The 90's were a very busy decade for political hucksters and money-hungry financiers as well as multinational corporations, as during the 1990's while the Chicago Boys/Wall Street were dismantling Russia's assets the Clinton/Riady family along with the Israelis were sending significant military technology to China.
In Western culture and interestingly enough in Confucianism there's an emotional desire to contruct a world in terms of black-and-white dualism symbolizing a moral dichotomy separating good and evil. Sadly, in reality the color contrast is not so stark as there's many nuanced shades within the "moral spectrum."
In any event, I think the Global Empire's agenda was set decades ago and the current series of manufactured crises are helping to accelerate its fruition.
It might be very possible, the West deliberately through Russia into the arms of China in order to hasten the worldwide economic restructuring currently underway which Russia, China, and the US are all on board with and includes an invasive digitalization of the world's population via personal health records and bank accounts. In fact, If we look at the West it is becoming more unabashedly authoritarian.
Incidentally, Lary Fink CEO of BlackRock, has said on more than one occasion that he admires China's political system as liberal democracies tend to be too messy. I wouldn't be surprised if all the techno/fascists and bankster/gangsters hold the same view as Fink. So if you really want to know what the Fourth Industrial Revolution looks like take a peep at Beijing.
Interesting ideas. Yet a puzzle for me. If Russia, China and the US are hand in hand with a worldwide economic restructuring, why not simply agreeing on it and carry it out in the open? They sure do not give a damn for their respective peoples' opinions, like they did with the scandemic. Why staging everything? The Maidan coup, the Minsk agreements, Russia's "invasion", the sanctions on Russia, escalating tensions US/China on Taiwan's behalf, hundreds of thousands war casualties, an arrest warrant for Putin (would he wilfully do that to himself?)... everything must be staged! Not that the globalists care much for people, but even the meannest person has a little conscience, and it could have been as simple as shaking hands on the economic restructuring and just do it by mutual agreement. Besides, if the above three countries are all on board with that project, it would then not be appropriate to say that "the West deliberatly threw Russia into the arms of China", but rather "Russia pretended" to have been trown etc., woulld it? And if Russia was indeed thrown into China's arms against its wills or plans, then Russia is not complicit in the plot, is it?
I'm not saying your hunch is wrong, but I find difficult to understand how such a theatrical and convoluted play may have been scripted in such detail, most of all when there was no need for it, which later consideration is what mostly makes me feel it does not add up. Covid has proved most of the world's population is conformist enough to swallow whatever piece of garbage it is fed. The whole thing baffles me.
Having the same issues. But maybe we, the plebs, have more power than we think we have. Military and Police people have families too. You need all this propaganda to keep the majority in line. At least to give all them cowards a reason not to act.
See what happened to all communist regimes. Even if people do not revolve, they won't play along either. They may find loopholes. So keeping us plebs occupied with nonsense, keep us divided through "elections" and useless wars is still a necessity it seems. And it is for sure much cheaper than pure violence and suppression. Let's not forget: The best slave is the slave who doesn't know he's a slave. Ensure the rats keep running in their little rat race and change the system step by step in the background is considered safe and effective it seems ;-)
Maybe you're right. I'm very confused. Too many factors are in play for my limited brain and knowledge. And yet, the scamdemic was the most eye-opening event in my entire life: we've all witnessed how easy it is to brainwash people to comply with the unitary mindset, without needing to kill anyone (leaving aside the millions dead as a consequence of the injected medications). 99,9% of the world's governments synchronously agreed on lockdowns and restrictions because the World Rulers wanted it so. I do not see why they cannot do the same with economic restructuring. But what the hell do I know... :-(
Same for me with the plandemic. And as Germans, we were educated about the exact same thing about Third Reich over and over again. And now it happened before my very eyes. Everyone obeyed blindly and I felt people would have killed me because of opposition if Government would just have allowed it. I think, people deserve their slavery and holocaust. If they just wouldn't drag me with them into their dirty grub.
That is exactly what I recently wrote to a Russian friend of mine, who had told me she had not the smallest intention of moving a finger on behalf of this stupefied society, which deserves what it gets. I replied almost with your very same words: I wouldn't do anything, too, if only I weren't doomed to live in this society and to descend to hell with it!
By the way, I for one also felt that I would have got killed by the fury of the rabble if Government had allowed it. :-)
And how "it is exactly", oh troll of trolls? What is it that "perfectly explains the situation", oh ubiquitous goblin of the blogosphere? What is the "old plan" and how it is exactly laid out, oh erudite oracle? Where is it "open and freely available", oh learned soothsayer? What are those infallible accurate sources of yours, oh master of the keyboard?
Instead of preaching around with your alleged wisdom and flooding the blogs with your inexhaustible torrent of cryptic -and almost unintelligible- words, what about coming up with some facts, some reliable information, some good translations, some concrete, precise and irrefutable explanation of all that happens? Ever thought of devoting your unquenchable energies in enlightening us the initiates, the ignoramuses, rather than endlessly pontificating and boasting of an arcane knowledge that I do not see materialised in anything useful?
Speak, oh thou augur, fountain of wisdom! Share your hidden secrets with us, thou lord of palmistry!
"But even the meannest person has a little conscience, and it could have been as simple as shaking hands on the economic restructuring and just do it by mutual agreement..."
The international bankster/gangsters cannot directly implement their plans as there's numerous insidious machinations which need to be implemented prior to fully establishing a total economic restructuring. Even with the scamdemic a ton of intense synchronized propaganda was deployed to terrorize populations in order to gain compliance.
That's why these predators always use benevolent sounding terms to fool the trusting and naive.
In the case of geogstrategic politics, the ghouls find it useful to coral folks into a variety of "manageable ideological camps." So they create the "illusion" of acrimony between the worldwide gangster cartel, however, these hoodlums always are in agreement on exploiting populations and are allowed to do as they wish as long it doesn't oppose Global Empire. So Russia, China, and the US are hassling over plunder and strategy, but all three are determined to create a technocracy digitalizing the entire population utilizing a central bank digital currency and biosecurity surveillance.
But, Charlotte, the way I see it, the ton of intense syhchronized propaganda was extremely easy and cheap for them to deploy. In the term of a couple of weeks, the entire world was convinced they faced death if not wearing a mask. Only a few months later the world complied with being incarcerated in their own homes for months in a row and even leaned out of their windows at 8 pm sharp to synchronously applaud the jailers. What can be worse than prison? Imagine a similar media campaign to tell the world's population that Russia, China and the US have agreed on worldwide economic restructuration and digital IDs for the sake of our safety, health and welfare. Do you think the masses would seriously oppose?
The British and French would not be toppled so easily, I think. But we didn't get any info about the French during the first try, so this is just guessing.
Indeed they are. That's a valid point I've thought of sometimes. A few weeks ago Dima (of the Military Summary channel) expressed his opinion that this no-war would not end before there take place some fighter jets battles, so both armies can test their own armament in real-life scenarios. Very cynical but perhaps correct prediction. Maybe this is all about military industrial complexes testing their weaponry and making money.
It is obviously the case that it is a testing ground like all wars but there is another aspect that has emerged about weapons. It seems that a lot of weapons sent to Zelenski's regime, as CBS (from memory) documented for instance never reach the front and are sold on the black market. Some African leader said that some have already flown on the continent to fuel the Russian/ 5 eyes wars there. Many European police officers in many places have given warnings.
A f... lot of weapons going only God knows where and probably to non-state actors which could be mafias of course but also Stay Behind like groups in the EU...
Looks like an interesting article, albeit damned long. I'm bookmarking it for future reading. Which are your comments? What's your handle in that thread?
like you...I had previously commented that if the US NATO Russia and China are all part of the great reset agenda why bother with the "war" in Ukraine and the scamdemic with its clot shots...they have control of the military and the ability to make all the draconian laws they want to...why the need for all this three dimensional chess If they are in fact all in on the same new world order/ great reset agenda? personally I find it hard to believe the U.S. and their evil twin Israel would want to give up their role as the worlds "super power"
Totally agree. That's what keeps baffling me. They have the world's population in their fist. Can do whatever they want with us. Why bother playing this theatre, or any other?
