Hello dear like-minded people, a few reflections on the article discussed, each with a translated quote excerpt:
1. „Two mortal enemies can share the same battlefield and the same weapons, thus resemble each other almost perfectly, and still remain mortal enemies."
Who knows for sure if they are even mortal enemies in this "game"???
2. „Since warfare is now largely computerised, it is not surprising that Russia and the other BRICS countries are also investing in this area - a sine qua non if they want to maintain the balance of power with the West in this area."
Everyone can do that as they wish, after all, one does not have to close oneself off to modern developments, as long as these developments serve the people? And who knows for sure whether this is really about a (ultimately also financial) showdown?
3. „You cannot fight NATO with bows and arrows. Why is that? Because NATO does not attack with bow and arrow. This military alliance and its military-industrial complex impose their choice of weapons for their hybrid warfare on a global scale, all the more easily because it is technology that makes universal history and all are forced to adapt to its rhythm, that of scientific discovery, if only to remain competitive and support the balance of power with equal weapons on the international stage, if only to challenge NATO's agenda."
What a killer argument! One starts war, the other has to join in? By the same means? I'm no expert on these things, but this much my common sense tells me: if the supposed enemy is killing its people with fake pandemics, lockdowns and deadly vaccines, that's one way of waging war, but not against the enemy cited in the article, but with weapons against the population. I really know of NO argument why Putin should then feel compelled to do the same (and it has not yet been proven that Sputnik does not cause similar damage, on the contrary… and even if not: To play the same game means to lie to the people!)
Apart from that, an important aspect is missing: this is about an inhuman ideology that is to be enforced worldwide at the expense of the population. War and technology are only the means to this end.
And so far I have never heard any clear statements from the leading politicians in East or West that call this ideology by its name, expose it, question it, let alone reject it! There would have been enough time for this for years, but ALL have kept silent in front of the people and let them run into their misfortune, after having actively orchestrated it in the meantime.
Putin included.
And one last thought that came to me while reading this article: unfortunately, it reminds me very much of what has been and is being addressed in the MSM as a message to the population, namely that this is about a war between West against East, because that is precisely what serves people's conventional ideas all too easily. And unfortunately it also fits all too well with PsyOps like Q, for example, in which people are led to believe Hopium is a good guy who has to go along with all this because that's the only way to save humanity.
Conclusion: poor Putin can't help it, he is forced to go along. But… wait: he is perhaps playing 5D-chess, too complicated for the „useless eater“ 🥳
No, seriously, the author has apparently consumed too much of Goethe's sorcerer's apprentice, the (technological) ghosts we called, we now can't get rid of?!? So responsibility no longer exists? Humanism adé? We are all victims? The whole thing is so ridiculous!🤦♀️
Hello, Riley. I made you a question some hours ago about my suspicion that the BRICS are going to make a show next year, withdrawing from the WHO but only to make later their own "WHO" and to continúe the vaxxing and the masking and the lockdowns and whatever else they need to surrender their
masses through "health emergencies"... but always respecting "sovereignity" and "multipolarity", of course...
My question for you is if my suspicion have some sense and, if it does, what could be the strategy they will use to accomplish that move, or what signs already exist that they are moving toward that path.
It is important for me because I know some people that is precisely expecting the BRICS to do so, but they are pretending that a move like this will just confirm that Putin & Co are the saviors of Humanity...
Riley, I suspect that the BRICS team will make a show in 2024 and withdraw from WHO, but --of course-- only to form their own "health organization" and continue doing the same thing on their own....
Anything is possible. Personally, I think BRICS leaving the WHO is unlikely because that would contradict everything they've been saying for the last decade or so (WHO as main instrument for ensuring "global health", and BRICS' preoccupation with global governance in general). But we'll see.
Thanks for your answer. And I apologize because I forgot to clarify that I was referring to the WHO's Pandemic Treaty issue.
I remember Jair Bolsonaro making some noise in this sense almost two years ago, when he still was the President of Brazil. And when the war with Ukraine began last year, I read about some rumors that the BRICS were not going to participate in any organization supported by the NATO guys and in any Treaty that "put in danger the sovereignity of nations"...
So, if the BRICS team has been created to offer a (false) alternative to the public, to promote the dellusional "Multipolarity World Order" and to appear as the "Revenge Team"... well, signing the Pandemic Treaty will not help them with that image.
Of course, as I said before, any withdrawing from the WHO by the BRICS --if it actually occurs-- will be just a show, because they will continue doing the same things they are doing now (vaxxing, masking, imposing biometrics and AI technocracy...), but in a more "sovereign" way... hehehe
Well, now that I clarify more my question, what do you think? Is that possible, the BRICS withdrawing from the WHO's Pandemic Treaty at some point in the future?
