Maybe, an investigatigation was already undertaken and completed in 2020 when
three "frontline" health care workers mysteriously fell out of hospital windows in Russia within a two week period of time.
At the early stages of the scamdemic there seemed to be a slew of deaths targeting individuals who might be considered a thorn in the side by the psychos determined to implement a bunch of irrational protocols including injecting populations with an experimental toxin.
That being said, Kary Mullis the inventor of PCR technology died a month prior to "Event 201" a Pandemic Exercise involving Gates, WEF, and John Hopkins University.
Then there's the odd death of Brandy Vaughn a popular activist who questioned the safety of childhood vaccines. And how about the four african leaders who weren't thrilled with mRNA technology.
There's no doubt that everything about the scamdemic was synchronized and Russia's good friend China was leading the pack in the worldwide terror campaign.
So although China, Russia, and the US seem to be at odds it's remarkable how they're always in agreement about establishing an authoritarian biosecurity surveillance state.
Here's the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union and its Eurasian Development Bank making the UN/WHO proud and telling us how great PCR tests are for "free travel" (eastern "multipolar" Orwellianism has nothing to envy its western "unipolar" peers') and "free market" business:
"Tigran Sargsyan: Digital transformation plays a pivotal role in the emerging economic landscape
15 May 2023
“We are pleased that the COVID-19-Free Travel mobile app, the flagship project of our Fund, was honoured with the Sustainable Awards in Technology Development by ADFIAP last year. Thank you for this recognition,” said Tigran Sargsyan."
The first project of the Digital Initiatives Fund of the Eurasian Development Bank. The application is designed for people planning to travel to the EAEU countries. It can be used to find laboratories performing coronavirus PCR tests located nearby and included in the program, and make an appointment. The test results are sent to the application in the form of a QR code to be used at the border crossing."
At this point, feeding any hopes the Kremlin is somehow gonna stop coordinating international issues with those Russia has been coordinating international issues with for centuries to take the side of humanity is nothing short of derangement.
I'm Russian who lives in Russia. I myself wrote in 2021 a lot of letters to The Prosecutor General’s Office, to FSB, to deputies asking to forbid WHO in Russia. We are together then before the SMO with those who are now is for killing people the other way ( I use hints for I could be prosecuted). It's nothing, I mean this answer which is mentioned. Trust me. I'm inside for all my life and I'm reading all this stuff in original language.
Those who were against vaxes and such were together until Feb.2022. After then most of the "antivax" movement in Russia decided that SMO is a way out of the agenda while it's just a part of it. All these resourses like Катюша etc. are for the war. For depopulation as the next act of the agenda's tragedy. They are the controlled opposition. They want people to be killed not with injections of poison but the common way: bombing, shooting etc. Citing these resources isn't a proper view of situation now. As for my hints, now I'm so brave to tell it more openly. I could be prosecuted for my opinion like in the stalin's times!!!! You couldn't understand what Russia is. For you it's like Central Africa for me. And English isn't my mother tongue. My language is Russian.
"Those who were against vaxes and such were together until Feb.2022. After then most of the "antivax" movement in Russia decided that SMO is a way out of the agenda while it's just a part of it."
It's the same in much of the West; dissidents of various stripes were starting to see that maybe the "East" isn't so good after all considering how eagerly they participated in the covid operation. But then the war came along and suddenly every one jumped back into their pre-covid camps of cheering for Russia, BRICS, the multipolar stuff etc. Very dumb and has made me lose a lot of interest and respect for many actors in "alternative media".
BRICS and the multi polar stuff is staving off the One World Government. So, for the moment at least, Russia is not part of the NWO but a stumbling block.
The SMO is necessary in order to protect the people of Donbass, Crimea and to prevent Sevastopol form being taken over by US & NATO.
Of those who claim as you, none can tell me what Putin should have done instead.
The SMO is being used by the Globalists to depopulate that is true, but that is not of Putin's doing. The West has turned a simple operation into a depopulation program by continually re-arming the dying army of Ukraine.
At this point even if Russia pulls out of Ukraine, the people of Donbass and Crimea will be sorted out by the SBU, Nazis & AFU and genocided. As they have already done in Kherson and other places after RU troops pulled back.
" BRICS and the multi polar stuff is staving off the One World Government. So, for the moment at least, Russia is not part of the NWO but a stumbling block. "
Are you sure ? BRICS is pushing for one common currency and an economic block of nations. The US is trying to create a North American Union, most likely with with another single currency. Eventually, the world will be divided in a few blocks. At some juncture world " peace " will be achieved, at which point, the UN will question the necessity of these blocks and corresponding currencies and propose they all be merged into one then the trap will be shut. Orwell's 1984 was not a work of fiction but a guide book.
I agree...what I mean is that there won't be a "one" world government as long as there are two blocks. I'm not saying that any of the blocks will be good.
Not everybody is controlled opposition. However, the propaganda pushers who were inside Russia like Soros affiliates and the CIA, along with western media and Hollywood/Entertainment-Complex have done their job, and many younger Russians who did NOT get suckered by the covid-scam, DID get suckered by the Anti-Russia scam and do not support the SMO.
I've met them. I've spoken to them. They don't understand who the Ruling Elite are or how they operate, fully. They don't even know or care that Donetsk region has been shelled most to every day of the week for 9 years.