The explanation Bugey Libre suggests--that the war is very lucrative--is plausible, and yet, I'd say they don't really need any wars to multiply their profit. The world is theirs!
UNLESS..! Unless we are overdoing our red-pilling. Perhaps, after all, those three countries are not so much in collusion. Perhaps WEF & Co. do not really control China. Perhaps the CCP has its own agenda that only partly overlaps the WEF's. I've been to China a few times and, quite frankly, it did not strike me as the kind of society walking towards feminism, degenerate LBTQism, indiscriminate immigration or environmentalism; although of course is one of the most citizen-controlling countries I've ever visited.
you can't have a mass world police society, even with what they plan as their control mechanism (digital ID, bioinformation access, central bank digital currency knowing everything you spend on and ability to control what and when you spend through negative interest rates). what they want is internalization of the dictats so that they don't have to go around cracking heads all of the time, because cracking heads is inefficient.
they need us to submit. how better than that they have "heroes" face off and then suffer defeat? demoralize the populace, and show that "there is no alternative" even if we can still dream of one (remember 1984? "the proles will save us!").
as for the "lucrativeness" of the MIC contracts, that's just a sideshow. what they really desire is free disposal of old mode war materiel. very expensive to take that crap and try to de-arm it following any kind of environmental regs. this is quite similar to the 9.11 plot to destroy a building full of asbestos rather than remediate, because remediation would bankrupt any owner except the Big-gov, and obviously the gov didn't want to do it (endless years arguing over how to do it, permitting, environmental studies, contractors grifting, and "taxpayers" yelling about waste) being a side show to the main attraction which was to bring war to the M.East and full spectrum spying on the domestic populace (and do away with habeas corpus) to keep us "safe".
their plans usually always are set up to attain multiple goals at once. the new warfare will not be carried on at all like the last century's warfare was (mechanized, drones, sensors, etc instead of big machines run by faulty humans), and you need a way to get rid of that crap and justify buying new crap. and that crap is intended to be used against US when we inevitably don't want to go alone with their full control and rapine.
''Incidentally, Lary Fink CEO of BlackRock, has said on more than one occasion that he admires China's political system as liberal democracies tend to be too messy.''
Liberal Democracy is one of the most brutal regimes on the planet... The Party in 1984 could do with a rebranding. The Liberal Democracy
Neoliberal economics by definition requires austerity and rentier capitalism (the FIRE sector) primacy. Even without a military or network of spy agencies, NGOs and cutouts, neoliberal economics wreaks havoc on countries. Look at what Thatcherism and Reaganism did to the UK and US respectively. No military imperialist invasions needed; just a population of suckers.
I mentioned that neoliberalism is a predatory form of capitalism. Something which does wreak havoc everywhere since it's the kind of business model which allows the worst creatures to run rampant and uncontrolled while being protected by the security state. That being said, small market capitalism "eliminating" monopolistic monsters and techno/fascists would be much more desirable. However, I personally have no wish to jump from the fying pan into the technocratic transhumanist neofeudal fire. Btw, China has more billionaires than other country and many are in the Communist Party. Evidently, decades of Western social engineering projects have been very profitable for the socialists with biosecurity surveillance characteristics.
"It might be very possible, the West deliberately through Russia into the arms of China in order to hasten the worldwide economic restructuring currently underway ..."
Indeed, because why else would Jim O'Neill, former Goldman Sachs hotshot and current chairman of the Chatham House promote BRICS and dedollarization?
"Jim O’Neill, the former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. chief economist who coined the acronym BRIC, said the bloc of nations that later adopted the name should expand and work to counter the dollar’s dominance.
In a paper published in the Global Policy journal on March 26, O’Neill called on the group to apply strict criteria to ensure the addition of any new members to its ranks helps further its aims and urged it to focus on climate finance, improving healthcare and boosting trade.
“The US dollar plays a far too dominant role in global finance,” he wrote. “Whenever the Federal Reserve Board has embarked on periods of monetary tightening, or the opposite, loosening, the consequences on the value of the dollar and the knock-on effects have been dramatic.”
Brazil, Russia, India and China established BRIC in 2009 and the bloc became BRICS a year later when South Africa was admitted. If it expands to include other “emerging nations with persistent surpluses,” a globally fairer, multi-currency global system could emerge, O’Neill said."
May 21, 2023·edited May 23, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat
You definitely deserve a subscription, Riley!
And Mrs. Bechet-Golovko writes IMMIGRANTS! (Instead of "migrants".) She has earned my everlasting admiration. Only a person really aware (and beware!) of the globalists' manipulative vocabulary and semantics is capable of realizing the deceitful and delusionary meanings their words portray.
Plus, if that weren't enough, I think she has nailed the four pillars of globalism: sustainability and climate change, digital cult, immigration and gender relativism.
This sentence, though, I am unable to decipher: "[...] which, once you leave the front, is incompatible with Moscow’s gentle hesitation and desire for normalization, regardless of the human cost." I would appreciate any clarification. To what refers the word "which": to inhibition, to strengthening patriotism or to population? What is "Moscow's gentle hesitation"? What does "normalization" mean here? What "human cost" does she refer to?
The problem with war and patriotism nowadays is, in my opinion, that life has become too easy for most of the world's population, except in some African and Middle East countries. We have not lived in war times for the last eight decades, which means most of the people today alive have never experienced a war, and at the same time have lived a relatively easy life. On the other hand, religious and patriotic beliefs, which have historically been the main forces pushing people to make war (besides, of course, hunger and physical suffering) are (probably because of science and the widespread global world idea) in clear decline. Give someone food, a roof, health care, some little money and a smartphone, and he'll be the most reluctant person to take a gun and die for his nation, or for anything except perhaps his family. Why should he? Me being the first one to run away from any armed conflict I might possibly be pushed to. So, I understand the difficulty of talking Russians into willingly going to war, even for the noblest and most patriotic cause.
I see many people talking about the "1917 scenario", but I am convinced such a thing is impossible. Present-day societies do not meet the necessary requirements. We live, thanks God, too comfortably for risking our lives. The ubiquitous talks about heroic Russia having never been defeated are, in my opinion, puerile and misguided. No empire was ever defeated, until it was, either in war or by time itself. Predicting what Russians will do now on the basis of what _those_ Russians of yore did long time ago is like predicting the next result of the dice based on the previous throws. That Russia of 1917, and even that of 1941, has little to do with the one of today, like those Romans of Christ's times or those Spaniards of XVth century have nothing in common with the Italians of Spaniards of today.
Lastly, I can personally confirm Karine's opinion about the Western "alt-media". I for one turned my eyes to Russia not only for my lifelong sympathy towards that country (which I still have), but "against" my own country --as she says--, for I feel I do not belong to it any more and I needed something to believe in. Thus, for many months I swallowed the narrative of those media, which is more anti-USA or anti-imperialism than it is pro-Russia. And, yet, it did not fully convince me, for I am very critical and there were some contradictions I could not sort out (like for instance Russia's full compliance with the scamdemic). And so of late I have turned to more red-pilled sources like your blog or Rolo's, where I am finding ideas and information a lot more consistent with reality. And I am glad and grateful, despite having needed to experience the bitterness of lost dreams.
Thank you for the support (and very thoughtful comment), Freelander!
As to your question: Karine is saying that Moscow is pursuing a policy of pretending that the war is not a war ("normalization"), even though it may cost more human lives in the end. And she points out that this is, of course, incompatible with patriotic sentiments in the country.