It's very similar to the Trump "story" - yes, he did promote vaccines, but that's because blah-blah-blah, he is playing 5D-chess, etc. Either all these '"saviors"(Trump, Putin, etc) are not that sharp, if they allow themselves to be outsmarted, or they are lying.
Absolutely, same story! But no one talks about the fact that politics has to be done for the well-being of the population; it is not discussed at all. It is so absurd that decisions are being made here over the heads of the people for the sole purpose of profit, even though those in power have the damned job of governing for the good of the people. It's all so perverse now that as a citizen I can only say: NO, I'm not taking part!
"And so far I have never heard any clear statements from the leading politicians in East or West that call this ideology by its name, expose it, question it, let alone reject it!"
People are led to believe that elections matter, that elected politicians represent the will of the people and they will do the best for the country. Nothing can be further from the truth. Politicians are 99% just fronts for the elites, to give you a) illusion of choice b) not to let people know they literally have owners, as Carlin said. Politicians are there to do the bidding of the elites, not what the nation needs, and therefore politicians will never speak up against the very plan they have been employed and handsomely paid to implement.
Let's help ourselves with an example, your neighbor - Czechia:
Czech government manifesto clearly states they are not going to raise taxes, they are going to heavily support education, and that they are against immigration. Sounds good and pinky promise!
Today they announced that education budget will be actually cut by 0.5billion euro, recently they agreed to EU Migration Pact, and already raised various taxes..
Why would politicians completely betray their voters and ruin their careers, why it almost looks like some political parties in Europe are created with pre-selected expiration date, only to be replaced by some new parties with fresh faces with even better lies?
It is all part of the plan and politicians dutifully carry this plan out. Every sane person knows that investment in nation's children is smart, but the elites do not want clever nation to question their every decision - they want simple, obedient workers permanently hypnotized by media propaganda. Taxes are raised to further decimate small businesses and households, already ravaged by covid and inflation. And migration = death of Europe.
I can understand you very well, it’s the same here in Germany, all goes down…. We need courage to survive the next month, years… and I really wish we could ally even better against this madness!
After the Covid madness, I believe anything can be done to us who like to think by our own heads. We will be turned into the XXI century witches burned at the stake.
I agree, they are unrestrained when it comes to their goals, as the last three years at the latest have clearly shown. It doesn't look like a rosy future at all😏
I only see survival with some kind of liberty by living below their radar. That's the main reason why i only use cash and not credit cards, by that way i can't be a paid sub in any substack, because we can't use cash to have access. The guys Riley and Rolo should take that into account when they close access to non paying readers.
"1. „Two mortal enemies can share the same battlefield and the same weapons, thus resemble each other almost perfectly, and still remain mortal enemies."
Who knows for sure if they are even mortal enemies in this "game"???"
Obviously the weapons we are talking about here do nothing against the 'enemy'. They only target the population. So I think it's save to say they are not enemies. We, the plebs, are their common enemy. And it's a war them against us.
Why is the Kremlin replicating China's biosecurity surveillance state along with the ruling elites in the West?
The answer is simpler than you think, as all oligarchs throughout the planet are obsessed with sustaining the status quo. It's pretty nice having limitless amounts of dough and the power to micromanage billions of proles.🤑
You start to feel very special and then that emotion eventually devolves into megalomaniac proportions where elites sadistically derive pleasure from arbitrarily manipulating various populations--look no futher than the Ukraine mess where hundreds of thousands of young Russian and Ukrainians are being slaughtered, or the scamdemic slaughter, or the Maui burning, there's always another manufactured crisis where psychopaths can find joy.👿
So given these realities, it would seem obvious all ruling elite scum would find technocratic biometric solutions key to sustaining their power so they can continue having petty internecine battles among themselves.🤖
I guess the question here is whether Russian "elites" want to have their own "independent" dictatorship outside of Mr Global rule (to rule over their own peasants), or they are part of the same happy Global family and are content to be the middle-managers to Mr Global. It's not about them being "democratic" in any scenario. My point is that several smaller dictatorships is slightly preferable to one worldwide dictatorship for a number of reasons, but not sure where these guys like Russia and China are going.
I can’t remember the channel, it was one of the WEF’s, but they do very much state that the ‘New World Order’ will not be as centralized or unipolar as the current one is.
This “process” is exactly the same in the US...using forced technology to get compliance. I am hopeful there are sufficient like-minded people throughout the world to prevent the elite global takeover of our free will as humans. The incremental rise of “world governments” is not a positive precedent however...so how we fight this force is a question that awaits the results of our daily resistance.
&Its very nice to see some higher ups in Russia saying it as well. In this vid you can see the tm channel from the former head of Roscosmos and what he learned when he questioned the obvious US moon landing hoax.
The thing that convinced me it's a hoax is that all evidence of moon landing miraculously "burned". It just does not happen in a country like US and to something so important. Why would you burn all evidence of your greatest achievement?