You might be one of those!
It doesn't matter what the motive is when someone is trying to murder your family, you stop them with lethal force first and later worry about his motives.
Good article, thanks for the share - I have wandered the globe since 1976 and always astonished at how pervasive American culture is, encountering it in the most surprising ways and in the most remote locations. Music, especially, cannabalized local traditions, I found, and it was rare to hear ethnic music unless at some kind of 'folk' event.
Any positive news as to the WHO, mandatory jabs, vax passports, public health "measures" for the safety of one and all ( about whom "they" care deeply, dontcha know ) ...... can only be believed once seen.
Safer that we be Skeptics, All.
Feel free to be optimistic. - but the PCR test ? Even Kerry Mullis is on video stating it is NOT intended, nor qualified, to be used as a diagnostic measure. Interesting to note that he 'passed away' not long before the whole covid debacle began, eh ?
It was never a virus, always nanotechnology poisoning. "PCR tests" are designed to instill nanotechnology, these "vaccines" are designed to inject nanotechnology, and "masks" are designed to inhale nanotechnology.
The question is who sticks with whom, and who wants to rip off whom
I don't get it. Please explain. What is the 'nanotechnology' threat? I have a vague idea it is somethng about putting 'nano' (i.e. very tiny) 'machines' or 'id tags' or such into all of us so's we can be tracked, monitored, constantly. That's the only idea I have. What do you say it is all about?
That's why they want everyone to adopt this nanotech poison - for biometrics, digital identification and transactions, but also for control, mind control, sterilization, killing and weakening people.
THIS IS UTOPIA. Nanotechnology is TOXIC and deadly.
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!) - PCR TEST!!!!
There's currently no evidence about e.g. advanced, self-assembling, mobile nanobots, as some claim. Unless e.g. mRNA itself and any manipulation at nanoscale is redeclared as nanotechnology.
There are however several studies confirming graphene sheets, tubes and filaments can cut up the endothelium (inner lining of the blood vessels), can lead to cell death, tumors and many other detrimental effects. (See many examples posted by Outraged Human here). Neurological applications with applied electromagnetic radiation are rudimentarily being researched. But they can't simply inject someone to turn them bio-synthetically trans-human, yet (as e.g. Karen Kingston's substack claims).
Of course I could be wrong and they've back-engineered some alien-tech, but I go with currently available evidence.
DARPA & Co. of course feel greatly flattered by many people believing they were geniuses in possession of advanced nanotechnology such as "black goo" and "morgellons" and synthetic biology, because it makes people fear them even more, but there is no evidence - darkfield microscopy and Raman spectroscopy alone won't cut it for me.
I'll now hide behind the couch, to avoid "...but, but, but I have Morgellons, you can't imagine the pain, you insensitive person", "I feel the nanobots in my brain", and "nanoscale=graphene= nanotech=QuintaColumna"-type comments.
I believe Karen Kingston, Marie Zeee, Quinta Columna & al are controlled opposition, because they have not brought conclusive evidence.
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
The toxicity and toxicity mechanisms of these nanomaterials have been known for a long time. They pretend to be idiots and make fools of us, while science says it is toxic and can potentially kill.
If you read this study on the toxicity of carbon / graphene-based materials, you will see that this is "Covid" and all the adverse effects after this injection....
You don't need to be injected to get the nano - its in a lot of things now, and moving into the food chain. I don't know my status, tho no injection for me, I did get 4 rabies booster and IgG for rabies exposure in 2020. I was mighty scared to do so, but necessity of rabies exposure pushed me to it. I hear dental Lidocaine and some say insulin as well contained fibers. They dust the skies and coat the ground with such as well. I work on my bio energy field and EMF mitigation at home, and at work too. I am trying to drink filtered water Alexpure style, and maybe create structured water to try out. EDTA cream and working on the EDTA IV.
US firm combines nanotechnology, blockchain for COVID-19 immunity passports
April 15, 2020
U.S.-based quantum dot producer Quantum Materials Corp (QMC) announced its blockchain-based QDX HealthID for transparency in disease testing and immunization for infectious diseases. The goal is to ensure the authenticity of health data and support individuals to re-join the workforce quickly.
Quantum dots are nanoparticles made up of semiconductor materials that emit different colors when illuminated by light. This color depends on their size and the way they were manufactured. QMC has developed a track and trace solution using quantum dots and blockchain to verify the origin of products and counterfeiting.
The authentication solution is combined with QDX HealthID for monitoring and tracking the outbreaks of diseases, such as the COVID-19. The solution authenticates individuals being tested, the persons administering the test, and the test kits. Update: the COVID-19 solution uses the same authentication, but at this stage does not use quantum dots on packaging.
In simpler terms, QDX HealthID ensures that testing data is secure and not tampered with. Currently, health reports and medical certificates are being issued on paper, which makes them easy to forge.
“Not only does this service facilitate improved health outcomes for patients, but it also underpins back-to-work certifications, sometimes referred to as immunization passports,” said Stephen B. Squires, President & CEO of QMC.
With the health data backed by blockchain, governments and health agencies can formulate new plans and safety measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 and other diseases. Additionally, individual users can assess their immunization passport using a mobile application. The app features color-coded indicators — green, yellow, and red. If the app shows the green indicator, the individual has clearance to interact in social and work environments. This indicator can be shared and authenticated by others using a QR code.