Yes, here I got a new and better dream: to be free of your sour replies to my comments. Be true to your word about me not worrying and help fulfill my dream.
Insult is the last resource of dimwits. It was written you'd end up trying to offend. But if you--as it looks--are unable to curb your Freelander addiction, I sure prefer your childish insults over your incoherent gibberish. At least they are hilarious.
At this point noosfera, you should consider changing the way you interact with people online, shouldn't you? Your comments sometimes bring insightful Data... Just saying.
Yeah yeah yeah daddy of course I won't be mean in your comments section. BUT, since I was part of that griftependent alt media brainrot dummypants crew, I'm entitled to bag on myself. That person who told you you're NPR, or CNN, or whatever evil WEEEEEEEEEEEEEST entity you work for, I'm very familiar. After funnelling hard earned money into her coffers (long before she worked for Russia today and became religiously affiliated with our father who art in the Kremlin, Vlady "patron saint of the superhuman anti-west" daddy) to go get stories all over the global south, I decided to do some shite posting just like Iain cuz I was tired of the stenography of Russian state media. Her army of brainless simps with a plethora of "BUT THE WEEEEEEEEEEEEEST" cliches dogpiled on me on Twitter, and dm'd hate mail.
Bottom line my beautiful guy, these people are brainless. You shouldn't take other people's absolute and total stupidity as your failing, just leave it at (either) they're either stupid from birth or paid to be stupid (both in some cases). Keep doin you brosef. You're doing more than the entirety of griftependent media with your one blog.
As you probably know, I'm pretty hands-off with comments -- although on my last post, I tried to encourage people to be gentle, as a gesture of good-will, etc. etc.
Your comment is much appreciated though. Mostly because it was entertaining, but also because you described me as "beautiful". In my 35 years on Earth, no one has ever used that word to describe me, so I encourage you to comment more.
Great interview of a very bright mind, translated by a no less bright mind done by another fortunately often funny (and aspiring cornerstone) bright mind Riley Waggaman!
As an aside, I think I might have a plan to make any "artifice of intelligence" permanently "burn out". Let's ask any chat gpt (in French tha acronym sounds like "i farted") to translate Modeste's daily article in Mongolian, Chinese or Korean, or Tongan.... simultaneously of course;
Thanks, Riley. This is your best piece I've read, IMHO. You wouldn't find this anywhere else:
"China is one of the central countries of globalization, and ideologically its vision of man and society are extremely dangerous for Russia, especially since both nations are followers of the digital cult."
I must confess, that is one of the quiotes in this interview I less understand. Why China's vison of man and society are so dangerous for Russia ESPECIALLY since both worship the digital cult?
Maybe because China has most of the rare earth and their 'refining' and already has advance in industrial producing of the tech tools necessary for the delirium of the digital cult crowd, thus programing them at their will and ultimately control the whole thing...
Interesting how the prediction Wagner's eagerness to retreat pre-faced a Ukrainian offensive, turned out to be the case.
Your neo-liberals may not have (yet) suffered from the Russian-AstraZeneca clotshot, but the London neo-liberals have already started to tumble, with Saddo Khan suffering a heart attack:
I chalk it up to all the Londoners "upgrading" all of his ULEZ cameras with the 'wireless' (and offline) 'functionality', trigger him to have a stress attack.
Neo-liberals of course won't disappear or end up mysteriously with their heads on a pike ('their heads on a pike or our bodies in a grave', as the saying goes), just short of them being dumb enough to fall into their own spike traps, and whilst some are exceedingly dumb, I think the majority need the public's help finding the nearest Kanada-style "MAID" service to receive Aktion-T4 approved Turdeau poison cocktail special.
Did you read the report how the Kanada Aktion T4 wants to murder all the poor people?
Apparently one third of Kanadians are okay with killing the poor, specifically, the homeless:
"They banned my blog" - Sad, really sad, it had great content. That was really quick :( You can still try to run a wordpress site. Yes, hahaha, "biocosmism", I came upon this shit yesterday on this account. https://twitter.com/SRQSmartyPints/status/1650369035614269441
I too eat well. For NOW! One of these days, they'll require you to have a digital pass to get food, because the only legal form of exchange will be CBDCs.. I'm not for any form of exchange, but that's something that only society in large numbers can change, meaning a social insurgency. Till then, the availability of good food will be contingent upon being able to buy it (can't grow much here in the city), and sooner or later you will be coerced or you won't eat.
Not seldom I come to think, once they impose on us CBDCs as the only form of legal exchange, eventually some populations (or many) may spontaneously come up with some popularly accepted currency, like silver or gold coins for instance. Not saying it will happen, but it's a possibility.
Sure. But I hope we both agree in that doing without exchange is impossible nowadays. Imagine a pensioneer with no skills, producing nothing, without even a garden to grow tomatoes. How'd he do without exchange?
Most of our history wasn't even barter, just sharing, tribes were like families. Between tribes, barter of incidental surpluses, with arrangements to prevent excessive accumulations, such as Potlatch.
The problem I see is that very few people hold some gold and silver... maybe tobacco could become a new currency, indeed tobacco has always been used in carceral condition as currency after all... Let's hope creativity will arise.
Silver can be bought with CBDCs (unless they program the DCs so we can't do it), or before "normal" money stops working. Silver is cheap. The lowest denominations are less than 10 €, which is suitable for small commerce. A few years ago a friend of mine, a bit eccentric, foreseeing all this authoritarianism bought a ton of silver coins, just in case. At that time I thought him to be a fool. Now I don't. :)
Thank you for this. It inches forward the understanding of the politically naive such as myself. I'll tell you what would be a greater 'incher forward' for such as I and it would be to spell out clearly to us what would be the desired reforms that are NOT 'neoliberal' or 'globalist'.
That's a good question. I love the criticism made in Riley's and some other's blogs, but I miss proposed solutions. I've already asked several times in different "red-pilled" blogs who is, according to their authors' or commenters' opinions, the better leader to replace Putin, but so far I have not got the shade of an answer.
Yet another evasive. Nonexistent persons cannot hold office. So, in order to answer that question, we must first know _who_ might that better one be. Who is your candidate?
Excuse my ignorance but I sometimes get the impression that everything in the western world belongs to 'the tribe'. They seem to appear everywhere or are claimed to be there. When they are not there the commentators generally claim their grandparents or such were there or at the very least they 'have connections'.
That's a clear impression I'm given by the readings I've had.
But I get another impression, too: 'the tribe' seems to be present on both sides of whatever conflict or political manoeuvring we are looking at.
In truth that seems to be the case. That 'the tribe' is neither on this side nor that but is so ubiquitous, truly, that in the end it is on all sides.
Whereas the third clear impression I get is that I'm being told incessantly about the 'presence' of 'the tribe' here and there in order to have me believe they're an organised baleful menace and the reason behind all our (western) world's ills.
you are being told incessantly about the presence of the tribe? bullshit...what you are being told incessantly is that they are the eternal victims of anti semitism and that they dont control the media and thus the narrative...you trollin here bro?...https://www.unz.com/ejones/why-its-easier-to-talk-to-a-robot-than-to-a-jew/
I am not told incessantly about their victimisation.
Your link leads to something I haven't completely read or studied as yet. I may some time in the future and I may not. I do not look forward to it for what I did read here and there amongst it seemed to indicate it to be mostly specious 'argumentation' which is always very dreary and even annoying to read. Especially as one usually does it in order to help correct the thinking of some person with a bee in their bonnet fueled by a bunch of misapprehensions.
One gets tired of trying to make people 'see the light'.
I noted, for instance, this:
"When Harari tells us “We’ve just encountered an alien intelligence, not in outer space but here on earth,”[6] the conclusion becomes inescapable. He is talking about himself and the group which gives him his identity, namely, the Jews. "
No. That's presumptive and contrary to my implication. I implied, I think, when I pointed to presence on both sides, that their efforts were supportive of their respective sides. That they were effectively at war with themselves in this.