Moscow's got plenty of USEUNATO bucks to pay for the kind of "poetry" bullshit peddlers like this Cerise character constantly produce out of their rear end:
"EU set to import record volume of Russian LNG – data"
Holohoax dogma-doubting is punishable with prison time in both France and Russia too, surely CBDCs will make it more difficult to enforce that kind of measures too...
Now, what they gonna do to your cyberwallet when you doubt their plandemics and "vaccinnes?"
I had been very surprised to read this analysis from a man who was telling that the real "great replacement" was not about migrants replacing Europeans but the transhumanist mindset which planed to replace Humans by high technologies.
Accepting the evidence produced by the host of that wonderful slavsquating blog or high level Nicolas Bonnal's site https://nicolasbonnal.wordpress.com/ is at first sight very depressing, to say the least. BUT, if we realize and understand that there are resistance worldwide, beyond the apparent divisions (Russia/NATO, BRICS/G20, etc...) to the insane, lethal, technocratic agenda which I coined "technopathic", we Humans, wherever we are, could try to unite our force and weakness to, at least, endeavour to stop it.
As to translate this article... It will take time since I have no suscription to DeepL and I will have to translate bit by bit...
Right now, I will go in the forest to walk, breath after a hard day of labour... i make no promise, but my consciousness is already trying to "shame" me for not starting as soon as possible...
PS: Being quotated close to the bright Monsieur Bonnal is an honor Riley and I encourage all readers to translate his work to understand what I mean. It is a treasure trove of since he often uses litterature to offer perspective on the sad state of affair in our world and in France. His wife is Russian/Ukrainian...
Exemple of one of the last Bonnal's articles (the last one is about Dostoievsky):
Alphonse Toussenel and the first description of globalization
We pretend we're just discovering globalization, but it's a long-standing phenomenon. Voltaire sings of it in Le Mondain (1738). Our wines," he exulted, "intoxicate the sultans...
It became modern, banking and Anglo-Saxon after Waterloo, whose bicentenary we celebrated with our beloved victors.
In 1843, Toussenel described globalization in his pamphlet on the Jews, kings of the age. His poorly-titled book (his target is the reformed Switzerland of the Genevan bankers - the Neckers...) has not aged, since we are living through what Hegel and then Kojève-Fukuyama called the End of History. He adds that British globalization is not for the benefit of the English people - any more than it is for the benefit of the American people today. It is for the benefit of a handful of financiers and shareholders who pull the strings (cf. The Godfather) of theoretically elected governments.
The only change is that England is no longer alone. Since 1918, the United States and the City have been co-ruling the world. They bring countries to heel through world wars or sanctions. They impose laws, subcultures and ideologies, for good or ill. In 1843, the European head of state was already the Tsar.
Toussenel names the six pillars of this permanent domination:
- Enormous debt:
"There was yet another consideration: it was to drag the treasury into mad spending, to force it later to cry misery, and reduce it to the impossibility of not attempting any major undertaking of public utility."
- The rump state benefiting elites alone:
"The theory of government-ulcer is English by birth, since it comes from economists. England is the home of all false principles, all revolutions, all heresies. England is the great store where doctrines and poisonous drugs are prepared and sold with equal success...".
- Permanent war for control of resources:
"England wants custody of all the straits that command the great trade routes of the globe. She aims at fragmentation, because she lives off the tears of the globe; she is Protestant and schismatic in everything: individualism and Protestantism are one and the same."
- Economic ruin through free trade:
"England, by killing work among all peoples, to make them consumers, that is, tributaries of her industry, has killed the wealth of these peoples. The capitalist has put his foot on the throat of both consumer and producer."
- The end of peoples and homelands:
"Under this regime of castes, in fact, there is no people; or else the people is a thing called indifferently the ilote, the slave, the serf, the manant, the Irishman. The soil of the fatherland is now defended only by proletarians.
- Finally, universal cretinization by the press collaborating with the new master
"England wants custody of all the straits that command the great trade routes of the globe. She aims at fragmentation, because she lives off the tears of the globe; she is Protestant and schismatic in everything: individualism and Protestantism are one and the same."
Sorry, I don't know anything similar with Pierre Hillard. He writes great books, with so many relevant references that he has never been sued, even if it is damning for the Kahal's rulers?
I read Mr. Cerise's essay yesterday and came to pretty much the same conclusions as Riley. It is therefore quite possible Riley shamelessly stole his "opinions" from me telepathically. Time to wear a tinfoil hat I suppose.
Assuming no bias, no agenda and clear facts on the table - it never cease to amaze me how two intelligent, educated, experienced people can come to profoundly different conclusions.
But please marvel at what Riley managed to smuggle through Russian customs and used in his article - the name of Audrey Hepburn.. A smidgen of human warmth in globalist horror show.
