104 Comments

Bad news, folks. I thought Putin was going to liberate us from the scary biolabs... Oh no....

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

Hello dear like-minded people, a few reflections on the article discussed, each with a translated quote excerpt:

1. „Two mortal enemies can share the same battlefield and the same weapons, thus resemble each other almost perfectly, and still remain mortal enemies."

Who knows for sure if they are even mortal enemies in this "game"???

2. „Since warfare is now largely computerised, it is not surprising that Russia and the other BRICS countries are also investing in this area - a sine qua non if they want to maintain the balance of power with the West in this area."

Everyone can do that as they wish, after all, one does not have to close oneself off to modern developments, as long as these developments serve the people? And who knows for sure whether this is really about a (ultimately also financial) showdown?

3. „You cannot fight NATO with bows and arrows. Why is that? Because NATO does not attack with bow and arrow. This military alliance and its military-industrial complex impose their choice of weapons for their hybrid warfare on a global scale, all the more easily because it is technology that makes universal history and all are forced to adapt to its rhythm, that of scientific discovery, if only to remain competitive and support the balance of power with equal weapons on the international stage, if only to challenge NATO's agenda."

What a killer argument! One starts war, the other has to join in? By the same means? I'm no expert on these things, but this much my common sense tells me: if the supposed enemy is killing its people with fake pandemics, lockdowns and deadly vaccines, that's one way of waging war, but not against the enemy cited in the article, but with weapons against the population. I really know of NO argument why Putin should then feel compelled to do the same (and it has not yet been proven that Sputnik does not cause similar damage, on the contrary… and even if not: To play the same game means to lie to the people!)

Apart from that, an important aspect is missing: this is about an inhuman ideology that is to be enforced worldwide at the expense of the population. War and technology are only the means to this end.

And so far I have never heard any clear statements from the leading politicians in East or West that call this ideology by its name, expose it, question it, let alone reject it! There would have been enough time for this for years, but ALL have kept silent in front of the people and let them run into their misfortune, after having actively orchestrated it in the meantime.

Putin included.

And one last thought that came to me while reading this article: unfortunately, it reminds me very much of what has been and is being addressed in the MSM as a message to the population, namely that this is about a war between West against East, because that is precisely what serves people's conventional ideas all too easily. And unfortunately it also fits all too well with PsyOps like Q, for example, in which people are led to believe Hopium is a good guy who has to go along with all this because that's the only way to save humanity.

Conclusion: poor Putin can't help it, he is forced to go along. But… wait: he is perhaps playing 5D-chess, too complicated for the „useless eater“ 🥳

No, seriously, the author has apparently consumed too much of Goethe's sorcerer's apprentice, the (technological) ghosts we called, we now can't get rid of?!? So responsibility no longer exists? Humanism adé? We are all victims? The whole thing is so ridiculous!🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

Why is the Kremlin replicating China's biosecurity surveillance state along with the ruling elites in the West?

The answer is simpler than you think, as all oligarchs throughout the planet are obsessed with sustaining the status quo. It's pretty nice having limitless amounts of dough and the power to micromanage billions of proles.🤑

You start to feel very special and then that emotion eventually devolves into megalomaniac proportions where elites sadistically derive pleasure from arbitrarily manipulating various populations--look no futher than the Ukraine mess where hundreds of thousands of young Russian and Ukrainians are being slaughtered, or the scamdemic slaughter, or the Maui burning, there's always another manufactured crisis where psychopaths can find joy.👿

So given these realities, it would seem obvious all ruling elite scum would find technocratic biometric solutions key to sustaining their power so they can continue having petty internecine battles among themselves.🤖

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

This “process” is exactly the same in the US...using forced technology to get compliance. I am hopeful there are sufficient like-minded people throughout the world to prevent the elite global takeover of our free will as humans. The incremental rise of “world governments” is not a positive precedent however...so how we fight this force is a question that awaits the results of our daily resistance.

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

Those first couple sentences were poetry

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

Very good answer to Lucien Cerise's article.

I had been very surprised to read this analysis from a man who was telling that the real "great replacement" was not about migrants replacing Europeans but the transhumanist mindset which planed to replace Humans by high technologies.

Accepting the evidence produced by the host of that wonderful slavsquating blog or high level Nicolas Bonnal's site https://nicolasbonnal.wordpress.com/ is at first sight very depressing, to say the least. BUT, if we realize and understand that there are resistance worldwide, beyond the apparent divisions (Russia/NATO, BRICS/G20, etc...) to the insane, lethal, technocratic agenda which I coined "technopathic", we Humans, wherever we are, could try to unite our force and weakness to, at least, endeavour to stop it.