Nanoparticles could also reach the lungs if nanoparticles are not firmly embedded in the face mask material. Acute effects in humans arising from inhalation of silver nanoparticles include lung failure, increased heart rate and decreased arterial blood oxygen pressure.”
“Passage of inhaled nanoparticles into the bloodstream was demonstrated in one human study (Nemmar et al 2002), but two other similar studies have failed to show such a translocation. Another potential route of translocation of inhaled nanoparticles is the olfactory nerve in the nose leading to the olfactory bulb of the brain. 13C nanoparticles with a size about 35 nm were detected in the brain olfactory bulb after inhalation exposure.
When considering the potential human health risks of nanoparticles, inhalation is thought to be the exposure route of highest concern. The calculated deposition fraction of few layer graphene (FLG) with different lateral dimensions ranging from 0.001 to 100 μm in the nasopharyngeal, tracheobronchial, and alveolar regions revealed that there would be substantial deposition of these nanoplatelets throughout the respiratory tract. Findings from several recent studies indicate that graphene and graphene oxide (GO) may induce the acute inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis in mice lungs.
Considering the wide distribution range of graphene sizes in our study, a fraction of graphene likely passed the air-blood barrier and was translocated to liver and spleen. Li et al applied 125I labeled GO to study its distribution in Kunming mice by intratracheal instillation and found that the radioactivity was detected in blood and organs, including liver, spleen and thyroid gland
Nanoparticles may translocate to extrapulmonary organs and may be redistributed to other tissues after deposition in the lung.
Thus, knowledge of graphene biodistribution in mice after inhalation remains a key research gap. FLG may pass through the air-blood barrier into blood and then be delivered to liver and spleen, or enter into the blood via adsorption through the gastrointestinal tract.
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
After 24 h, besides being present in the olfactory bulbs, trace quantities of us-GO translocated to more distant structures, such as the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, midbrain, cerebellum, and the pons and medulla.
In this previous study, splenic macrophages sequestered GO sheets and mediated their structural degradation over a 9-month period.
In conclusion, our results suggest that following the intranasal administration of aqueously dispersed GO sheets, the materials underwent size-dependent translocation to the brain. The smallest sheet size category (us-GO, 10–550 nm) experienced the greatest translocation and was present in every examined brain region, notably in the olfactory bulb.
And we need a 'slogan' or catch phrase to spell out the inadequacy of PCR for the use it is put to.
Perhaps something after the nature of:
"PCR can find a molecule. Not an Illness."
Perhaps something illustrative after the style of "We/it can find calcium in you - that doesn't mean you've got gallstones'. I don't know. I have no talent for it. But there's millions of professional copywriters, advertising men and whatnot that should be able to come up with the right copy.
In fact the situation is even worse than that suggests. For in context they actually can make the machine do sufficient cycles that it will always find what they are looking for which they then improperly present as the discovery of an illness.
One basic problem is the incredible ignorance of the general public - and that extends all the way into the medical profession, for most nurses, nurse's aids, health care workers etc. etc are actually merely 'general public' as regards their wit, acumen, intellectual curiosity.
And a second is the fear of losing one's income. It turns out quite surprisingly to me that the whole workforce is terrified of losing its job whatever it may be. From that masked receptionist at the front counter of the private lab, or chemist shop, or doctor's surgery, to the doctor himself.
Fact. The whole Australian doctoral profession was robbed of its right to practice medicine according to the doctors own good conscience and even the right to speak - they were forbidden to comment on Ivermectin for instance. And I spoke to several of them in the confines of their surgeries.
Where they were sitting before me wearing a mask. No me. They. They were wearing a mask. They scientifically knew the mask was pointless. A plethora of studies showing it. Mere common sense and 'manufacturers recommendations' if you like: any 'masking' is never a 'thing' it is always a process and all steps of the process must be carried out for it to reach maximal effectiveness or claimed effectiveness. And so on. And the well known surgeon's studies in England that showed no increase of infection post surgery when surgeons operated without masks: so they gave them up.
Aware of all this and with regulations relaxed so that I did not have to wear a mask this still sat there before me claiming they 'could not' take it off.
And they told me their reason for complying was that they would be 'in trouble' if they didn't. That's a euphemism for their licences in jeopardy, of course.
Yep.
It is a big deal. And (Western) world wide. More sensible and human places in the world employed ivermectin and got vitamin D and melatonin from being out in the open in the sun - while our totally insane and cowed doctors were telling us to lock ourselves in at home out of the light, forbidden to go out! Etc. But you know.
Yep I know what you mean. Your experience is paralleled in my own life and for sure many, many others.
I don't much like this fashion for blaming it on 'cognitive dissonance' though as though they've found the cause and it is a new thing, a sudden appearance of a contemporary evil arisen in the context of our new evil governments and big businesses and their deliberate misleading of us.
In fact 'cognitive dissonance' is simply the normal process of perceiving a mismatch between expectations or understandings and reality. It is not an evil, it is a good.
If you didn't experience some kind of psychological 'force' when you ran across new information that contradicts your current beliefs you couldn't learn anything new.
So you go down this street believing it leads to the shop and when you get there: no shop.