I've seen some circuitous convoluted arguments before coming from alt media Putin apologists, but Lucien Cerise's essay takes the cake. I bet he gets lots of "likes" from servile Western alt-media consumers. They'll probably argue that once the control apparatus has all Russians thoroughly tagged, they will be safe since the Russian government and the Bank of Russia and Sberbank will have total control of the tags. The frightening inability of these commentators and their consumers to figure their way out of a paper bag placed over the heads is quite disconcerting.
Riley please ask Rolo to not close his blog to non subscribers, because some of us only use cash or debt cards for security reasons for example. It's a waste not spreading his knowledge with us all.
Many thanks to Riley for keeping his blog and knowledge open to us all.
Riley, you are the man. I know Cerise, I am following him for a while. He and other french authors or public figures don't understand a thing about Russia, nor about the nature of reality. Intellectual french tradition is blind to blattant evidences. They always choose the idealistic (and verbalizated ad nauseam) way of apprehending the world. They are trapped in their own cage of words. Pragmatism is the only way of analysing reality. I haven't read 5000 words Cerise's book. And I won't. No time to lose. He tied himself to the same naïve argument as the poor Mathew Erret : Russia knows how to manage technological means (it's weapons against humanity in fact) for the good of humanity. Laughable. Reminds me of socialist propaganda, that almost get Russia (and Eupope, and South America) erased of the world map. So, Cerise, if Cerise is not a globalist agent (Dean Henderson would say a Crown Agent), he is certainly the most nefarious and deconnected author of the century. The french are totally out of subject. Even Bonnal falled in the Happy Russia, Savior of the World. Reality is upside down. Thay are all on the cattle boat. And if nobody don't debunk out lound their depopulation and control plan, yes, the boat will sink, and it will be done of the ancient human race. Hello droids! Keep working Riley. Cerise took the wrong side of the road. Let them cattle each other and played economic and strategic intellectual cataplasms. Otherwise, I can't wait to read Pierre Hillard's essay, the only french writer that I trust. I would be please to translate anything you want to be translated. Just ask. For free. If only I could make a living of translating what I agree with, I would be the happiest man of the universe, and I could forget all the hard handy jobs I have to do.
Riley: I really do appreciate all the effort you put into informing us. Sometimes think that you and others like you, do all the work to set up and maintain the tennis courts, while the rest of us just play ball then walk away. Those who can, help with subscriptions. We cannot all subscribe to all the sites we would like to. In my case, my resources are very limited due to other commitments, so I have to choose carefully where to invest. I simply cannot take advantage, of all the wonderful information available, in areas I am interested in. Nonetheless, having people who are very well informed in specific areas, is a great resource for us all. I do hope that all who serve us, by gathering critical information, gain enough support to more than just survive. Thank you so much for you investment and input. May you be richly rewarded.
When Stephenson made the inaugural run of the first steam engine, a French Science Academician remarked "that's all very well in practice but it doesn't work in theory". Pepe Escobar used to delight in quoting French philosophers, but if you work from theory backwards you wind up being the only one in the room not doubled up with laughter.
Oooh, I like seeing more and more people realize that Russia and USA were never enemies in the true sense. It is all JUST a SPIEL to keep certain schmucks in power. Blood thirsty schmucks. Satanist schmucks.
Bad news, folks. I thought Putin was going to liberate us from the scary biolabs... Oh no....
Pardon my French, but fuck Putin. He could never have enough "vaccines/boosters" for all we should care.
He and his people will pay the price of such foolish beliefs....so many suckers, I am getting a toothache...no, it's probably the vodka....
Hello dear like-minded people, a few reflections on the article discussed, each with a translated quote excerpt:
1. „Two mortal enemies can share the same battlefield and the same weapons, thus resemble each other almost perfectly, and still remain mortal enemies."
Who knows for sure if they are even mortal enemies in this "game"???
2. „Since warfare is now largely computerised, it is not surprising that Russia and the other BRICS countries are also investing in this area - a sine qua non if they want to maintain the balance of power with the West in this area."
Everyone can do that as they wish, after all, one does not have to close oneself off to modern developments, as long as these developments serve the people? And who knows for sure whether this is really about a (ultimately also financial) showdown?
3. „You cannot fight NATO with bows and arrows. Why is that? Because NATO does not attack with bow and arrow. This military alliance and its military-industrial complex impose their choice of weapons for their hybrid warfare on a global scale, all the more easily because it is technology that makes universal history and all are forced to adapt to its rhythm, that of scientific discovery, if only to remain competitive and support the balance of power with equal weapons on the international stage, if only to challenge NATO's agenda."
What a killer argument! One starts war, the other has to join in? By the same means? I'm no expert on these things, but this much my common sense tells me: if the supposed enemy is killing its people with fake pandemics, lockdowns and deadly vaccines, that's one way of waging war, but not against the enemy cited in the article, but with weapons against the population. I really know of NO argument why Putin should then feel compelled to do the same (and it has not yet been proven that Sputnik does not cause similar damage, on the contrary… and even if not: To play the same game means to lie to the people!)