Furthermore 'presiding over' is your introduction. That's what they call a straw man isn't it? When you introduce something that wasn't there in the first place and then knock it down? With the twist that this time you didn't knock it down but rather use it as the main peg of your argument. Just what device that is I don't know, I'm not logician enough nor clever enough. But I do know it is a perversion of the truth.
In fact they are long way from 'presiding over' the people I point to. For I point to the presence regardless of position and some are in relatively high places and some are poverty stricken. As a child in the UK during WWII there were such people in high places in the Govt & military of the UK, I believe, just as there were in Germany (despite the pogroms) and there were such living down our street in the humblest circumstances.
The bombs that rained down on us rained down on them.
This is stretching this out to boredom length but I'm new out of bed this morning and all fired up with the first coffee and feeling loquacious:
when it comes to the 'tribe winning' it seems to me they need do nothing after the style of the things often ascribed to them. they do not need to manipulate the world so that this side wins or that side wins. They need only stand aloof. Their religion says that they must quietly suffer and obey and then eventually they get to heaven and fulfill their contract with god.
Their aim, I'm saying, is religious, sectarian, not really worldly at all.
It is ironic that they so often 'rise' to positions of wealth, positions of 'intellect', shall we say, positions of power when these are not their fundamental objectives. But actually predictable. If you keep your head down and try to live a frugal, good and sensible life in concert with your fellows, each helping the other, these kind of 'successes' will surely come and have done throughout the ages to all kinds of such groups.
I've run out of steam. Need more coffee. Sorry if I bored you.... :)
Good morning or good evening in the numeric no man's land Arthur! Right now it is early in the morning and I am having a 'bullet proof coffee' that unfortunately we can't share.
Your post is interesting and there are many truths in it. Have you ever hear about antinomian Judaïsme? Jewish religion is very complicated... Try for a start with Shabbateism and frankism.
I had not heard, no. Perhaps some literature somewhere ( not too tediously scholarly but dumbed down for such as I )? I will not devote a lot of time and energy into trying to understand in detail Jewish religion, I can say that up front, I just don't have sufficient interest, sufficient energy, or given my scatterbrained and butterfly-like wanderings over all the fields of ... what? 'human endeavour' or something? ... 'all the interesting things in the world' ? I won't even have the time....
Finally someone gives a correct view on the globalist nature of "multi-polarity", Russia needs a new system of social governance, just like any other state. Excellent questions and answers in this interview.
But then why multipolarity suits globalism better than unipolarity? This is one of the questions I have not yet been able to fully understand. The scamdemic was, so to say, "unipolar" and people did not really complain about it.
It was not that unipolar sir, some countries didn't go along with the scam, some of these have seen their leaders died or experience coup d'état attempt like in Madagascar and Sweden demonstrated a very different approach...
Sweden is indeed a societal engineering lab and has been so for a long time, maybe even before the sicko Palme. Few people, a large wealth appearing after WWII, a very obedient mindset (think lagom) and a socialist model. A good place for human experimentation. I used to have a relationship with a svenska kvina from a very educated family for 5 years and so spent some times there, even working.
As far as I know, Madagascar and Tanzania (in a lesser degree Sweden too) were the only countries not going with the scam, but they ended up yielding to it. Anyways, I was thinking about the citizenry when I wrote my above comment.
Ok, so there is a big difference between Asian and other human stocks for instance. All humans can be hacked in Harari's meaning but you can't trap everybody with the same "stuff". A guy from let's say Sichuan, has a very different cultural and background than an Italian or a Bambara and it would be very improbable to rule all "ways" of people in the same bag peacefully...
So we should believe in "as no country can really be self-sufficient." Sounds a bit globalist central-bankey to me. Russia couldnt be self suficient? Wow.
Interesting choice for the interview about globalists.
Good question. I believe that statement of Karine's to be essentially wrong. If there is a country in the world that can be self-sufficient, that's the RF (perhaps the US too). There are only two basic types of resources: material and intellectual/technological. The latter can always be developed, and the former are abundant in the RF. Thus, theoretically the RF could become almost totally self-sufficient. However, I am not sure this is realistically possible in the short or mid term, even supposing Moscow wanted to achieve that, which it obviously does not.
no country can be self sufficient at this level of technology/resource usage.
if you want to go back to earlier forms of simpler tech, then yes---localities could be roughly "self sufficient" again. but how far back does anyone want to go?
and then you hit the problem that the USSR supposedly (at least according to western accounts, even granting that USSR was not total autarky) hit---the limits of that mean that you are or appear "behind" everyone else and your people, induced by media and tales of how great the grass is over there, start getting restless.
so no, if we don't want to return to 16th century living standards(which was already semi-global trading, hence all of those explorers looking for alternate trade routes), then we have to press on with intercooperation. the problem is again, how inter and is it cooperation?
In the context of this thread, "self-sufficiency" must be understood in relative terms. If a country's population want to buy Chinese porcelain, iroko furniture or ivory figurines, obviously they need to import those products. But for modern-day living standards, leaving aside rare stuff, all a country needs is basic natural resources (hydrocarbons, uranium, rare earths, etc.) and technology. The former, by definition, cannot be created out of thin air: if you do not have them, you need to buy them. There's no escape to that. But technology can be developed. Theoretically, nothing but technology would prevent Russia from manufacturing everything its society might want so as to not feel they lag behind the rest of the world. That's what I call "self-sufficiency". Sure, there would be still some very small percentage (1%?, 3%?) of goods or raw materials it would neccesarily have to import, but in practical terms I think it'd be acceptable to talk about autarky in that case. No need to resort to the 16th century strawman. :)
The 90's were a very busy decade for political hucksters and money-hungry financiers as well as multinational corporations, as during the 1990's while the Chicago Boys/Wall Street were dismantling Russia's assets the Clinton/Riady family along with the Israelis were sending significant military technology to China.
In Western culture and interestingly enough in Confucianism there's an emotional desire to contruct a world in terms of black-and-white dualism symbolizing a moral dichotomy separating good and evil. Sadly, in reality the color contrast is not so stark as there's many nuanced shades within the "moral spectrum."
In any event, I think the Global Empire's agenda was set decades ago and the current series of manufactured crises are helping to accelerate its fruition.
It might be very possible, the West deliberately through Russia into the arms of China in order to hasten the worldwide economic restructuring currently underway which Russia, China, and the US are all on board with and includes an invasive digitalization of the world's population via personal health records and bank accounts. In fact, If we look at the West it is becoming more unabashedly authoritarian.
Incidentally, Lary Fink CEO of BlackRock, has said on more than one occasion that he admires China's political system as liberal democracies tend to be too messy. I wouldn't be surprised if all the techno/fascists and bankster/gangsters hold the same view as Fink. So if you really want to know what the Fourth Industrial Revolution looks like take a peep at Beijing.
Interesting ideas. Yet a puzzle for me. If Russia, China and the US are hand in hand with a worldwide economic restructuring, why not simply agreeing on it and carry it out in the open? They sure do not give a damn for their respective peoples' opinions, like they did with the scandemic. Why staging everything? The Maidan coup, the Minsk agreements, Russia's "invasion", the sanctions on Russia, escalating tensions US/China on Taiwan's behalf, hundreds of thousands war casualties, an arrest warrant for Putin (would he wilfully do that to himself?)... everything must be staged! Not that the globalists care much for people, but even the meannest person has a little conscience, and it could have been as simple as shaking hands on the economic restructuring and just do it by mutual agreement. Besides, if the above three countries are all on board with that project, it would then not be appropriate to say that "the West deliberatly threw Russia into the arms of China", but rather "Russia pretended" to have been trown etc., woulld it? And if Russia was indeed thrown into China's arms against its wills or plans, then Russia is not complicit in the plot, is it?
