Asia have the lowest fertility rates in the world..."
One has to wonder, why are the more "underdeveloped" countries so fertile and conversely why are the so-called modern, or industrialized nations so infertile.
Perhaps, it has something to with being overly exposed to insidious chemicals and dubious pharmaceutical products all more prevalent in developed countries, hence over time resulting in various types of infertility for both males and females.
What I can say, is that the "fertility industry" is a huge business in the US requiring the outlay of many thousands of dollars for those who desperately want to be parents. Especially, if the procedure required is invitro fertilization (IVF).
An expense "not" covered by health insurance companies. And ironically, not covered by the military who'll pay for transgender modification surgery, but "not" for fertility treatments for biologically female soldiers who are infertile, go figure.
One also has to wonder, whether the "clot shot" mandated during the scamdemic for healthy childbearing age women will compound the infertility problem.
And if it is poisonous chemicals and pharmaceuticals that's responsible for infertility, one could also cynically reach the conclusion that's there's been a decades long "deliberate"
targeted attempt to depopulate specific indigenous populations.
That being said,
I personally believe chemicals and pharmaceutical products have slaughtered more people than bombs, bullets, or drones.
Have you noticed how the a certain race are targeted (in general) ?,and yes I know Japan are having a similar problem. But even if we take out issues like the Kalgeri plan and the mass immigration into the "West"... and go back to the fundamental depopulation agenda of the UN Agenda and WEF, it will not be the adverse effects that meet their goals, it will be on our future generations that become sterile....and yes you are spot on about the "chemicals and pharmaceuticals" ... and in fact, our food, air, water, etc. etc.
Hope that made sense.
Hey!
The worst pollution of all in this weird non contest is electricity and waves used for communication, G1, G2 etc...
Instead of investing so much effort into CO2 reduction, maybe for the West it would be way smarter to invest into pesticide-free farming techniques
Zuckerberg and the other billionaires have organic farms or ranches as they'd never eat the shit they want to feed the proles.
CO2 is good for the planet, not bad... it is in balance with the planet ...it has to be. SO if CO2 levels go up a fraction or go down a fraction... more or less trees, plants, shrubs or flowers are on the planet....
Also as a chemical engineer, I can tell you that CO2 does not effect temperature, it is the other way around and the only contributing factor to Earth's temperature in the SUN.
Climate chnge is just like the jab - a scam, to control us; look up their 15-minute cities and smart neighbourhoods.. ALL FOR THE SAKE OF CLIMATE CHANGE !!!.
Life on earth as we know it depends on things like holding as absolute and axiomatic truth the insanely irrational and utterly baseless belief that money equals wealth as the basis of social realtions, complete with other shit like religions and "god", whatever that trash word means for different religious nutcases, and socio-political idiotsincracies. "It's the economy, you damn fucktard" some would say.
Depopulating the planet from excess numbers of taxcattle who "think" that way would be far from a bad thing if we hadn't reached this point under the guidance of the "invisible hand" on the non-existent "free market"; that is, the designs of the global conglomerate of instutionalized corporate overclass posing as state and free enterprise and "entrepreneurship".
Best is that your corporate overlords don't even need to reproduce to maintain the status quo hereditarily, they just need to keep monopolizing money printing, or in the age of CBDCs, virtual issuance of token numbers to keep buying up additions to their ranks, as many USEUNATO regimes do buying and gobbling up migrants from the world over.
But those are issues political hacks and conglomerate partners like Putin and his Kremlin minions will never address, waste of time trying to find sense where there can be none. In the Kremlin case, they need more orthodox Christians and state-backed patriots to fight the evil Satanic, neocolonial Western unipolar LGBT armies.
However, even with AI technology the ghouls need a constant slave force of millions in Africa to extract all those valuable rare earth minerals, which will save the planet for the techno/fascist billionaires and international financiers while simultaneously eliminating the unscrubbed useless masses. Of course, these Malthusian eugenicist transhumanists will determine who'll be the worthy remaining survivors. That'll depend on who's willing to be exploited by providing the required maintenence for the pyschopaths technology.
I believe that those who believe they are simply trying to evolve into little idiot gods, who'll live forever and remodel the universe in their own image, are sorely deluded.
Everything they've done up to this point has simply been because they hate humans and want to be cruel to them; and once they've gotten rid of (most of) them, and are mostly left with only the project of making the sun rise in the West, the excruciating boredom they'll experience will betray them.
People in SE Asia all used to walk to school/work or ride bicycles. Now they drive cars or ride motorbikes. Obesity rates are much higher and we must assume the lack of exercise has fertility effects too.
I'm not sure about obesity causing infertility, however, poor nutrition might be a factor.
