I read history. I write history. I live and breathe history. This give me certain advantages. Context for me is a vast and colourful three-dimentional backdrop.
For example, I see my quasi-literate albeit good-hearted countrymen protest loudly against the totalitarian oppressors with dedicated and brave non-violence. This is how it starts and ends with them. They are certain that peaceful non-violent protest will melt the hearts of pschopaths.
I shake my head, because I see a wider battlefield; one in which chicanes and pitfalls were laid many decades ago.
For those who believe that Law is the measure of mankind's wisdom and justice, the elite sowed constitutions and bills of rights. That the word DEMOCRACY was excised from every draft constitution has yet to be noticed.
Then came the City of London's pawn, Mohandas Gandhi, who was cultivated and nurtured as the champion of non-violent protest, demanding from the might of the British Empire they they permit India to gain independence. As so many Indians and Africans shouted loudly but futilely, that Gandhi was a racist and elitist, and that the British Raj had already decided to allow independence and new controls had already been put in place, the entire stage show was guided through the streets of London and the dusty paths of India, with Gandhi performing brilliantly.
This was a stage set for a future confrontation, many times postponed until, eventially, 2020. But it was not the only one. Martin Luthor king also was set up to reinforce the "Non-violent peaceful protest" message . Although even some protagonists were skeptical, the entire world ignored CIA, FBI, National Guard, and special police emascultation of the white supremicist's resistance and violence, and accepted that black rights was achieved by "non-violent peaceful protest".
Naturally, as was Gandhi, King was assassinated, to round off the entire aura of martyredom.
It worked.
Today, Globalists can scarcely believe their own eyes when they see a gigantic segment of mankind being herded into the jab chambers and stoically refusing to attack their murderers.
I do not wish to challenge your assertions here about Gandhi and King being pawns. I get the gist and it may well be the truth.
But I'll say that the current belief that passive resistance is the One True Way probably owes as much to being indoctrinated to comply to institutional authority from kindergarten through high school, and also, the belief (naive imo) that voting is a genuine way to bring about governance that truly advances the commonwealth.... let me replace the 'wealth' in that word with 'well-being'.
"Democracy is chaos with ballot urns." Thomas Carlyle
Astute of you, Bosco, but you have nudged me down an even more bumpy road... ballot urns have nothing to do with democracy. As any of the tens of thousands of participants in the American 1870s-80s Populist Movement could have told us, Lincoln had it right with his lyrical definition "Government of the people, by the people and for the people".
This means exactly what it says... the people formulate policy through local, regional and national consensus, which is then implemented by the Public Service. The vast construct inserted so forceably into public discourse to prevent consensus government by the people, is the absurdity of candidates, representatives, elections, majorities, voting, debate, and parliaments or congresses.
These are designd to obstruct the "will of the people", not lubricate that.
There is a reason that every celebrity is recorded as cherishing "Our Precious Democracy" whether or not he actually uttered these words. And in case zealots poke me in the ribs and quote history, at almost 80 years, I can say that my very active experience on this planet provided me with crystal-clear memories that are at 99% varience to the 'histories' taught to tertiary students and graduates today. "History" now is what we called "revisionism" 60 years ago.
I get that. The prob, as ever, is trust and verification. Also, the process of forming those layers of consensuses (I wanna say consensii; can I, please?) is itself tricky. Anything larger than the monkeysphere -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number -- reduces verified trust, and from there, it rolls downhill fast.
I do not believe the popular notion that homo sapiens can govern itself harmoniously in groups larger than that of the standard Neolithic tribe.
One of my fave old jokes has something to say about this albeit from a deliberately absurd perspective:
this elephant would get sloshed on Saturday nights and on its way home deliberately stagger through the termite mounts and smash them down.
The termites decided to fight back. Strength in numbers and all that.
Next Sat night, elephant comes stomping through and finds itself ambushed by ten godzillion termites jumping on it from the surrounding trees.
Briefly, it is shook by the collective mass of termites, but gets back to its knees and shakes them off like a dog after a bath.