I'm not saying your hunch is wrong, but I find difficult to understand how such a theatrical and convoluted play may have been scripted in such detail, most of all when there was no need for it, which later consideration is what mostly makes me feel it does not add up. Covid has proved most of the world's population is conformist enough to swallow whatever piece of garbage it is fed. The whole thing baffles me.
Having the same issues. But maybe we, the plebs, have more power than we think we have. Military and Police people have families too. You need all this propaganda to keep the majority in line. At least to give all them cowards a reason not to act.
See what happened to all communist regimes. Even if people do not revolve, they won't play along either. They may find loopholes. So keeping us plebs occupied with nonsense, keep us divided through "elections" and useless wars is still a necessity it seems. And it is for sure much cheaper than pure violence and suppression. Let's not forget: The best slave is the slave who doesn't know he's a slave. Ensure the rats keep running in their little rat race and change the system step by step in the background is considered safe and effective it seems ;-)
Maybe you're right. I'm very confused. Too many factors are in play for my limited brain and knowledge. And yet, the scamdemic was the most eye-opening event in my entire life: we've all witnessed how easy it is to brainwash people to comply with the unitary mindset, without needing to kill anyone (leaving aside the millions dead as a consequence of the injected medications). 99,9% of the world's governments synchronously agreed on lockdowns and restrictions because the World Rulers wanted it so. I do not see why they cannot do the same with economic restructuring. But what the hell do I know... :-(
Same for me with the plandemic. And as Germans, we were educated about the exact same thing about Third Reich over and over again. And now it happened before my very eyes. Everyone obeyed blindly and I felt people would have killed me because of opposition if Government would just have allowed it. I think, people deserve their slavery and holocaust. If they just wouldn't drag me with them into their dirty grub.
That is exactly what I recently wrote to a Russian friend of mine, who had told me she had not the smallest intention of moving a finger on behalf of this stupefied society, which deserves what it gets. I replied almost with your very same words: I wouldn't do anything, too, if only I weren't doomed to live in this society and to descend to hell with it!
By the way, I for one also felt that I would have got killed by the fury of the rabble if Government had allowed it. :-)
And how "it is exactly", oh troll of trolls? What is it that "perfectly explains the situation", oh ubiquitous goblin of the blogosphere? What is the "old plan" and how it is exactly laid out, oh erudite oracle? Where is it "open and freely available", oh learned soothsayer? What are those infallible accurate sources of yours, oh master of the keyboard?
Instead of preaching around with your alleged wisdom and flooding the blogs with your inexhaustible torrent of cryptic -and almost unintelligible- words, what about coming up with some facts, some reliable information, some good translations, some concrete, precise and irrefutable explanation of all that happens? Ever thought of devoting your unquenchable energies in enlightening us the initiates, the ignoramuses, rather than endlessly pontificating and boasting of an arcane knowledge that I do not see materialised in anything useful?
Speak, oh thou augur, fountain of wisdom! Share your hidden secrets with us, thou lord of palmistry!
"But even the meannest person has a little conscience, and it could have been as simple as shaking hands on the economic restructuring and just do it by mutual agreement..."
The international bankster/gangsters cannot directly implement their plans as there's numerous insidious machinations which need to be implemented prior to fully establishing a total economic restructuring. Even with the scamdemic a ton of intense synchronized propaganda was deployed to terrorize populations in order to gain compliance.
That's why these predators always use benevolent sounding terms to fool the trusting and naive.
In the case of geogstrategic politics, the ghouls find it useful to coral folks into a variety of "manageable ideological camps." So they create the "illusion" of acrimony between the worldwide gangster cartel, however, these hoodlums always are in agreement on exploiting populations and are allowed to do as they wish as long it doesn't oppose Global Empire. So Russia, China, and the US are hassling over plunder and strategy, but all three are determined to create a technocracy digitalizing the entire population utilizing a central bank digital currency and biosecurity surveillance.
But, Charlotte, the way I see it, the ton of intense syhchronized propaganda was extremely easy and cheap for them to deploy. In the term of a couple of weeks, the entire world was convinced they faced death if not wearing a mask. Only a few months later the world complied with being incarcerated in their own homes for months in a row and even leaned out of their windows at 8 pm sharp to synchronously applaud the jailers. What can be worse than prison? Imagine a similar media campaign to tell the world's population that Russia, China and the US have agreed on worldwide economic restructuration and digital IDs for the sake of our safety, health and welfare. Do you think the masses would seriously oppose?
We'll find out most probably.
The British and French would not be toppled so easily, I think. But we didn't get any info about the French during the first try, so this is just guessing.
Hey Freelander.
You ask good questions for sure, I have only one nugget of answer, all the bloody 'steps' you describe are very lucrative, aren't they?
take care
Indeed they are. That's a valid point I've thought of sometimes. A few weeks ago Dima (of the Military Summary channel) expressed his opinion that this no-war would not end before there take place some fighter jets battles, so both armies can test their own armament in real-life scenarios. Very cynical but perhaps correct prediction. Maybe this is all about military industrial complexes testing their weaponry and making money.
It is obviously the case that it is a testing ground like all wars but there is another aspect that has emerged about weapons. It seems that a lot of weapons sent to Zelenski's regime, as CBS (from memory) documented for instance never reach the front and are sold on the black market. Some African leader said that some have already flown on the continent to fuel the Russian/ 5 eyes wars there. Many European police officers in many places have given warnings.
A f... lot of weapons going only God knows where and probably to non-state actors which could be mafias of course but also Stay Behind like groups in the EU...
sounds like you've read some of my comments....https://www.unz.com/ejones/why-its-easier-to-talk-to-a-robot-than-to-a-jew/
Looks like an interesting article, albeit damned long. I'm bookmarking it for future reading. Which are your comments? What's your handle in that thread?
like you...I had previously commented that if the US NATO Russia and China are all part of the great reset agenda why bother with the "war" in Ukraine and the scamdemic with its clot shots...they have control of the military and the ability to make all the draconian laws they want to...why the need for all this three dimensional chess If they are in fact all in on the same new world order/ great reset agenda? personally I find it hard to believe the U.S. and their evil twin Israel would want to give up their role as the worlds "super power"
Totally agree. That's what keeps baffling me. They have the world's population in their fist. Can do whatever they want with us. Why bother playing this theatre, or any other?
The explanation Bugey Libre suggests--that the war is very lucrative--is plausible, and yet, I'd say they don't really need any wars to multiply their profit. The world is theirs!
UNLESS..! Unless we are overdoing our red-pilling. Perhaps, after all, those three countries are not so much in collusion. Perhaps WEF & Co. do not really control China. Perhaps the CCP has its own agenda that only partly overlaps the WEF's. I've been to China a few times and, quite frankly, it did not strike me as the kind of society walking towards feminism, degenerate LBTQism, indiscriminate immigration or environmentalism; although of course is one of the most citizen-controlling countries I've ever visited.
you can't have a mass world police society, even with what they plan as their control mechanism (digital ID, bioinformation access, central bank digital currency knowing everything you spend on and ability to control what and when you spend through negative interest rates). what they want is internalization of the dictats so that they don't have to go around cracking heads all of the time, because cracking heads is inefficient.
they need us to submit. how better than that they have "heroes" face off and then suffer defeat? demoralize the populace, and show that "there is no alternative" even if we can still dream of one (remember 1984? "the proles will save us!").
as for the "lucrativeness" of the MIC contracts, that's just a sideshow. what they really desire is free disposal of old mode war materiel. very expensive to take that crap and try to de-arm it following any kind of environmental regs. this is quite similar to the 9.11 plot to destroy a building full of asbestos rather than remediate, because remediation would bankrupt any owner except the Big-gov, and obviously the gov didn't want to do it (endless years arguing over how to do it, permitting, environmental studies, contractors grifting, and "taxpayers" yelling about waste) being a side show to the main attraction which was to bring war to the M.East and full spectrum spying on the domestic populace (and do away with habeas corpus) to keep us "safe".
their plans usually always are set up to attain multiple goals at once. the new warfare will not be carried on at all like the last century's warfare was (mechanized, drones, sensors, etc instead of big machines run by faulty humans), and you need a way to get rid of that crap and justify buying new crap. and that crap is intended to be used against US when we inevitably don't want to go alone with their full control and rapine.