A feeling of discomfort, perhaps even alarm, mild shock: 'cognitive dissonance'.
This causes you to modify your beliefs.
All good.
The fashion today in some circles in this hysterical age is to try to ban 'cognitive dissonance' !
Which is fairly ludicrous. But it is a ludicrous age.
Of course when we get into beliefs a bit more significant and deeper than simply which street leads to the shop - like beliefs about which science and practitioners of it holds truth and reason and can be relied or - or which societal institutions are good and benevolent and can be relied upon - the clear truth is not as quickly and clearly manifested to us as the absence of a shop on the road is.
So it requires time to process. Much more time. And really: the better the person the longer the time.
The more astute the person the more they will want to consider ramifications at the ongoing end and causations at the ingoing.
And there is a thing comes into play in such 'readjustments' that doesn't in crude realities such as the presence or absence of a shop.
And that 'thing' is value judgements. They become very important. All important.
So we can see this when we consider our own. Our children.
I can be convinced for years that my child is a good child. Though friends and siblings and relatives and school reports and perhaps even incidents with the authorities seem to indicate otherwise.
I may never change my mind. Though I may reluctantly modify my behaviour in many respects. We've all heard of the parents who have to hide valuables and bank accounts and credit cards from drug addicted children is perhaps an instance.
But I may go to the wall in the end for that child because my belief in the child's essential 'good' quality is kinda inextricably bound up with my estimation of my own 'good' quality.
So like what I'm saying is something after the style of 'a word to the wise' is enough.
If 'they' seek to convince me, to demonstrate to me, that I've been holding wrong beliefs about something of rather deep and fundamental importance they should credit me with the intelligence to intake their information and give me time to assess it and put it in context and consider the whole thing. Have some respect for me and some 'tenderness', so to speak, some sympathy with my travail: that I have to come to terms with the idea that my son John is an inveterate scoundrel.
And conversely I must do the same to and for them.
Yes. I see we cannot continue our conversation. You seek to go ad hominem and ascribe me attitudes without cause or need.
Anything, quite clearly, can be an object of fashion or subject of blame according to the vagaries of fashion and irrationality of the populace.
Good and bad are subjective values not existing in themselves but always in context. Given that fact anything can be ascribed a value of relative 'goodness' or 'badness' and even both at the same time.
Hence gravity is good because simply because without it our animal world could not exist and it's natural for us to assume that our very existence is a 'good'.
In the same way I have argued that cognitive dissonance is good.
And I am correct.
If you do not care to take the information in then so be it. That's your cognitive dissonance not being put to the good use I pointed out nature intends it for.
I hadn't seen that quote from the Russian deputy finance minister Timur Maksimov before (one can also wonder why a finance minister has opinions on vaccines but I digress...). Very interesting as that is in line with what arch-globalists in the "West" said:
Merkel
"Germany and other wealthy countries may need to give some of their own stock of vaccines to developing countries in addition to money, since only vaccinating the whole world will end the coronavirus pandemic, Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday.
...
But she told journalists: “I stressed in my intervention that the pandemic is not over until all people in the world have been vaccinated.”"
"We will get out of this crisis by vaccinating France, by vaccinating the world. Because the virus knows no borders. To help all countries in this race, 1 billion doses have been delivered with Covax. Vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. With solidarity. We continue."
"British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will use the Group of Seven wealthy democracies’ summit next week to urge world leaders to commit to vaccinating the global population by the end of 2022.
...
“The world is looking to us to rise to the greatest challenge of the postwar era: defeating COVID and leading a global recovery driven by our shared values,” he says in a statement. “Vaccinating the world by the end of next year would be the single greatest feat in medical history.”
But also with what what the (now former) Chinese equivalent of the CDC director said:
"Gao noted that with the SARS-CoV-2 it is required a vaccination rate of at least 85 percent to build herd immunity, not to mention that there are breakthrough infections.
"What is more important is that it does not depend on how many people in China get vaccinated, but how many people globally get vaccinated, to build real herd immunity which is global rather than in a specific country," Gao noted."
"Countries need to strengthen international cooperation against COVID-19, carry out active cooperation on research and development of medicines, jointly build multiple lines of defense against the coronavirus, and speed up efforts to build a global community of health for all. Of particular importance is to fully leverage vaccines as a powerful weapon, ensure their equitable distribution, quicken vaccination and close the global immunization gap, so as to truly safeguard people's lives, health and livelihoods."
The phrasing may be a little different but the overall message is the same: everyone (more or less) needed to get vaccinated against "covid". This would suggest that they're taking orders from the same central hub, wouldn't it?
Citizens should be Vaccinated to Regain Their Rights!
• We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services. Henry Kissinger, WHO 2009
Kissinger Quote from a speech to the WHO Council on Eugenics, February 25, 2009:
"Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it's game over. They will accept anything - forcible blood or organ donation - "for the greater good". We can genetically modify children and sterilize them --- "for the greater good". Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions. And many of you in this room are investors. It's a big win-win. We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services"
After having scrupulously followed the globalist agenda in the last 3 years, not just in "health" matters, but also in all "green" and "digital" matters, this announcement is remindful of a great American patriot (https://www.israelnationalnews.com/static/pictures/781x439/926868.jpg) announcing the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO. But let's be optimistic and hope that tomorrow Putin will also announce the nationalization of the Bank of Russia.