Apart from that, an important aspect is missing: this is about an inhuman ideology that is to be enforced worldwide at the expense of the population. War and technology are only the means to this end.
And so far I have never heard any clear statements from the leading politicians in East or West that call this ideology by its name, expose it, question it, let alone reject it! There would have been enough time for this for years, but ALL have kept silent in front of the people and let them run into their misfortune, after having actively orchestrated it in the meantime.
Putin included.
And one last thought that came to me while reading this article: unfortunately, it reminds me very much of what has been and is being addressed in the MSM as a message to the population, namely that this is about a war between West against East, because that is precisely what serves people's conventional ideas all too easily. And unfortunately it also fits all too well with PsyOps like Q, for example, in which people are led to believe Hopium is a good guy who has to go along with all this because that's the only way to save humanity.
Conclusion: poor Putin can't help it, he is forced to go along. But… wait: he is perhaps playing 5D-chess, too complicated for the „useless eater“ 🥳
No, seriously, the author has apparently consumed too much of Goethe's sorcerer's apprentice, the (technological) ghosts we called, we now can't get rid of?!? So responsibility no longer exists? Humanism adé? We are all victims? The whole thing is so ridiculous!🤦♀️
Fantastic comment, thanks Petra.
riley
Hello, Riley. I made you a question some hours ago about my suspicion that the BRICS are going to make a show next year, withdrawing from the WHO but only to make later their own "WHO" and to continúe the vaxxing and the masking and the lockdowns and whatever else they need to surrender their
masses through "health emergencies"... but always respecting "sovereignity" and "multipolarity", of course...
My question for you is if my suspicion have some sense and, if it does, what could be the strategy they will use to accomplish that move, or what signs already exist that they are moving toward that path.
It is important for me because I know some people that is precisely expecting the BRICS to do so, but they are pretending that a move like this will just confirm that Putin & Co are the saviors of Humanity...
Thanks.
Riley, I suspect that the BRICS team will make a show in 2024 and withdraw from WHO, but --of course-- only to form their own "health organization" and continue doing the same thing on their own....
What do you think about it?
Thanks for your answer.
Hey Carmen,
Anything is possible. Personally, I think BRICS leaving the WHO is unlikely because that would contradict everything they've been saying for the last decade or so (WHO as main instrument for ensuring "global health", and BRICS' preoccupation with global governance in general). But we'll see.
Thanks for your answer. And I apologize because I forgot to clarify that I was referring to the WHO's Pandemic Treaty issue.
I remember Jair Bolsonaro making some noise in this sense almost two years ago, when he still was the President of Brazil. And when the war with Ukraine began last year, I read about some rumors that the BRICS were not going to participate in any organization supported by the NATO guys and in any Treaty that "put in danger the sovereignity of nations"...
So, if the BRICS team has been created to offer a (false) alternative to the public, to promote the dellusional "Multipolarity World Order" and to appear as the "Revenge Team"... well, signing the Pandemic Treaty will not help them with that image.
Of course, as I said before, any withdrawing from the WHO by the BRICS --if it actually occurs-- will be just a show, because they will continue doing the same things they are doing now (vaxxing, masking, imposing biometrics and AI technocracy...), but in a more "sovereign" way... hehehe
Well, now that I clarify more my question, what do you think? Is that possible, the BRICS withdrawing from the WHO's Pandemic Treaty at some point in the future?
Thanks again for your answer.
It's very similar to the Trump "story" - yes, he did promote vaccines, but that's because blah-blah-blah, he is playing 5D-chess, etc. Either all these '"saviors"(Trump, Putin, etc) are not that sharp, if they allow themselves to be outsmarted, or they are lying.
Absolutely, same story! But no one talks about the fact that politics has to be done for the well-being of the population; it is not discussed at all. It is so absurd that decisions are being made here over the heads of the people for the sole purpose of profit, even though those in power have the damned job of governing for the good of the people. It's all so perverse now that as a citizen I can only say: NO, I'm not taking part!
We need to learn to survive without polititians.
They may be both incompetent and liars/traitors.
They do what they are payed for. And they are doing a good job. It's just not you paying them.
Sure, in the end you pay for everything, But this is part of the Advanced Course.
Both, far from reality. They have become a completely unsustainable caste for far too long. Not only useless for us, but extremely harmful.
"And so far I have never heard any clear statements from the leading politicians in East or West that call this ideology by its name, expose it, question it, let alone reject it!"
People are led to believe that elections matter, that elected politicians represent the will of the people and they will do the best for the country. Nothing can be further from the truth. Politicians are 99% just fronts for the elites, to give you a) illusion of choice b) not to let people know they literally have owners, as Carlin said. Politicians are there to do the bidding of the elites, not what the nation needs, and therefore politicians will never speak up against the very plan they have been employed and handsomely paid to implement.