''Incidentally, Lary Fink CEO of BlackRock, has said on more than one occasion that he admires China's political system as liberal democracies tend to be too messy.''
Liberal Democracy is one of the most brutal regimes on the planet... The Party in 1984 could do with a rebranding. The Liberal Democracy
Neoliberal economics compounded by imperialist plunder is vicious, but
viciousness is characteristic of all Empire's. I'm sure you'll enjoy the upcoming technocratic neofeudal transhumanist surveillance state.
I'm a young global leader, looking forward to becoming an immortal cyborg.
Musk is advertising onTwitter for Neuralink volunteers.😁
Neoliberal economics by definition requires austerity and rentier capitalism (the FIRE sector) primacy. Even without a military or network of spy agencies, NGOs and cutouts, neoliberal economics wreaks havoc on countries. Look at what Thatcherism and Reaganism did to the UK and US respectively. No military imperialist invasions needed; just a population of suckers.
I mentioned that neoliberalism is a predatory form of capitalism. Something which does wreak havoc everywhere since it's the kind of business model which allows the worst creatures to run rampant and uncontrolled while being protected by the security state. That being said, small market capitalism "eliminating" monopolistic monsters and techno/fascists would be much more desirable. However, I personally have no wish to jump from the fying pan into the technocratic transhumanist neofeudal fire. Btw, China has more billionaires than other country and many are in the Communist Party. Evidently, decades of Western social engineering projects have been very profitable for the socialists with biosecurity surveillance characteristics.
Well said mate. Truer words have never been spoken or said
You wrote:
"It might be very possible, the West deliberately through Russia into the arms of China in order to hasten the worldwide economic restructuring currently underway ..."
Indeed, because why else would Jim O'Neill, former Goldman Sachs hotshot and current chairman of the Chatham House promote BRICS and dedollarization?
"Jim O’Neill, the former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. chief economist who coined the acronym BRIC, said the bloc of nations that later adopted the name should expand and work to counter the dollar’s dominance.
In a paper published in the Global Policy journal on March 26, O’Neill called on the group to apply strict criteria to ensure the addition of any new members to its ranks helps further its aims and urged it to focus on climate finance, improving healthcare and boosting trade.
“The US dollar plays a far too dominant role in global finance,” he wrote. “Whenever the Federal Reserve Board has embarked on periods of monetary tightening, or the opposite, loosening, the consequences on the value of the dollar and the knock-on effects have been dramatic.”
Brazil, Russia, India and China established BRIC in 2009 and the bloc became BRICS a year later when South Africa was admitted. If it expands to include other “emerging nations with persistent surpluses,” a globally fairer, multi-currency global system could emerge, O’Neill said."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/o-neill-urges-brics-bloc-to-expand-challenge-dollar-s-dominance
Archived link: https://archive.ph/SckQq
A very timely and important discussion!
You definitely deserve a subscription, Riley!
And Mrs. Bechet-Golovko writes IMMIGRANTS! (Instead of "migrants".) She has earned my everlasting admiration. Only a person really aware (and beware!) of the globalists' manipulative vocabulary and semantics is capable of realizing the deceitful and delusionary meanings their words portray.
Plus, if that weren't enough, I think she has nailed the four pillars of globalism: sustainability and climate change, digital cult, immigration and gender relativism.
This sentence, though, I am unable to decipher: "[...] which, once you leave the front, is incompatible with Moscow’s gentle hesitation and desire for normalization, regardless of the human cost." I would appreciate any clarification. To what refers the word "which": to inhibition, to strengthening patriotism or to population? What is "Moscow's gentle hesitation"? What does "normalization" mean here? What "human cost" does she refer to?
The problem with war and patriotism nowadays is, in my opinion, that life has become too easy for most of the world's population, except in some African and Middle East countries. We have not lived in war times for the last eight decades, which means most of the people today alive have never experienced a war, and at the same time have lived a relatively easy life. On the other hand, religious and patriotic beliefs, which have historically been the main forces pushing people to make war (besides, of course, hunger and physical suffering) are (probably because of science and the widespread global world idea) in clear decline. Give someone food, a roof, health care, some little money and a smartphone, and he'll be the most reluctant person to take a gun and die for his nation, or for anything except perhaps his family. Why should he? Me being the first one to run away from any armed conflict I might possibly be pushed to. So, I understand the difficulty of talking Russians into willingly going to war, even for the noblest and most patriotic cause.
I see many people talking about the "1917 scenario", but I am convinced such a thing is impossible. Present-day societies do not meet the necessary requirements. We live, thanks God, too comfortably for risking our lives. The ubiquitous talks about heroic Russia having never been defeated are, in my opinion, puerile and misguided. No empire was ever defeated, until it was, either in war or by time itself. Predicting what Russians will do now on the basis of what _those_ Russians of yore did long time ago is like predicting the next result of the dice based on the previous throws. That Russia of 1917, and even that of 1941, has little to do with the one of today, like those Romans of Christ's times or those Spaniards of XVth century have nothing in common with the Italians of Spaniards of today.
Lastly, I can personally confirm Karine's opinion about the Western "alt-media". I for one turned my eyes to Russia not only for my lifelong sympathy towards that country (which I still have), but "against" my own country --as she says--, for I feel I do not belong to it any more and I needed something to believe in. Thus, for many months I swallowed the narrative of those media, which is more anti-USA or anti-imperialism than it is pro-Russia. And, yet, it did not fully convince me, for I am very critical and there were some contradictions I could not sort out (like for instance Russia's full compliance with the scamdemic). And so of late I have turned to more red-pilled sources like your blog or Rolo's, where I am finding ideas and information a lot more consistent with reality. And I am glad and grateful, despite having needed to experience the bitterness of lost dreams.
Thank you for the support (and very thoughtful comment), Freelander!
As to your question: Karine is saying that Moscow is pursuing a policy of pretending that the war is not a war ("normalization"), even though it may cost more human lives in the end. And she points out that this is, of course, incompatible with patriotic sentiments in the country.
riley
Thanks! I got it now.
Yes. Much of this applies exactly to myself. Esp. the last para.
The conflict isnt simply two nation states at war...
There are other actors, drivers - Global corporations...
It's apparent Putin is constrained by powerful political-economic forces...
Yes, here I got a new and better dream: to be free of your sour replies to my comments. Be true to your word about me not worrying and help fulfill my dream.
Insult is the last resource of dimwits. It was written you'd end up trying to offend. But if you--as it looks--are unable to curb your Freelander addiction, I sure prefer your childish insults over your incoherent gibberish. At least they are hilarious.
At this point noosfera, you should consider changing the way you interact with people online, shouldn't you? Your comments sometimes bring insightful Data... Just saying.
Yeah yeah yeah daddy of course I won't be mean in your comments section. BUT, since I was part of that griftependent alt media brainrot dummypants crew, I'm entitled to bag on myself. That person who told you you're NPR, or CNN, or whatever evil WEEEEEEEEEEEEEST entity you work for, I'm very familiar. After funnelling hard earned money into her coffers (long before she worked for Russia today and became religiously affiliated with our father who art in the Kremlin, Vlady "patron saint of the superhuman anti-west" daddy) to go get stories all over the global south, I decided to do some shite posting just like Iain cuz I was tired of the stenography of Russian state media. Her army of brainless simps with a plethora of "BUT THE WEEEEEEEEEEEEEST" cliches dogpiled on me on Twitter, and dm'd hate mail.