If the Russian government had a long term perspective and just a smidgen of ability to think outside the box, it would create an attractive and streamlined immigration program to attract immigration from the West. Russia could literally garner millions of skilled immigrants if the government made some real concessions, for example by creating a few bilingual zones: say, one German-Russian zone, one English-Russian zone and one French-Russian zone.
I think they do, but their offer is to attract people into the scarcely populated areas - which are ruddy cold.
Yeah not very attractive. You're never going to get high quality immigrants by offering them a plot of land in Siberia.
Well, lots of desperate farmers from South Africa, lots of desperate Dutch cattle/cow/dairy operators looking for Space. You need to handle the climate AND know animal husbandry well. Work hard, and you can likely make something happen. But again, how much do you value what you do and love to do? If you love to farm, you love being a farmer.. it might be worth it to move and be allowed to farm in peace...
A theoretically sound suggestion. Seeing how well a similar undertaking worked for Russians who immigrated to Ukraine, this might sour the expectations of such a scheme on all sides.
It worked for a few hundred years the first time they tried it. https://www.volgagermans.org/
Yeah, well I was over at the immigration and residency offices several months ago here in St Petersburg Russia, and you know what I saw? I saw thousands upon thousands of little stan country people, and their women in head scarfs, swarming all over the buildings and out onto an area of several blocks onto the streets....and about two white people. All filing for residency and work papers. It was like being in another country. And you can bet they will be having lots of babies. That's what Russian immigration policy is doing to Russia.
Another one of my favorite cases in point is the fact that Russian border officials (the people at immigration) often speak ONLY Russian. In this day and age this is really incredible.
Indeed. It's all part of the same pattern, which reflects either a complete lack of interest in immigration from the West or a lack of awareness of the lingering nature of the Soviet mentality in the Russia bureaucratic apparatus.
One case in point: In China basically if you want to get the Russian Consulate to do anything for you you need to hire an agent with special relationships on the inside. This widespread inefficiency in government is a huge drag which increases costs and slows everything down. The contrast between Russia and China in this respect is quite glaring. At least in the major cities, with the occasional exception China got rid of this Soviet-style attitude long ago.
One can only hope that the Mishustin's recent visit to Shanghai will lead to some more delegations of Russian bureaucrats coming to China to learn how to cast off the Soviet legacy.
The high cost (relative to earnings) of servicing a typical Russian mortgage, most probably contributes to a certain ´´procreative hesitancy´´ among young couples. Again..banking reform?
Exactly, try raising a family when you don't even have enough money for yourself!
As every nation that installed an edequate age pension system discovered, within 20 years or so the birth rate fell. I recall discussing this with human environment expert and architect, Buckminster Fuller in 1970, wherein he described his own research in this field. That was easily the most educational phone call I have ever received.
This phenomenon was initially overlooked in NZ, Australia and Scandanavia because immigration covered up the cracks in the demographic floor. Today, almost all countries are down to around 2.5 kids per family, which has infruriated the eugenicists and upset their entire "global overpopulation" narrative. As Fuller explained, it was always a myth. He demonstrated how we could fit the entire world population into the state of Texas, with each family on a standard house with front and back yard. This concept kinda takes the wind outa the panic merchant's sails.
Personally, I think the UN should declare open season on any people heard using the term "overpopulation", because shooting is probably the only way to rid the planet of eugenicists. Also, I like shooting eugenicists. Any globalists, really.
Thanks, Riley. The human birth rate worldwide is plunging, responding to the massive ecocide being perpetuated by the toxic chemical wastes produced by the global industrial capitalist system over the last 150 years or so. It's expected to decline to zero by 2040, at current rates.
If I actually got up and proposed proven measures to boost the demography, I'd be booed by the media, the deputies, and escorted out by the police for good measure.
Hell, who am I kidding, I would never even be let 10 feet into a government building.
The elites clearly want us all dead and tagged and then replaced.
Yep, it seems all they need are robots with a.i.!
Marry women off at 16 as virgin brides
Ban birth control
Wow bros the demographics are healthy now
Who wants to bring a poor soul to suffer on earth. NOT ME and I'm from India, the most populated country on earth. I have seen PEOPLE, when I travel abroad, I see desert in terms of people. Indians just BREED without any THINKING and I suffered a lot.
Childrens are a gift of god is just propaganda brainwashing for tribals, my parents believed it.
Do you really want your kid to be autistic, get vax to the max, loans, debts, violence, disease. IT'S NEVER ENDING. The blueprint is India. They want every country on earth to be like India. Example, America San Francisco - people poop in the open, just like in India - Wait, when you read Americans pooping and pissing in the open - know that the fun is just beginning.
Yes, but not all countries are like that. The nice countries you went to are nice because nice men and women made nice children who grew up to make nice things and generally make the place pleasant and liveable (and the cycle repeats).