Let's help ourselves with an example, your neighbor - Czechia:
Czech government manifesto clearly states they are not going to raise taxes, they are going to heavily support education, and that they are against immigration. Sounds good and pinky promise!
Today they announced that education budget will be actually cut by 0.5billion euro, recently they agreed to EU Migration Pact, and already raised various taxes..
Why would politicians completely betray their voters and ruin their careers, why it almost looks like some political parties in Europe are created with pre-selected expiration date, only to be replaced by some new parties with fresh faces with even better lies?
It is all part of the plan and politicians dutifully carry this plan out. Every sane person knows that investment in nation's children is smart, but the elites do not want clever nation to question their every decision - they want simple, obedient workers permanently hypnotized by media propaganda. Taxes are raised to further decimate small businesses and households, already ravaged by covid and inflation. And migration = death of Europe.
I can understand you very well, it’s the same here in Germany, all goes down…. We need courage to survive the next month, years… and I really wish we could ally even better against this madness!
We can. Cause and effect is the answer. A Universal Principle.
After the Covid madness, I believe anything can be done to us who like to think by our own heads. We will be turned into the XXI century witches burned at the stake.
I agree, they are unrestrained when it comes to their goals, as the last three years at the latest have clearly shown. It doesn't look like a rosy future at all😏
I only see survival with some kind of liberty by living below their radar. That's the main reason why i only use cash and not credit cards, by that way i can't be a paid sub in any substack, because we can't use cash to have access. The guys Riley and Rolo should take that into account when they close access to non paying readers.
"1. „Two mortal enemies can share the same battlefield and the same weapons, thus resemble each other almost perfectly, and still remain mortal enemies."
Who knows for sure if they are even mortal enemies in this "game"???"
Obviously the weapons we are talking about here do nothing against the 'enemy'. They only target the population. So I think it's save to say they are not enemies. We, the plebs, are their common enemy. And it's a war them against us.
I totally agree👍🏼
Why is the Kremlin replicating China's biosecurity surveillance state along with the ruling elites in the West?
The answer is simpler than you think, as all oligarchs throughout the planet are obsessed with sustaining the status quo. It's pretty nice having limitless amounts of dough and the power to micromanage billions of proles.🤑
You start to feel very special and then that emotion eventually devolves into megalomaniac proportions where elites sadistically derive pleasure from arbitrarily manipulating various populations--look no futher than the Ukraine mess where hundreds of thousands of young Russian and Ukrainians are being slaughtered, or the scamdemic slaughter, or the Maui burning, there's always another manufactured crisis where psychopaths can find joy.👿
So given these realities, it would seem obvious all ruling elite scum would find technocratic biometric solutions key to sustaining their power so they can continue having petty internecine battles among themselves.🤖
I guess the question here is whether Russian "elites" want to have their own "independent" dictatorship outside of Mr Global rule (to rule over their own peasants), or they are part of the same happy Global family and are content to be the middle-managers to Mr Global. It's not about them being "democratic" in any scenario. My point is that several smaller dictatorships is slightly preferable to one worldwide dictatorship for a number of reasons, but not sure where these guys like Russia and China are going.
What you're describing is multipolarism--regional managers of Global Governance who can much more effectively control the proles.
If they all report to one Global Governance, doesn't it make it Unipolar?
It's the same crap under a more palatable name needed to herd the reticent proles.
I’m inclined to agree.
I can’t remember the channel, it was one of the WEF’s, but they do very much state that the ‘New World Order’ will not be as centralized or unipolar as the current one is.
then it's all by design, not a result of some "fight"
This “process” is exactly the same in the US...using forced technology to get compliance. I am hopeful there are sufficient like-minded people throughout the world to prevent the elite global takeover of our free will as humans. The incremental rise of “world governments” is not a positive precedent however...so how we fight this force is a question that awaits the results of our daily resistance.
You nailed it Margaret! Stay strong and flexible!
Those first couple sentences were poetry
And there is the crux of it all! Russia and USA are NOT enemies.
They are friends.
Friends in government, ENEMIES TO ALL THE PEOPLE!
Now *that's* poetry.
&Its very nice to see some higher ups in Russia saying it as well. In this vid you can see the tm channel from the former head of Roscosmos and what he learned when he questioned the obvious US moon landing hoax.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0eXcPmRLI8
The thing that convinced me it's a hoax is that all evidence of moon landing miraculously "burned". It just does not happen in a country like US and to something so important. Why would you burn all evidence of your greatest achievement?
Moscow's got plenty of USEUNATO bucks to pay for the kind of "poetry" bullshit peddlers like this Cerise character constantly produce out of their rear end:
"EU set to import record volume of Russian LNG – data"
https://www.rt.com/business/582086-eu-russia-lng-imports-record-high/
Holohoax dogma-doubting is punishable with prison time in both France and Russia too, surely CBDCs will make it more difficult to enforce that kind of measures too...