Just because Russian lawmakers and media seem to have forgotten(?) about the biolabs and are instead copying bad health protocols from the West, it doesn't mean we should gloss over those man-made biological threats too. Yes, it is not possible to create a manmade plague that only kills Russians, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't take it seriously when they're working on such diseases and collecting genetic materials from Russians.
We should probably remind Russians, at least those who're not paid by the IMF, of their own allegations. If a plague against Russians doesn't work (it won't) and the work continues, the result would make Ukrainians sick first, if we're talking about labs in that country. We know from such incidents in Georgia where similar labs exist and residents got sick (anecdotal evidence). Needless to say, we don't know that because of imported PCR tests, but because of good journalists. So it's unclear if those are rare incidents or if more people are affected by whatever comes out of those labs. How would we ever get a full picture if no investigations are launched? Or if those who'd be told to find out just buy more PCR tests instead of actually sending doctors to talk with residents to check if they get sick in an unusual way or unusually often.
To make things even more complicated: All of that was about leaks, but what if they're experimenting with their so-called "self-spreading vaccines" they've been talking about for years? Manmade things that are then released on purpose, for example with mosquitoes? It's more than likely that they'll do most of that work in those leaky labs overseas to avoid accidentally killing themselves. And the mere use of the word "vaccine" causes gullible people to accept and defend this thing (the same people who were hiding at home being afraid of another spreading thing).
Sorry if this was off-topic, but I can't get this phenomenon out of my head.
The WHO reminds me of the old Tiajuana or Mexican border town abortion clinics back in the 50s and 60s , when they used coat hangers as instruments. No offense but the truth is not pretty sometimes. And either is what the WHO has in store for us.
PCR tests are very useful in a plethora of ways, unfortunately they can also be used for unsavory purposes. But the technology is at least very cheap to produce and if allowed citizens can use them on their own in quantity that makes the false positive scams impossible.
Excellent. But, what caught my attention was the statement that the CPRF has been vocally opposed to the Covid measures. Yes, QR codes, and the like. BUT they have NOT challenged the narrative forthrightly. There IS no novel "virus" abroad. That's the core of the matter, imho. "Unprepared", etc., just doesn't get it. We're living a giant HOAX - and a deadly one - the vax is a killer.
Maybe, an investigatigation was already undertaken and completed in 2020 when
three "frontline" health care workers mysteriously fell out of hospital windows in Russia within a two week period of time.
At the early stages of the scamdemic there seemed to be a slew of deaths targeting individuals who might be considered a thorn in the side by the psychos determined to implement a bunch of irrational protocols including injecting populations with an experimental toxin.
That being said, Kary Mullis the inventor of PCR technology died a month prior to "Event 201" a Pandemic Exercise involving Gates, WEF, and John Hopkins University.
Then there's the odd death of Brandy Vaughn a popular activist who questioned the safety of childhood vaccines. And how about the four african leaders who weren't thrilled with mRNA technology.
There's no doubt that everything about the scamdemic was synchronized and Russia's good friend China was leading the pack in the worldwide terror campaign.
So although China, Russia, and the US seem to be at odds it's remarkable how they're always in agreement about establishing an authoritarian biosecurity surveillance state.
Here's the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union and its Eurasian Development Bank making the UN/WHO proud and telling us how great PCR tests are for "free travel" (eastern "multipolar" Orwellianism has nothing to envy its western "unipolar" peers') and "free market" business:
"Tigran Sargsyan: Digital transformation plays a pivotal role in the emerging economic landscape
15 May 2023
“We are pleased that the COVID-19-Free Travel mobile app, the flagship project of our Fund, was honoured with the Sustainable Awards in Technology Development by ADFIAP last year. Thank you for this recognition,” said Tigran Sargsyan."
https://eabr.org/en/press/news/tigran-sargsyan-digital-transformation-plays-a-pivotal-role-in-the-emerging-economic-landscape/
"COVID-Free Travel
The first project of the Digital Initiatives Fund of the Eurasian Development Bank. The application is designed for people planning to travel to the EAEU countries. It can be used to find laboratories performing coronavirus PCR tests located nearby and included in the program, and make an appointment. The test results are sent to the application in the form of a QR code to be used at the border crossing."
https://eec.eaeunion.org/en/comission/department/dotp/klimaticheskaya-povestka/bank/118571/
At this point, feeding any hopes the Kremlin is somehow gonna stop coordinating international issues with those Russia has been coordinating international issues with for centuries to take the side of humanity is nothing short of derangement.
Notice how UN regulations intend to replace inalienable rights.
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/06/investigative-series/sdg16-part-1-building-the-global-police-state/
I'm Russian who lives in Russia. I myself wrote in 2021 a lot of letters to The Prosecutor General’s Office, to FSB, to deputies asking to forbid WHO in Russia. We are together then before the SMO with those who are now is for killing people the other way ( I use hints for I could be prosecuted). It's nothing, I mean this answer which is mentioned. Trust me. I'm inside for all my life and I'm reading all this stuff in original language.
I understood the first two sentences and the last two sentences. Nothing in-between is decipherable.