As to translate this article... It will take time since I have no suscription to DeepL and I will have to translate bit by bit...

Right now, I will go in the forest to walk, breath after a hard day of labour... i make no promise, but my consciousness is already trying to "shame" me for not starting as soon as possible...

PS: Being quotated close to the bright Monsieur Bonnal is an honor Riley and I encourage all readers to translate his work to understand what I mean. It is a treasure trove of since he often uses litterature to offer perspective on the sad state of affair in our world and in France. His wife is Russian/Ukrainian...

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

I read Mr. Cerise's essay yesterday and came to pretty much the same conclusions as Riley. It is therefore quite possible Riley shamelessly stole his "opinions" from me telepathically. Time to wear a tinfoil hat I suppose.

Assuming no bias, no agenda and clear facts on the table - it never cease to amaze me how two intelligent, educated, experienced people can come to profoundly different conclusions.

But please marvel at what Riley managed to smuggle through Russian customs and used in his article - the name of Audrey Hepburn.. A smidgen of human warmth in globalist horror show.

Expand full comment

I've seen some circuitous convoluted arguments before coming from alt media Putin apologists, but Lucien Cerise's essay takes the cake. I bet he gets lots of "likes" from servile Western alt-media consumers. They'll probably argue that once the control apparatus has all Russians thoroughly tagged, they will be safe since the Russian government and the Bank of Russia and Sberbank will have total control of the tags. The frightening inability of these commentators and their consumers to figure their way out of a paper bag placed over the heads is quite disconcerting.

Expand full comment

Riley please ask Rolo to not close his blog to non subscribers, because some of us only use cash or debt cards for security reasons for example. It's a waste not spreading his knowledge with us all.

Many thanks to Riley for keeping his blog and knowledge open to us all.

Expand full comment

Riley, you are the man. I know Cerise, I am following him for a while. He and other french authors or public figures don't understand a thing about Russia, nor about the nature of reality. Intellectual french tradition is blind to blattant evidences. They always choose the idealistic (and verbalizated ad nauseam) way of apprehending the world. They are trapped in their own cage of words. Pragmatism is the only way of analysing reality. I haven't read 5000 words Cerise's book. And I won't. No time to lose. He tied himself to the same naïve argument as the poor Mathew Erret : Russia knows how to manage technological means (it's weapons against humanity in fact) for the good of humanity. Laughable. Reminds me of socialist propaganda, that almost get Russia (and Eupope, and South America) erased of the world map. So, Cerise, if Cerise is not a globalist agent (Dean Henderson would say a Crown Agent), he is certainly the most nefarious and deconnected author of the century. The french are totally out of subject. Even Bonnal falled in the Happy Russia, Savior of the World. Reality is upside down. Thay are all on the cattle boat. And if nobody don't debunk out lound their depopulation and control plan, yes, the boat will sink, and it will be done of the ancient human race. Hello droids! Keep working Riley. Cerise took the wrong side of the road. Let them cattle each other and played economic and strategic intellectual cataplasms. Otherwise, I can't wait to read Pierre Hillard's essay, the only french writer that I trust. I would be please to translate anything you want to be translated. Just ask. For free. If only I could make a living of translating what I agree with, I would be the happiest man of the universe, and I could forget all the hard handy jobs I have to do.

Expand full comment
Sep 21, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

Riley: I really do appreciate all the effort you put into informing us. Sometimes think that you and others like you, do all the work to set up and maintain the tennis courts, while the rest of us just play ball then walk away. Those who can, help with subscriptions. We cannot all subscribe to all the sites we would like to. In my case, my resources are very limited due to other commitments, so I have to choose carefully where to invest. I simply cannot take advantage, of all the wonderful information available, in areas I am interested in. Nonetheless, having people who are very well informed in specific areas, is a great resource for us all. I do hope that all who serve us, by gathering critical information, gain enough support to more than just survive. Thank you so much for you investment and input. May you be richly rewarded.

Expand full comment
founding

When Stephenson made the inaugural run of the first steam engine, a French Science Academician remarked "that's all very well in practice but it doesn't work in theory". Pepe Escobar used to delight in quoting French philosophers, but if you work from theory backwards you wind up being the only one in the room not doubled up with laughter.

Expand full comment
Sep 19, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

Nicolas Bonnal will publish that article as well as other websites to which he is connected. All I have to do now is to translate...

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

I keep coming back to that scene in Spinal Tap, "but ours goes to 11."

Expand full comment

Oooh, I like seeing more and more people realize that Russia and USA were never enemies in the true sense. It is all JUST a SPIEL to keep certain schmucks in power. Blood thirsty schmucks. Satanist schmucks.

Walking dead schmucks.

Expand full comment