One termite is left clinging to the elephant's dewlap. It's fellow termites, seeing this loner bravely and tenaciously continuing the fight, holler, "Choke him!"
Wolf pack size can range from 2 to 36 wolves, with the average pack size consisting of 6 wolves. Lion prides range from two to 40 lions. Elephants live in herds of 20 to 70 individuals.
Humans think they can govern themselves sanely, safely, and harmoniously in groups of 10K to pushing 8 billion. We can't. Whatever ideal of governing system one applies will fail. I agree with conservatives like Curtis Yarvin -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin -- that the only form of governance that can even remotely work is monarchy. I agree simply because it emulates basic pack behavior: one uber alpha male to bind them together.
Of course they tend to last only for 1-3 successions, and for me to promote monarchy is really more a perverse sentimental affectation on my part, because really, I promote no form of governance over another. Governments morph and change via enormous, powerful, and very rapid Darwinian social pressures and generally run all over the road and cause massive collisions on a reliably regular basis.
We still have neolithic minds/hearts but now with ICBM nukes, gene sequencers, and handroid hypnotic celldrones. I see cellphones taking their human pets for walks every day. I think cellphones are aliens from another star system or dimension who've chosen to dominate our lives without us knowing it.
Bosco... I think I can counter those arguments. If you email me tonyryan43@gmail.com I can send you a PDF version of a novel I wrote that is still with the publishers and thus is free. It is the outcome of 56 years research.
Oh, it's not something I wish to debate, per se. I was just clarifying my position. Now that I'm about recovered from my last surgery, I have a novel or 3 I need to finish and throw at some publishers to see if anyone bites. so I'll have to pass for now, oz. The eyes are old and so am I. But if there is a modest section of chapters that make your primary point, I would be willing to read that much, so I'll ping you.
Sounds good to me. The chapter where the old ceremony men tell me about their 24,000 year old decision-making protocols will give you food for thought. Good luck with your own books.
I beg to differ! Bill Gates is NOT a freak! Your government is! Everything was done, has been done and being done to us ALL BY GOVERNMENTS!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus or anyone else CANNOT DO A THING to you and me without our own governments!
That's WHY ALL GOVERNMENTS join the so-called "global pandemic treaty".
PS
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and their ilk did not murder millions people in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not order their thugs (a.k.a cops and soldiers) beat people up, shoot people sown for not wearing farcical diapers!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not destroy people livelihoods for NOT TAKING the clot-shot!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not murder Russians, Ukrainians in the current "war of distraction" in Ukraine.
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have not done a thing to Russians with the clot-shot, it's Russian Government! Stupid!
This doctor is naïve if not a useful idiot!
Fighting the NWO without fighting your own government is futile and plain stupidity!
" Under these controls, they will live worse than slaves." Not just our children, but we ourselves. This is happening VERY fast, new steps being implemented daily. These are the digital Enclosures, or rather the digital chapter of The Enclosures, which started in late medieval England, and have gone on since then. They won't stop till capital controls every micron of every human being and every entity in the natural world. We are being herded into their Blockchain global mind hive. Thanks so much for this, Riley, the good doctor nails it here.
"Everyone is so happy and delighted that they collect cryptocurrencies, that they have cards, that they easily pay with mobile phones. These are all links of the same chain. This is one big concentration camp. You didn't get an injection? Nothing works for you and it won’t work. You can't leave the house. If someone thinks that this is nonsense, then please ask: what is happening now in China?"
People who are not of the masses and mobs can exhibit eccentricities. The manner of speaking, thinking, acting and feeling are different from the imitative masses.
This incites the fury of masses and mobs, when someone strays from the beaten path of what is commonly accepted, there must be something wrong with him. So in the comment section on this blog, which is supposed to be about freedom..., we have mere slander and gossip of people who apply a psychological label (psychopath) and other insulting terms, from freak to 'Anti-Christ', including people who apparently set themselves up as psychologists. It happens on many blogs which are supposed to be about freedom.