Those who were against vaxes and such were together until Feb.2022. After then most of the "antivax" movement in Russia decided that SMO is a way out of the agenda while it's just a part of it. All these resourses like Катюша etc. are for the war. For depopulation as the next act of the agenda's tragedy. They are the controlled opposition. They want people to be killed not with injections of poison but the common way: bombing, shooting etc. Citing these resources isn't a proper view of situation now. As for my hints, now I'm so brave to tell it more openly. I could be prosecuted for my opinion like in the stalin's times!!!! You couldn't understand what Russia is. For you it's like Central Africa for me. And English isn't my mother tongue. My language is Russian.
You wrote:
"Those who were against vaxes and such were together until Feb.2022. After then most of the "antivax" movement in Russia decided that SMO is a way out of the agenda while it's just a part of it."
It's the same in much of the West; dissidents of various stripes were starting to see that maybe the "East" isn't so good after all considering how eagerly they participated in the covid operation. But then the war came along and suddenly every one jumped back into their pre-covid camps of cheering for Russia, BRICS, the multipolar stuff etc. Very dumb and has made me lose a lot of interest and respect for many actors in "alternative media".
BRICS and the multi polar stuff is staving off the One World Government. So, for the moment at least, Russia is not part of the NWO but a stumbling block.
The SMO is necessary in order to protect the people of Donbass, Crimea and to prevent Sevastopol form being taken over by US & NATO.
Of those who claim as you, none can tell me what Putin should have done instead.
The SMO is being used by the Globalists to depopulate that is true, but that is not of Putin's doing. The West has turned a simple operation into a depopulation program by continually re-arming the dying army of Ukraine.
At this point even if Russia pulls out of Ukraine, the people of Donbass and Crimea will be sorted out by the SBU, Nazis & AFU and genocided. As they have already done in Kherson and other places after RU troops pulled back.
" BRICS and the multi polar stuff is staving off the One World Government. So, for the moment at least, Russia is not part of the NWO but a stumbling block. "
Are you sure ? BRICS is pushing for one common currency and an economic block of nations. The US is trying to create a North American Union, most likely with with another single currency. Eventually, the world will be divided in a few blocks. At some juncture world " peace " will be achieved, at which point, the UN will question the necessity of these blocks and corresponding currencies and propose they all be merged into one then the trap will be shut. Orwell's 1984 was not a work of fiction but a guide book.
I agree...what I mean is that there won't be a "one" world government as long as there are two blocks. I'm not saying that any of the blocks will be good.
Not everybody is controlled opposition. However, the propaganda pushers who were inside Russia like Soros affiliates and the CIA, along with western media and Hollywood/Entertainment-Complex have done their job, and many younger Russians who did NOT get suckered by the covid-scam, DID get suckered by the Anti-Russia scam and do not support the SMO.
I've met them. I've spoken to them. They don't understand who the Ruling Elite are or how they operate, fully. They don't even know or care that Donetsk region has been shelled most to every day of the week for 9 years.
You might be one of those!
It doesn't matter what the motive is when someone is trying to murder your family, you stop them with lethal force first and later worry about his motives.
I'm located in Russia, btw.
Good article, thanks for the share - I have wandered the globe since 1976 and always astonished at how pervasive American culture is, encountering it in the most surprising ways and in the most remote locations. Music, especially, cannabalized local traditions, I found, and it was rare to hear ethnic music unless at some kind of 'folk' event.
Any positive news as to the WHO, mandatory jabs, vax passports, public health "measures" for the safety of one and all ( about whom "they" care deeply, dontcha know ) ...... can only be believed once seen.
Safer that we be Skeptics, All.
Feel free to be optimistic. - but the PCR test ? Even Kerry Mullis is on video stating it is NOT intended, nor qualified, to be used as a diagnostic measure. Interesting to note that he 'passed away' not long before the whole covid debacle began, eh ?
It was never a virus, always nanotechnology poisoning. "PCR tests" are designed to instill nanotechnology, these "vaccines" are designed to inject nanotechnology, and "masks" are designed to inhale nanotechnology.
The question is who sticks with whom, and who wants to rip off whom
I don't get it. Please explain. What is the 'nanotechnology' threat? I have a vague idea it is somethng about putting 'nano' (i.e. very tiny) 'machines' or 'id tags' or such into all of us so's we can be tracked, monitored, constantly. That's the only idea I have. What do you say it is all about?
Please, read my posts on Substack, most of them deal with various issues related to nanotechnology.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/mrnas-are-nanoscale-machines-they
https://outraged.substack.com/p/tec-smart-mac-protocol-for-the-internet
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-and-the-new-arms-race
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-is-toxic
That's why they want everyone to adopt this nanotech poison - for biometrics, digital identification and transactions, but also for control, mind control, sterilization, killing and weakening people.
THIS IS UTOPIA. Nanotechnology is TOXIC and deadly.
But how to reach people and explain it to them?
"The PCR swab was also one of the vectors to inoculate people with nanotechnology."
Dr. Robert Young.
https://video.icic-net.com/w/tZtT3GAdcdiEwnsfDN93A9 at 16:21
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706753/ INHALATION EXPOSURE TO CARBON NANOTUBES (CNT) AND CARBON NANOFIBERS (CNF): METHODOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!) - PCR TEST!!!!
https://outraged.substack.com/p/thats-what-covid-is
http://web.archive.org/web/20101113233924/https://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=2546.php Russian military uses nanotechnology to build world's most powerful non-nuclear bomb (archive.org) Posted: September 11, 2007
https://outraged.substack.com/p/mrnas-are-nanoscale-machines-they
No. reason I wasn't testing! I did a spit test 1 time, to go back to work. But no nasal swab for me.