HitchBOT, the hitchhiking robot that was created by Canadian researchers as a social experiment successfully traveled across Canada, the Netherlands and Germany, but was vandalized and beheaded in Philadelphia in 2015. That was a sad end for a friendly robot that relied on the kindness of strangers.😢
This is just one example of how a degraded and violent society behaves. The USA is very different from the civil society of Japan and the highly controlled citizens of China. It is safe for an American to wander the streets of Beijing or Shanghai after dark. This cannot be said about Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, Baltimore, Flint, Louisville, NYC, or LA. Kyoto is a garden city, beautiful and filled with delights. America is becoming the trashbin of the world.
Hello Charles,
I am absolutely sorry that I don't feel any kind of empathy for an High-tech which takes advantage of the human bias of anthropomorphizing ever since our first teddy bear, thus cheating our innate ability to have empathy. The scientist who produced that "experiment" should know that. I guess I would kick the tech if I encountered it.
Nevertheless, during the full time the scamdemic was raging in France and elsewhere, a French guy decided to run thru Europe (3500 km) without money, eating small amount of veggie and relying solely on the good will of people he encountered on the way. Everywhere was he welcome and got all the help he needed without any police interference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UnNO-AC9kM
This could be considered an interesting experiment.
Hello Bugey.
The experiment, which was a success in Canada and in the Netherlands, was a terrible failure once it reached the lawless city of Philadelphia. Can't you even understand the significance of that? Should teddy bears be made illegal because babies find them lovable? Should all dogs and cats be euthanized because nice humans are comforted by petting and hugging their fur babies?
I watched the video and, not being a French speaking individual, all I saw was a barefoot freak endangering his health, his feet, and his legs with a ridiculous narcissistic show. No doubt St. Benedict and St. Francis of Assisi would applaud his feat. Good for them. Good for you.
Charles, my empathy goes to the human victims of lawless Philadelphia. All victims. The society at large victim of the policies enacted by sickos, insane media mind destruction... The victims of rampant crime...
I am now going to have a glass of wine with St François d'Assise, while caressing the cat on my lap.
Charles, I should have mentioned that the guy was barefoot, ate only raw food and had no ID whatsoever and even if controlled he had never had any problem. He just trusted the universe and he is a very sincere individual...
Take care
It's one thing a curiosity one man show, with added social
(and otherwise media) exposure. Doesn't indicate anything really, imo.
Yes. I noticed he punished himself by running barefoot on pavement. It made me wonder what his level of self-hatred and stupidity was.
I thought you would have written that it was "funny" and "fabulous".
Anyway, seriously, the guy had problems with shoes and at some point he decided to run barefoot and then all his problems disappeared, not only with his foot but also with the overall posture of the body. He never gets injured because his foot are prepared. I myself only wear minimalist shoes and sometime, go in the wood presently singing very nearby, running barefoot.
As an aside and to answer furthermore the question by Johnaton of how to have more baby, while walking, gardening or running barefoot, one is reconnected with the negative polarity of the soil and the positive higher up and this is not a new age thing. It is good and natural for one's health.
Charles, what about the fact that everywhere he went, in the middle of the global 'mediaticaly' induced nevrosis, he was welcome and sheltered for a night?...
Every country in the world is declining I think, aren't they? In the Western world at least. Why is it a bad thing? Fact is that it is not a bad thing. But childish view of it make is seem so is all.
This is a fair point, and one often forgotten. There is no reason why a smaller population per se is a bad thing. Given time, economies can adjust. That said, Russia does of course have a somewhat special situation in that it is literally enormous and outside of Moscow/Peterburg for the most part already has a very low population density, AND at the same time, is in a military standoff with the EU which already has several times its population.
Austrian China is back! Hope you are fine.
The problem with population decline, as I understand it, is that there are eventually too few in the work force to both staff the services elders require and to pay for the old age pensions the seniors paid into all their working lives, with the expectation that they would collect in their turn.
In Canada, and other countries, we are already seeing the difficulty finding entry level workers to staff service, agricultural and other sectors. This impacts everyone. Restaurants shortening their hours, understaffed outlets providing subpar service, etc. Not to mention the lack of trained medical staff in most communities. (This has other causes also, of course. Mandatory vaccination and a government that doesn't provide an adequate number of spots in universities for training medical doctors to name a few.)
The population becomes top heavy. That's the problem with declining population. So if you don't mind growing old without adequate financial resources, medical service, agricultural workers to harvest your food and service industry staff to cater to your needs ... then declining population is a golden idea.
That's about the actual declining. Not about the population level.
It embraces the thought that there are no viable stable populations only perpetually increasing ones, too, a notion many businesses and politicians are devoted to. Which I do not agree with.
We would expect changing abilities AND changing requirements as we move to different population levels. That doesn't prohibit them it just means things have to be done to accommodate them.
Fewer people to supply a service but fewer people requiring it would be the overall thing wouldn't it?