Bottom line my beautiful guy, these people are brainless. You shouldn't take other people's absolute and total stupidity as your failing, just leave it at (either) they're either stupid from birth or paid to be stupid (both in some cases). Keep doin you brosef. You're doing more than the entirety of griftependent media with your one blog.
As you probably know, I'm pretty hands-off with comments -- although on my last post, I tried to encourage people to be gentle, as a gesture of good-will, etc. etc.
Your comment is much appreciated though. Mostly because it was entertaining, but also because you described me as "beautiful". In my 35 years on Earth, no one has ever used that word to describe me, so I encourage you to comment more.
I appreciate your readership and support.
riley
Great interview of a very bright mind, translated by a no less bright mind done by another fortunately often funny (and aspiring cornerstone) bright mind Riley Waggaman!
As an aside, I think I might have a plan to make any "artifice of intelligence" permanently "burn out". Let's ask any chat gpt (in French tha acronym sounds like "i farted") to translate Modeste's daily article in Mongolian, Chinese or Korean, or Tongan.... simultaneously of course;
Thank you.... Spaciba... Merci à vous trois.
Respect
Thank you for introducing me to Karine's work, Bugey!
hope you are well my friend,
riley
Thanks, Riley. This is your best piece I've read, IMHO. You wouldn't find this anywhere else:
"China is one of the central countries of globalization, and ideologically its vision of man and society are extremely dangerous for Russia, especially since both nations are followers of the digital cult."
I must confess, that is one of the quiotes in this interview I less understand. Why China's vison of man and society are so dangerous for Russia ESPECIALLY since both worship the digital cult?
Maybe because China has most of the rare earth and their 'refining' and already has advance in industrial producing of the tech tools necessary for the delirium of the digital cult crowd, thus programing them at their will and ultimately control the whole thing...
Even without that conflation, it seems you don't understand, either. Otherwise you'd provide an explanation, instead of suggesting you savvy.
You are already wasting your time with a retard like myself, which makes you a worse one.
Make yourself worthy of being nicely asked and I might give you the opportunity of showing off your knowledge.
Haven't swung by as of late Mr Riley, apologies.
Interesting how the prediction Wagner's eagerness to retreat pre-faced a Ukrainian offensive, turned out to be the case.
Your neo-liberals may not have (yet) suffered from the Russian-AstraZeneca clotshot, but the London neo-liberals have already started to tumble, with Saddo Khan suffering a heart attack:
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/sadiq-khan-suffered-heart-attack-at-cop26-glasgow/
I chalk it up to all the Londoners "upgrading" all of his ULEZ cameras with the 'wireless' (and offline) 'functionality', trigger him to have a stress attack.
Neo-liberals of course won't disappear or end up mysteriously with their heads on a pike ('their heads on a pike or our bodies in a grave', as the saying goes), just short of them being dumb enough to fall into their own spike traps, and whilst some are exceedingly dumb, I think the majority need the public's help finding the nearest Kanada-style "MAID" service to receive Aktion-T4 approved Turdeau poison cocktail special.
Did you read the report how the Kanada Aktion T4 wants to murder all the poor people?
Apparently one third of Kanadians are okay with killing the poor, specifically, the homeless:
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canada-maid-assisted-suicide-homeless
I think that without a wider perspective on the global powers cartel going back in time we can't figure out what is going on here. Why Russia was not dismantled in the 90-ties for example? She was weak enough but Kissinger, Bush and Clinton were eager to help and to put a strong man in charge. What do you think about the following perspective? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X8xF74mq9bM&t=9s&pp=ygUsdGhlIHNlY3JldCByZWFsaXR5IGJlaGluZCB0aGUgcnVzc2lhbiBlbXBpcmU%3D
"They banned my blog" - Sad, really sad, it had great content. That was really quick :( You can still try to run a wordpress site. Yes, hahaha, "biocosmism", I came upon this shit yesterday on this account. https://twitter.com/SRQSmartyPints/status/1650369035614269441
Thanks again, Riley. The elites are thriving, while the 99.9% eat s*%t. Hmm, sounds like over here in the US. :-)
i'm far from elite, but i eat well. the trick is not to have any dependents or large material needs.
I too eat well. For NOW! One of these days, they'll require you to have a digital pass to get food, because the only legal form of exchange will be CBDCs.. I'm not for any form of exchange, but that's something that only society in large numbers can change, meaning a social insurgency. Till then, the availability of good food will be contingent upon being able to buy it (can't grow much here in the city), and sooner or later you will be coerced or you won't eat.
Yes Bank of Canada is developing CBDC and there is a survey you can take now to discourage them.
If you live in Canada, that is.
Not seldom I come to think, once they impose on us CBDCs as the only form of legal exchange, eventually some populations (or many) may spontaneously come up with some popularly accepted currency, like silver or gold coins for instance. Not saying it will happen, but it's a possibility.
Good luck. I think we'd be better off just doing without exchange, like humans did for over 99% of our species' history.
Sure. But I hope we both agree in that doing without exchange is impossible nowadays. Imagine a pensioneer with no skills, producing nothing, without even a garden to grow tomatoes. How'd he do without exchange?
i think barter has been rather common throughout most of our history. it still works today.
Most of our history wasn't even barter, just sharing, tribes were like families. Between tribes, barter of incidental surpluses, with arrangements to prevent excessive accumulations, such as Potlatch.
The problem I see is that very few people hold some gold and silver... maybe tobacco could become a new currency, indeed tobacco has always been used in carceral condition as currency after all... Let's hope creativity will arise.
Silver can be bought with CBDCs (unless they program the DCs so we can't do it), or before "normal" money stops working. Silver is cheap. The lowest denominations are less than 10 €, which is suitable for small commerce. A few years ago a friend of mine, a bit eccentric, foreseeing all this authoritarianism bought a ton of silver coins, just in case. At that time I thought him to be a fool. Now I don't. :)
Thank you for this. It inches forward the understanding of the politically naive such as myself. I'll tell you what would be a greater 'incher forward' for such as I and it would be to spell out clearly to us what would be the desired reforms that are NOT 'neoliberal' or 'globalist'.
That's a good question. I love the criticism made in Riley's and some other's blogs, but I miss proposed solutions. I've already asked several times in different "red-pilled" blogs who is, according to their authors' or commenters' opinions, the better leader to replace Putin, but so far I have not got the shade of an answer.
Yet another evasive. Nonexistent persons cannot hold office. So, in order to answer that question, we must first know _who_ might that better one be. Who is your candidate?
At least you concede I have a brain. I wish I could say the same about you.
Zelenzky talking about Russia before the 2014 Coup...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3nLWtrjyt0
Good find! Very helpful to a lot of people.
Thanks for the Q&A, Riley.
what do the perpetrators behind 9/11 and the 2014 coup in Ukraine have in common? they all belong to the same tribe as Zelenzky...Nuland...Kagan...Blinken...Garland...Silverstein...and Ehud Barak...oy vey......https://www.amazon.com/Solving-9-11-Deception-Changed-World/dp/0985322586#customerReviews
Excuse my ignorance but I sometimes get the impression that everything in the western world belongs to 'the tribe'. They seem to appear everywhere or are claimed to be there. When they are not there the commentators generally claim their grandparents or such were there or at the very least they 'have connections'.
That's a clear impression I'm given by the readings I've had.
But I get another impression, too: 'the tribe' seems to be present on both sides of whatever conflict or political manoeuvring we are looking at.
In truth that seems to be the case. That 'the tribe' is neither on this side nor that but is so ubiquitous, truly, that in the end it is on all sides.
Whereas the third clear impression I get is that I'm being told incessantly about the 'presence' of 'the tribe' here and there in order to have me believe they're an organised baleful menace and the reason behind all our (western) world's ills.