There's currently no evidence about e.g. advanced, self-assembling, mobile nanobots, as some claim. Unless e.g. mRNA itself and any manipulation at nanoscale is redeclared as nanotechnology.
There are however several studies confirming graphene sheets, tubes and filaments can cut up the endothelium (inner lining of the blood vessels), can lead to cell death, tumors and many other detrimental effects. (See many examples posted by Outraged Human here). Neurological applications with applied electromagnetic radiation are rudimentarily being researched. But they can't simply inject someone to turn them bio-synthetically trans-human, yet (as e.g. Karen Kingston's substack claims).
Of course I could be wrong and they've back-engineered some alien-tech, but I go with currently available evidence.
DARPA & Co. of course feel greatly flattered by many people believing they were geniuses in possession of advanced nanotechnology such as "black goo" and "morgellons" and synthetic biology, because it makes people fear them even more, but there is no evidence - darkfield microscopy and Raman spectroscopy alone won't cut it for me.
I'll now hide behind the couch, to avoid "...but, but, but I have Morgellons, you can't imagine the pain, you insensitive person", "I feel the nanobots in my brain", and "nanoscale=graphene= nanotech=QuintaColumna"-type comments.
I believe Karen Kingston, Marie Zeee, Quinta Columna & al are controlled opposition, because they have not brought conclusive evidence.
Just duckduck or google: "graphene masks" and you will see that all masks contain graphene. This is simply a crime, a murder
Go to La Quinta Columna where you will find their extensive research on the contents of all the vaccines (Sputnik included)
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=graphene+masks&mid=1346A91ACC531577B22D1346A91ACC531577B22D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M11g7EQPiuU&ab_channel=SkyNewsAustralia
Yes, of course. Most of my posts are on this subject
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studies
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects
The utility of Carbon nanotubes in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-014-0059-z The carcinogenic effect of various multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) after intraperitoneal injection in rats
http://www.n3cat.upc.edu/papers/carbon%20nanotubes%20and%20cancer.pdf Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/thats-what-covid-is
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/microchipped-and-marked-part-3
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
and so on
The toxicity and toxicity mechanisms of these nanomaterials have been known for a long time. They pretend to be idiots and make fools of us, while science says it is toxic and can potentially kill.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects
the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) face mask filters and respirator filters (https://www.graphene-info.com/israeli-researchers-develop-graphene-based-self-sterilizing-air-filter, https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/versatile-graphene-underlies-new-covid-zapping-air-filter/, https://medium.com/edge-of-innovation/how-safe-are-graphene-based-face-masks-b88740547e8c, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=38205)
the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) personal protective equipment
nanomaterial-based biosensors, including PCR tests (https://news.mit.edu/2021/carbon-nanotube-covid-detect-1026, https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676, https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/,https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892)
drugs and vaccines
https://outraged.substack.com/p/a-courious-case-of-covid-19-graphene
If you read this study on the toxicity of carbon / graphene-based materials, you will see that this is "Covid" and all the adverse effects after this injection....
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms
You don't need to be injected to get the nano - its in a lot of things now, and moving into the food chain. I don't know my status, tho no injection for me, I did get 4 rabies booster and IgG for rabies exposure in 2020. I was mighty scared to do so, but necessity of rabies exposure pushed me to it. I hear dental Lidocaine and some say insulin as well contained fibers. They dust the skies and coat the ground with such as well. I work on my bio energy field and EMF mitigation at home, and at work too. I am trying to drink filtered water Alexpure style, and maybe create structured water to try out. EDTA cream and working on the EDTA IV.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-conspiracy
https://dailycoin.com/nano-nano-could-lead-mastercards-crypto-development/
They need these graphene nodes in every arm for transactions for CBDC and... they are TOXIC
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/nanotechnology-blockchain-covid-19-immunity-passports/
US firm combines nanotechnology, blockchain for COVID-19 immunity passports
April 15, 2020
U.S.-based quantum dot producer Quantum Materials Corp (QMC) announced its blockchain-based QDX HealthID for transparency in disease testing and immunization for infectious diseases. The goal is to ensure the authenticity of health data and support individuals to re-join the workforce quickly.
Quantum dots are nanoparticles made up of semiconductor materials that emit different colors when illuminated by light. This color depends on their size and the way they were manufactured. QMC has developed a track and trace solution using quantum dots and blockchain to verify the origin of products and counterfeiting.
The authentication solution is combined with QDX HealthID for monitoring and tracking the outbreaks of diseases, such as the COVID-19. The solution authenticates individuals being tested, the persons administering the test, and the test kits. Update: the COVID-19 solution uses the same authentication, but at this stage does not use quantum dots on packaging.
In simpler terms, QDX HealthID ensures that testing data is secure and not tampered with. Currently, health reports and medical certificates are being issued on paper, which makes them easy to forge.