Gates' eccentricities have nothing to do with his position of extreme power and his views, which should be the point of debate, to mention his eccentricities in public media means to incite envy, intolerance and prejudice, which stinks. It is agitation against a person on the basis of his most personal traits. Thé foremost trespassing against the freedom of the individual.
I am sure that Edward Slavsquat didn't aim at it though, but inciting judgemental hatred on the basis of personal traits is the result. So perhaps he should think twice next time, imagine himself or someone he loves to be the subject of slander might help. Not everything what they say in Russia is worth to translate. The doctor is not asked to give an analysis of individual traits and the personal neurology of Gates, such an analysis should remain between doctor and client, and if he can't help to practice such analysis on what is not his client, he should keep it indoors.
The vintage Soviet nyet photo from alcohol to Sputnik V is an awesome caption. I am determine to encourage and inspire college students to think for themselves about the dangers of this WHO plandemic/scamdemic treaty as well as the danger from ALL injections. The original transcript in Russian with Doctor Denis Ivanov would be appreciated and I would like your permission to hand out as flyers with your original conversation transcript to college students in Minsk. Thank you for your defense of our freedom!
right now I see no urge here in my country of a 4th dose, or yearly mRNA vaccinations. It feels like the third ("booster") jab was the last one. The vaxx pass is not asked anymore except for very few places.
Yet as monkeypox and the turbo avian flu spread in foreign lands, the writing is clearly on the wall for what is coming
We very, very much like Dr. Dennis and you too Riley💕
Denis Ivanov is cool. Always composed, common sense, highly knowledgeable individual.
I read history. I write history. I live and breathe history. This give me certain advantages. Context for me is a vast and colourful three-dimentional backdrop.
For example, I see my quasi-literate albeit good-hearted countrymen protest loudly against the totalitarian oppressors with dedicated and brave non-violence. This is how it starts and ends with them. They are certain that peaceful non-violent protest will melt the hearts of pschopaths.
I shake my head, because I see a wider battlefield; one in which chicanes and pitfalls were laid many decades ago.
For those who believe that Law is the measure of mankind's wisdom and justice, the elite sowed constitutions and bills of rights. That the word DEMOCRACY was excised from every draft constitution has yet to be noticed.
Then came the City of London's pawn, Mohandas Gandhi, who was cultivated and nurtured as the champion of non-violent protest, demanding from the might of the British Empire they they permit India to gain independence. As so many Indians and Africans shouted loudly but futilely, that Gandhi was a racist and elitist, and that the British Raj had already decided to allow independence and new controls had already been put in place, the entire stage show was guided through the streets of London and the dusty paths of India, with Gandhi performing brilliantly.
This was a stage set for a future confrontation, many times postponed until, eventially, 2020. But it was not the only one. Martin Luthor king also was set up to reinforce the "Non-violent peaceful protest" message . Although even some protagonists were skeptical, the entire world ignored CIA, FBI, National Guard, and special police emascultation of the white supremicist's resistance and violence, and accepted that black rights was achieved by "non-violent peaceful protest".
Naturally, as was Gandhi, King was assassinated, to round off the entire aura of martyredom.
It worked.
Today, Globalists can scarcely believe their own eyes when they see a gigantic segment of mankind being herded into the jab chambers and stoically refusing to attack their murderers.
Me too.
I do not wish to challenge your assertions here about Gandhi and King being pawns. I get the gist and it may well be the truth.
But I'll say that the current belief that passive resistance is the One True Way probably owes as much to being indoctrinated to comply to institutional authority from kindergarten through high school, and also, the belief (naive imo) that voting is a genuine way to bring about governance that truly advances the commonwealth.... let me replace the 'wealth' in that word with 'well-being'.
"Democracy is chaos with ballot urns." Thomas Carlyle
Astute of you, Bosco, but you have nudged me down an even more bumpy road... ballot urns have nothing to do with democracy. As any of the tens of thousands of participants in the American 1870s-80s Populist Movement could have told us, Lincoln had it right with his lyrical definition "Government of the people, by the people and for the people".