Now, what they gonna do to your cyberwallet when you doubt their plandemics and "vaccinnes?"
You seem to have completely misinterpreted/misrepresented what I was saying.
Very good answer to Lucien Cerise's article.
I had been very surprised to read this analysis from a man who was telling that the real "great replacement" was not about migrants replacing Europeans but the transhumanist mindset which planed to replace Humans by high technologies.
Accepting the evidence produced by the host of that wonderful slavsquating blog or high level Nicolas Bonnal's site https://nicolasbonnal.wordpress.com/ is at first sight very depressing, to say the least. BUT, if we realize and understand that there are resistance worldwide, beyond the apparent divisions (Russia/NATO, BRICS/G20, etc...) to the insane, lethal, technocratic agenda which I coined "technopathic", we Humans, wherever we are, could try to unite our force and weakness to, at least, endeavour to stop it.
As to translate this article... It will take time since I have no suscription to DeepL and I will have to translate bit by bit...
Right now, I will go in the forest to walk, breath after a hard day of labour... i make no promise, but my consciousness is already trying to "shame" me for not starting as soon as possible...
PS: Being quotated close to the bright Monsieur Bonnal is an honor Riley and I encourage all readers to translate his work to understand what I mean. It is a treasure trove of since he often uses litterature to offer perspective on the sad state of affair in our world and in France. His wife is Russian/Ukrainian...
Exemple of one of the last Bonnal's articles (the last one is about Dostoievsky):
Alphonse Toussenel and the first description of globalization
We pretend we're just discovering globalization, but it's a long-standing phenomenon. Voltaire sings of it in Le Mondain (1738). Our wines," he exulted, "intoxicate the sultans...
It became modern, banking and Anglo-Saxon after Waterloo, whose bicentenary we celebrated with our beloved victors.
In 1843, Toussenel described globalization in his pamphlet on the Jews, kings of the age. His poorly-titled book (his target is the reformed Switzerland of the Genevan bankers - the Neckers...) has not aged, since we are living through what Hegel and then Kojève-Fukuyama called the End of History. He adds that British globalization is not for the benefit of the English people - any more than it is for the benefit of the American people today. It is for the benefit of a handful of financiers and shareholders who pull the strings (cf. The Godfather) of theoretically elected governments.
The only change is that England is no longer alone. Since 1918, the United States and the City have been co-ruling the world. They bring countries to heel through world wars or sanctions. They impose laws, subcultures and ideologies, for good or ill. In 1843, the European head of state was already the Tsar.
Toussenel names the six pillars of this permanent domination:
- Enormous debt:
"There was yet another consideration: it was to drag the treasury into mad spending, to force it later to cry misery, and reduce it to the impossibility of not attempting any major undertaking of public utility."
- The rump state benefiting elites alone:
"The theory of government-ulcer is English by birth, since it comes from economists. England is the home of all false principles, all revolutions, all heresies. England is the great store where doctrines and poisonous drugs are prepared and sold with equal success...".
- Permanent war for control of resources:
"England wants custody of all the straits that command the great trade routes of the globe. She aims at fragmentation, because she lives off the tears of the globe; she is Protestant and schismatic in everything: individualism and Protestantism are one and the same."
- Economic ruin through free trade:
"England, by killing work among all peoples, to make them consumers, that is, tributaries of her industry, has killed the wealth of these peoples. The capitalist has put his foot on the throat of both consumer and producer."
- The end of peoples and homelands:
"Under this regime of castes, in fact, there is no people; or else the people is a thing called indifferently the ilote, the slave, the serf, the manant, the Irishman. The soil of the fatherland is now defended only by proletarians.
- Finally, universal cretinization by the press collaborating with the new master
"England wants custody of all the straits that command the great trade routes of the globe. She aims at fragmentation, because she lives off the tears of the globe; she is Protestant and schismatic in everything: individualism and Protestantism are one and the same."
Thanks for the link to Bonnal's work, I was just going to ask for it. Is there something similar for Pierre Hillard?
I found his twitter and a juicy Wiki on him:
https://twitter.com/PierreHillard
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Hillard
Hello Observer,
Sorry, I don't know anything similar with Pierre Hillard. He writes great books, with so many relevant references that he has never been sued, even if it is damning for the Kahal's rulers?
I read Mr. Cerise's essay yesterday and came to pretty much the same conclusions as Riley. It is therefore quite possible Riley shamelessly stole his "opinions" from me telepathically. Time to wear a tinfoil hat I suppose.
Assuming no bias, no agenda and clear facts on the table - it never cease to amaze me how two intelligent, educated, experienced people can come to profoundly different conclusions.