I currently believe it is canard, a red herring.
you are being told incessantly about the presence of the tribe? bullshit...what you are being told incessantly is that they are the eternal victims of anti semitism and that they dont control the media and thus the narrative...you trollin here bro?...https://www.unz.com/ejones/why-its-easier-to-talk-to-a-robot-than-to-a-jew/
It was not 'bullshit'.
I am not told incessantly about their victimisation.
Your link leads to something I haven't completely read or studied as yet. I may some time in the future and I may not. I do not look forward to it for what I did read here and there amongst it seemed to indicate it to be mostly specious 'argumentation' which is always very dreary and even annoying to read. Especially as one usually does it in order to help correct the thinking of some person with a bee in their bonnet fueled by a bunch of misapprehensions.
One gets tired of trying to make people 'see the light'.
I noted, for instance, this:
"When Harari tells us “We’ve just encountered an alien intelligence, not in outer space but here on earth,”[6] the conclusion becomes inescapable. He is talking about himself and the group which gives him his identity, namely, the Jews. "
Now that is simply absurd.
what's absurd is your entire incoherent babbling diatribe...are you taking psychotropic drugs by any chance
No. That's presumptive and contrary to my implication. I implied, I think, when I pointed to presence on both sides, that their efforts were supportive of their respective sides. That they were effectively at war with themselves in this.
Furthermore 'presiding over' is your introduction. That's what they call a straw man isn't it? When you introduce something that wasn't there in the first place and then knock it down? With the twist that this time you didn't knock it down but rather use it as the main peg of your argument. Just what device that is I don't know, I'm not logician enough nor clever enough. But I do know it is a perversion of the truth.
In fact they are long way from 'presiding over' the people I point to. For I point to the presence regardless of position and some are in relatively high places and some are poverty stricken. As a child in the UK during WWII there were such people in high places in the Govt & military of the UK, I believe, just as there were in Germany (despite the pogroms) and there were such living down our street in the humblest circumstances.
The bombs that rained down on us rained down on them.
This is stretching this out to boredom length but I'm new out of bed this morning and all fired up with the first coffee and feeling loquacious:
when it comes to the 'tribe winning' it seems to me they need do nothing after the style of the things often ascribed to them. they do not need to manipulate the world so that this side wins or that side wins. They need only stand aloof. Their religion says that they must quietly suffer and obey and then eventually they get to heaven and fulfill their contract with god.
Their aim, I'm saying, is religious, sectarian, not really worldly at all.
It is ironic that they so often 'rise' to positions of wealth, positions of 'intellect', shall we say, positions of power when these are not their fundamental objectives. But actually predictable. If you keep your head down and try to live a frugal, good and sensible life in concert with your fellows, each helping the other, these kind of 'successes' will surely come and have done throughout the ages to all kinds of such groups.
I've run out of steam. Need more coffee. Sorry if I bored you.... :)
Good morning or good evening in the numeric no man's land Arthur! Right now it is early in the morning and I am having a 'bullet proof coffee' that unfortunately we can't share.
Your post is interesting and there are many truths in it. Have you ever hear about antinomian Judaïsme? Jewish religion is very complicated... Try for a start with Shabbateism and frankism.
Take care man
I had not heard, no. Perhaps some literature somewhere ( not too tediously scholarly but dumbed down for such as I )? I will not devote a lot of time and energy into trying to understand in detail Jewish religion, I can say that up front, I just don't have sufficient interest, sufficient energy, or given my scatterbrained and butterfly-like wanderings over all the fields of ... what? 'human endeavour' or something? ... 'all the interesting things in the world' ? I won't even have the time....
I am a dilettante ( at best ). :)
https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/israel-conquers-the-world/
Finally someone gives a correct view on the globalist nature of "multi-polarity", Russia needs a new system of social governance, just like any other state. Excellent questions and answers in this interview.
But then why multipolarity suits globalism better than unipolarity? This is one of the questions I have not yet been able to fully understand. The scamdemic was, so to say, "unipolar" and people did not really complain about it.
best way to get a slave to work is to make him think he is FREE.
best way to get him not to rebel is to make him think that he (and/or his group) came up with the rules.
Both polarities serve the globalist scam. Jesuit polarity principle mated with Hegel's triade.
It was not that unipolar sir, some countries didn't go along with the scam, some of these have seen their leaders died or experience coup d'état attempt like in Madagascar and Sweden demonstrated a very different approach...
Indeed it was not unipolar, but Sweden also played along nicely, just in a different chord. Sweden top vaxed, top chiped globalist lab.
About Sweden and our legitimate fear of a tech induced idiocraty:
https://www.francetvinfo.fr/societe/education/numerique-a-l-ecole/suede-apres-avoir-delaisse-les-manuels-scolaires-au-profit-du-numerique-le-pays-fait-machine-arriere_5842562.html
This year, Sweden will buy traditional school books because of a decrease in child ability to read!
Hello,
Sweden is indeed a societal engineering lab and has been so for a long time, maybe even before the sicko Palme. Few people, a large wealth appearing after WWII, a very obedient mindset (think lagom) and a socialist model. A good place for human experimentation. I used to have a relationship with a svenska kvina from a very educated family for 5 years and so spent some times there, even working.
As far as I know, Madagascar and Tanzania (in a lesser degree Sweden too) were the only countries not going with the scam, but they ended up yielding to it. Anyways, I was thinking about the citizenry when I wrote my above comment.
Ok, so there is a big difference between Asian and other human stocks for instance. All humans can be hacked in Harari's meaning but you can't trap everybody with the same "stuff". A guy from let's say Sichuan, has a very different cultural and background than an Italian or a Bambara and it would be very improbable to rule all "ways" of people in the same bag peacefully...
So we should believe in "as no country can really be self-sufficient." Sounds a bit globalist central-bankey to me. Russia couldnt be self suficient? Wow.
Interesting choice for the interview about globalists.
Good question. I believe that statement of Karine's to be essentially wrong. If there is a country in the world that can be self-sufficient, that's the RF (perhaps the US too). There are only two basic types of resources: material and intellectual/technological. The latter can always be developed, and the former are abundant in the RF. Thus, theoretically the RF could become almost totally self-sufficient. However, I am not sure this is realistically possible in the short or mid term, even supposing Moscow wanted to achieve that, which it obviously does not.
no country can be self sufficient at this level of technology/resource usage.
if you want to go back to earlier forms of simpler tech, then yes---localities could be roughly "self sufficient" again. but how far back does anyone want to go?
and then you hit the problem that the USSR supposedly (at least according to western accounts, even granting that USSR was not total autarky) hit---the limits of that mean that you are or appear "behind" everyone else and your people, induced by media and tales of how great the grass is over there, start getting restless.
so no, if we don't want to return to 16th century living standards(which was already semi-global trading, hence all of those explorers looking for alternate trade routes), then we have to press on with intercooperation. the problem is again, how inter and is it cooperation?
In the context of this thread, "self-sufficiency" must be understood in relative terms. If a country's population want to buy Chinese porcelain, iroko furniture or ivory figurines, obviously they need to import those products. But for modern-day living standards, leaving aside rare stuff, all a country needs is basic natural resources (hydrocarbons, uranium, rare earths, etc.) and technology. The former, by definition, cannot be created out of thin air: if you do not have them, you need to buy them. There's no escape to that. But technology can be developed. Theoretically, nothing but technology would prevent Russia from manufacturing everything its society might want so as to not feel they lag behind the rest of the world. That's what I call "self-sufficiency". Sure, there would be still some very small percentage (1%?, 3%?) of goods or raw materials it would neccesarily have to import, but in practical terms I think it'd be acceptable to talk about autarky in that case. No need to resort to the 16th century strawman. :)
then Russia will run into population problem.
because having the "world as your workshop" means the billions toil for it. even with technology, lots of someone's in China/SE Asia are doing it.