This means exactly what it says... the people formulate policy through local, regional and national consensus, which is then implemented by the Public Service. The vast construct inserted so forceably into public discourse to prevent consensus government by the people, is the absurdity of candidates, representatives, elections, majorities, voting, debate, and parliaments or congresses.
These are designd to obstruct the "will of the people", not lubricate that.
There is a reason that every celebrity is recorded as cherishing "Our Precious Democracy" whether or not he actually uttered these words. And in case zealots poke me in the ribs and quote history, at almost 80 years, I can say that my very active experience on this planet provided me with crystal-clear memories that are at 99% varience to the 'histories' taught to tertiary students and graduates today. "History" now is what we called "revisionism" 60 years ago.
I get that. The prob, as ever, is trust and verification. Also, the process of forming those layers of consensuses (I wanna say consensii; can I, please?) is itself tricky. Anything larger than the monkeysphere -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number -- reduces verified trust, and from there, it rolls downhill fast.
I do not believe the popular notion that homo sapiens can govern itself harmoniously in groups larger than that of the standard Neolithic tribe.
All these ideals tend to run short when asked that question: Who will bell the cat? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belling_the_Cat
One of my fave old jokes has something to say about this albeit from a deliberately absurd perspective:
this elephant would get sloshed on Saturday nights and on its way home deliberately stagger through the termite mounts and smash them down.
The termites decided to fight back. Strength in numbers and all that.
Next Sat night, elephant comes stomping through and finds itself ambushed by ten godzillion termites jumping on it from the surrounding trees.
Briefly, it is shook by the collective mass of termites, but gets back to its knees and shakes them off like a dog after a bath.
One termite is left clinging to the elephant's dewlap. It's fellow termites, seeing this loner bravely and tenaciously continuing the fight, holler, "Choke him!"
Wolf pack size can range from 2 to 36 wolves, with the average pack size consisting of 6 wolves. Lion prides range from two to 40 lions. Elephants live in herds of 20 to 70 individuals.
Humans think they can govern themselves sanely, safely, and harmoniously in groups of 10K to pushing 8 billion. We can't. Whatever ideal of governing system one applies will fail. I agree with conservatives like Curtis Yarvin -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin -- that the only form of governance that can even remotely work is monarchy. I agree simply because it emulates basic pack behavior: one uber alpha male to bind them together.
Of course they tend to last only for 1-3 successions, and for me to promote monarchy is really more a perverse sentimental affectation on my part, because really, I promote no form of governance over another. Governments morph and change via enormous, powerful, and very rapid Darwinian social pressures and generally run all over the road and cause massive collisions on a reliably regular basis.
We still have neolithic minds/hearts but now with ICBM nukes, gene sequencers, and handroid hypnotic celldrones. I see cellphones taking their human pets for walks every day. I think cellphones are aliens from another star system or dimension who've chosen to dominate our lives without us knowing it.
We've all seen this one, right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNt4NIQ7FTA
Bosco... I think I can counter those arguments. If you email me tonyryan43@gmail.com I can send you a PDF version of a novel I wrote that is still with the publishers and thus is free. It is the outcome of 56 years research.
Oh, it's not something I wish to debate, per se. I was just clarifying my position. Now that I'm about recovered from my last surgery, I have a novel or 3 I need to finish and throw at some publishers to see if anyone bites. so I'll have to pass for now, oz. The eyes are old and so am I. But if there is a modest section of chapters that make your primary point, I would be willing to read that much, so I'll ping you.
Sounds good to me. The chapter where the old ceremony men tell me about their 24,000 year old decision-making protocols will give you food for thought. Good luck with your own books.
I beg to differ! Bill Gates is NOT a freak! Your government is! Everything was done, has been done and being done to us ALL BY GOVERNMENTS!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus or anyone else CANNOT DO A THING to you and me without our own governments!