But please marvel at what Riley managed to smuggle through Russian customs and used in his article - the name of Audrey Hepburn.. A smidgen of human warmth in globalist horror show.
I've seen some circuitous convoluted arguments before coming from alt media Putin apologists, but Lucien Cerise's essay takes the cake. I bet he gets lots of "likes" from servile Western alt-media consumers. They'll probably argue that once the control apparatus has all Russians thoroughly tagged, they will be safe since the Russian government and the Bank of Russia and Sberbank will have total control of the tags. The frightening inability of these commentators and their consumers to figure their way out of a paper bag placed over the heads is quite disconcerting.
Thanks for your comment, Jeffrey.
Not sure Lucien's essay takes the cake. A turd, perhaps.
Rhone, it's a figure of speech, meaning "the most remarkable or foolish of its kind."
If you can't call a spade a spade, there is something wrong about your ideas and convictions.
Riley please ask Rolo to not close his blog to non subscribers, because some of us only use cash or debt cards for security reasons for example. It's a waste not spreading his knowledge with us all.
Many thanks to Riley for keeping his blog and knowledge open to us all.
Riley, you are the man. I know Cerise, I am following him for a while. He and other french authors or public figures don't understand a thing about Russia, nor about the nature of reality. Intellectual french tradition is blind to blattant evidences. They always choose the idealistic (and verbalizated ad nauseam) way of apprehending the world. They are trapped in their own cage of words. Pragmatism is the only way of analysing reality. I haven't read 5000 words Cerise's book. And I won't. No time to lose. He tied himself to the same naïve argument as the poor Mathew Erret : Russia knows how to manage technological means (it's weapons against humanity in fact) for the good of humanity. Laughable. Reminds me of socialist propaganda, that almost get Russia (and Eupope, and South America) erased of the world map. So, Cerise, if Cerise is not a globalist agent (Dean Henderson would say a Crown Agent), he is certainly the most nefarious and deconnected author of the century. The french are totally out of subject. Even Bonnal falled in the Happy Russia, Savior of the World. Reality is upside down. Thay are all on the cattle boat. And if nobody don't debunk out lound their depopulation and control plan, yes, the boat will sink, and it will be done of the ancient human race. Hello droids! Keep working Riley. Cerise took the wrong side of the road. Let them cattle each other and played economic and strategic intellectual cataplasms. Otherwise, I can't wait to read Pierre Hillard's essay, the only french writer that I trust. I would be please to translate anything you want to be translated. Just ask. For free. If only I could make a living of translating what I agree with, I would be the happiest man of the universe, and I could forget all the hard handy jobs I have to do.
Appreciate that, Louis! And as always, thanks for reading :)
riley
Riley, your article has also been published there:
https://olivierdemeulenaere.wordpress.com/2023/09/21/la-russie-doit-reduire-lecart-dans-le-domaine-du-marquage-de-betail/
And there: https://nicolasbonnal.wordpress.com/2023/09/19/la-russie-pratique-le-666-a-plein-pot-la-reponse-nourrie-4600-mots-de-slavsquat-a-cerise-defenseur-du-poutinisme-numerique-je-suis-cite-dans-ce-texte-en-realite-la-bete-numerique-nmr/
Riley: I really do appreciate all the effort you put into informing us. Sometimes think that you and others like you, do all the work to set up and maintain the tennis courts, while the rest of us just play ball then walk away. Those who can, help with subscriptions. We cannot all subscribe to all the sites we would like to. In my case, my resources are very limited due to other commitments, so I have to choose carefully where to invest. I simply cannot take advantage, of all the wonderful information available, in areas I am interested in. Nonetheless, having people who are very well informed in specific areas, is a great resource for us all. I do hope that all who serve us, by gathering critical information, gain enough support to more than just survive. Thank you so much for you investment and input. May you be richly rewarded.
When Stephenson made the inaugural run of the first steam engine, a French Science Academician remarked "that's all very well in practice but it doesn't work in theory". Pepe Escobar used to delight in quoting French philosophers, but if you work from theory backwards you wind up being the only one in the room not doubled up with laughter.
Nicolas Bonnal will publish that article as well as other websites to which he is connected. All I have to do now is to translate...
I've finished the work... i'll give news as to the links...
Thanks, Bugey!
riley
I added a Glengould interpretation of a Bach's fugue at the end! Nicolas has just received it...
Perfect :)
Et voilà!
https://nouveau-monde.ca/la-russie-doit-combler-le-fosse-en-matiere-de-marquage-de-betail/
awesome! Thanks again my friend!
The Bach 's fugue has not been included...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKMUeNWqBXs
I keep coming back to that scene in Spinal Tap, "but ours goes to 11."
Oooh, I like seeing more and more people realize that Russia and USA were never enemies in the true sense. It is all JUST a SPIEL to keep certain schmucks in power. Blood thirsty schmucks. Satanist schmucks.
Walking dead schmucks.