There's huge amounts of spare capacity in the society we can clearly see. Huge amounts of effort go into arms industries for instance. Huge amounts go into frivolities. Entertainments. Huge amounts of resources go into unrequired 'luxury'. I'm thinking of the effort required to manufacture vast fleets of differently coloured and shaped motor cars. That breadth of choice, though nice, is nowhere near efficient use of resources, nothing like it. Millions of examples.
So whatever the problems of that nature they are not problems of the essence but of the chosen disposition of resources, the chosen configuration of the society at that time.
The biggest part of what you point to seems to me to be the 'top heavy' aspect which is all about there being too many old people and not enough young on the assumption that the old are contributing nothing and the young do everything. Doubtful assumptions.
But even if it were wholly valid that's all about an unbalanced population. That's all about lower birth rates. It is not about lower populations per se.
It is a completely different question with completely different parameters and factors, implications, solutions.
I say again, it is, as you say, a question of 'declining population', not a 'declined', lower, population.
The point is that yes, a 'declined' population IS a golden idea.
Overcrowding the planet or even my favourite beach is a shoddy idea.
And doing it because we can't see how to live without doing it is rather pathetic for a human race at this stage of its development.
As mentioned in the article and researched by numerous scientists, we aren't in fact overcrowded.
And yes, I was speaking about the demographics of a declining population. How we have more older, retired folk than young working people to provide services for them. It's not about the old doing nothing. Re-read what I wrote. Many countries are already living this shortage of services, so it's not theory as is your response.
An unbalanced population is inevitable with population decline. If we keep having too few children to replace ourselves, the population will always be declining versus "declined" and the demographics always skewed. Basic math. Unless you're for euthanizing older folk to balance things out?
It's not about "doing it because we can't see how to live without doing it." It's about a false premise: that we are over populated. We aren't and a population that declines over a period, especially given infertility rates, is in fact an extinction crisis in the making. Is that a golden idea? Perhaps. If you hate humanity.
Over populated or not is a subjective thing. That's basic logic or English comprehension.
Saying that the service cannot be provided to the old and that's a basic cause of a national existential problem is to suggest those old cannot provide the services to themselves: it is to suggest they are a deadweight drain and you, I imagine, a quite well aware of that implication.
If you are not the elderly certainly are and all over the world complain of how they are marginalised and locked out.
If we keep having too few children is a different discussion again. Shifting goalposts again.
And it is a presumption. Because the birthrate is lower now does not mean it will always be so.
In a happier world with less irrational mania for mindless growth more people may have a desire to have children and raise them.
Your last paragraph is illogical to an extreme taken all in, that is: going to the last sentence. Ludicrous.
When the entire population of the planet could fit in Texas, each allotted the same space as is average in NYC, we're not overpopulated. You can call that subjective I guess. I'd call it obvious.
That's all I have time for. Enjoy the rest of your day!
"In 2021, at the height of the “pandemic”, Russia suffered a natural population of decline (when deaths exceed births) of over 1 million people—a record loss of life not seen since the Great Patriotic War." Perhaps it's time for Ed Dowd to analyze what has caused the excess deaths? This is a disaster...
It's good to keep saying this. A lot of people are still under the impression that the Russian vaccine is safe.
Actually, it's the climate change, not the bio-weapon shot!
Surely, as long as it happens naturally, a declining human population is nothing but a good thing? The same thing is happening all over Europe, and though there are several reasons, the most obvious is that populations were artificially inflated by industrialisation and are falling as we move away from that kind of economy.
Hey Riley have you looked into some of the Russian Republics outer layers?? Their numbers are dreadful.... As a Scandinavian I always watch the Republic of Karelia, its offical population dropped from 622,484 in 2018 down to 533,121 in 2021 this must be one of the largest population declines seen in history... I guess all Russians are heading for Petrozavodsk....?
Does that only concern ethnic Russians or one can find the same trend among other ethnic groups in the Russian Federation?
Are all ethnic Russians concerned? I of course won't ask if one could check if maybe the Ginsburg/astra Zeneka witch soup could have some effect like in the West since I guess it would be impossible to find the data but maybe we could discern the trend among socio-economic groups or religious vs non religious people...
Yeah, small effect, just 1B+ dead globally and 3.5B were jabbed - and people are still lining up for the bio-weapon shot ...
Any men here with lots of kids? The world urgently needs your advice! How did you do it?
First let's try to get groovy and have a good funk to move your waist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHmA0N8RRA
Have a good day
Cool! Thanks!!
Luke McLindon, Head of Fertility Mater Hospital Brisbane saw failure rate of 16% become 74% after vaccines. Sacked.
Silent holocaust.
They are importing Stan country peoples in the droves! The immigration and residency office district in St Petersburg is like going to Uzbekistan or something. It's seething with them.
It's a rarity but this time Peskov is right.