That's WHY ALL GOVERNMENTS join the so-called "global pandemic treaty".
PS
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and their ilk did not murder millions people in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not order their thugs (a.k.a cops and soldiers) beat people up, shoot people sown for not wearing farcical diapers!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not destroy people livelihoods for NOT TAKING the clot-shot!
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus did not murder Russians, Ukrainians in the current "war of distraction" in Ukraine.
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, or Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have not done a thing to Russians with the clot-shot, it's Russian Government! Stupid!
This doctor is naïve if not a useful idiot!
Fighting the NWO without fighting your own government is futile and plain stupidity!
How does any of that establish that Gates is NOT a freak?
Have you ever seen the guy speak (squawk)?
Freak.
His mannerisms betray his psychosis.
i think hes being very polite in his description of Gates
i'd just come right out and say hes a total nutcase and needs his head removing
" Under these controls, they will live worse than slaves." Not just our children, but we ourselves. This is happening VERY fast, new steps being implemented daily. These are the digital Enclosures, or rather the digital chapter of The Enclosures, which started in late medieval England, and have gone on since then. They won't stop till capital controls every micron of every human being and every entity in the natural world. We are being herded into their Blockchain global mind hive. Thanks so much for this, Riley, the good doctor nails it here.
"Everyone is so happy and delighted that they collect cryptocurrencies, that they have cards, that they easily pay with mobile phones. These are all links of the same chain. This is one big concentration camp. You didn't get an injection? Nothing works for you and it won’t work. You can't leave the house. If someone thinks that this is nonsense, then please ask: what is happening now in China?"
I thought Billy goat Gatekeeper was bad news bares in like 1991
About Bill Gates.
People who are not of the masses and mobs can exhibit eccentricities. The manner of speaking, thinking, acting and feeling are different from the imitative masses.
This incites the fury of masses and mobs, when someone strays from the beaten path of what is commonly accepted, there must be something wrong with him. So in the comment section on this blog, which is supposed to be about freedom..., we have mere slander and gossip of people who apply a psychological label (psychopath) and other insulting terms, from freak to 'Anti-Christ', including people who apparently set themselves up as psychologists. It happens on many blogs which are supposed to be about freedom.
Gates' eccentricities have nothing to do with his position of extreme power and his views, which should be the point of debate, to mention his eccentricities in public media means to incite envy, intolerance and prejudice, which stinks. It is agitation against a person on the basis of his most personal traits. Thé foremost trespassing against the freedom of the individual.
I am sure that Edward Slavsquat didn't aim at it though, but inciting judgemental hatred on the basis of personal traits is the result. So perhaps he should think twice next time, imagine himself or someone he loves to be the subject of slander might help. Not everything what they say in Russia is worth to translate. The doctor is not asked to give an analysis of individual traits and the personal neurology of Gates, such an analysis should remain between doctor and client, and if he can't help to practice such analysis on what is not his client, he should keep it indoors.
The vintage Soviet nyet photo from alcohol to Sputnik V is an awesome caption. I am determine to encourage and inspire college students to think for themselves about the dangers of this WHO plandemic/scamdemic treaty as well as the danger from ALL injections. The original transcript in Russian with Doctor Denis Ivanov would be appreciated and I would like your permission to hand out as flyers with your original conversation transcript to college students in Minsk. Thank you for your defense of our freedom!
Have this guy do Elon Musk next. Great stuff!
meanwhile in russia https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2022/05/19/putins-mistake/
He is 100% correct. I would go further and say that Gates is a psychopath.
The insanity stays frequently within families:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41271-022-00347-9.pdf
Thanks for the translation. It's good to know Bill Gates is universally hated. I wouldn't have come across this doctor were it not for your article.
right now I see no urge here in my country of a 4th dose, or yearly mRNA vaccinations. It feels like the third ("booster") jab was the last one. The vaxx pass is not asked anymore except for very few places.
Yet as monkeypox and the turbo avian flu spread in foreign lands, the writing is clearly on the wall for what is coming