“Not only does this service facilitate improved health outcomes for patients, but it also underpins back-to-work certifications, sometimes referred to as immunization passports,” said Stephen B. Squires, President & CEO of QMC.
With the health data backed by blockchain, governments and health agencies can formulate new plans and safety measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 and other diseases. Additionally, individual users can assess their immunization passport using a mobile application. The app features color-coded indicators — green, yellow, and red. If the app shows the green indicator, the individual has clearance to interact in social and work environments. This indicator can be shared and authenticated by others using a QR code.
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/nanotechnology-blockchain-covid-19-immunity-passports/
http://web.archive.org/web/20200804115842/https://www.sqnewmaterials.com/biomass-graphene-disposable-medical-face-mask/57701908.html
https://www.country94.ca/2021/04/04/graphene-containing-masks-recalled/
Nanoparticles could also reach the lungs if nanoparticles are not firmly embedded in the face mask material. Acute effects in humans arising from inhalation of silver nanoparticles include lung failure, increased heart rate and decreased arterial blood oxygen pressure.”
“Passage of inhaled nanoparticles into the bloodstream was demonstrated in one human study (Nemmar et al 2002), but two other similar studies have failed to show such a translocation. Another potential route of translocation of inhaled nanoparticles is the olfactory nerve in the nose leading to the olfactory bulb of the brain. 13C nanoparticles with a size about 35 nm were detected in the brain olfactory bulb after inhalation exposure.
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0120-1 Biodistribution and toxicity of radio-labeled few layer graphene in mice after intratracheal instillation
When considering the potential human health risks of nanoparticles, inhalation is thought to be the exposure route of highest concern. The calculated deposition fraction of few layer graphene (FLG) with different lateral dimensions ranging from 0.001 to 100 μm in the nasopharyngeal, tracheobronchial, and alveolar regions revealed that there would be substantial deposition of these nanoplatelets throughout the respiratory tract. Findings from several recent studies indicate that graphene and graphene oxide (GO) may induce the acute inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis in mice lungs.
Considering the wide distribution range of graphene sizes in our study, a fraction of graphene likely passed the air-blood barrier and was translocated to liver and spleen. Li et al applied 125I labeled GO to study its distribution in Kunming mice by intratracheal instillation and found that the radioactivity was detected in blood and organs, including liver, spleen and thyroid gland
Nanoparticles may translocate to extrapulmonary organs and may be redistributed to other tissues after deposition in the lung.
Thus, knowledge of graphene biodistribution in mice after inhalation remains a key research gap. FLG may pass through the air-blood barrier into blood and then be delivered to liver and spleen, or enter into the blood via adsorption through the gastrointestinal tract.
https://www.grapheneuses.org/graphene-sensor/ Graphene Sensor Can Detect COVID-19 in 60 Seconds - Graphene Uses
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/ GLC-GLCM develops graphene-enhanced sensor for rapid Covid-19 test
https://phys.org/news/2020-08-graphene-oxide-based-rapid-infections.html Researchers develop a graphene oxide-based rapid test to detect infections
IN CASE YOU EVER WONDER WHY IT'S INSERTED CLOSE TO YOUR BRAIN AND NOT CLOSE TO YOUR LUNGS:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879 Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
After 24 h, besides being present in the olfactory bulbs, trace quantities of us-GO translocated to more distant structures, such as the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, midbrain, cerebellum, and the pons and medulla.
In this previous study, splenic macrophages sequestered GO sheets and mediated their structural degradation over a 9-month period.
In conclusion, our results suggest that following the intranasal administration of aqueously dispersed GO sheets, the materials underwent size-dependent translocation to the brain. The smallest sheet size category (us-GO, 10–550 nm) experienced the greatest translocation and was present in every examined brain region, notably in the olfactory bulb.
Yes. It is all correct. I mean in the general sense: I cannot speak on Russian matters themselves, but the medical stuff. Regarding Covid and PCR etc.
It could have been more clear and stark.
The ignorant need clear stark easy to remember memes, slogans.
And directions: URLs and such. Names. Organisations.
So the FLCCC could have been mentioned perhaps linked to. And Dr Pierre Kory from there.
I will do it: https://covid19criticalcare.com/
And we need a 'slogan' or catch phrase to spell out the inadequacy of PCR for the use it is put to.
Perhaps something after the nature of:
"PCR can find a molecule. Not an Illness."
Perhaps something illustrative after the style of "We/it can find calcium in you - that doesn't mean you've got gallstones'. I don't know. I have no talent for it. But there's millions of professional copywriters, advertising men and whatnot that should be able to come up with the right copy.
In fact the situation is even worse than that suggests. For in context they actually can make the machine do sufficient cycles that it will always find what they are looking for which they then improperly present as the discovery of an illness.
One basic problem is the incredible ignorance of the general public - and that extends all the way into the medical profession, for most nurses, nurse's aids, health care workers etc. etc are actually merely 'general public' as regards their wit, acumen, intellectual curiosity.
And a second is the fear of losing one's income. It turns out quite surprisingly to me that the whole workforce is terrified of losing its job whatever it may be. From that masked receptionist at the front counter of the private lab, or chemist shop, or doctor's surgery, to the doctor himself.
Fact. The whole Australian doctoral profession was robbed of its right to practice medicine according to the doctors own good conscience and even the right to speak - they were forbidden to comment on Ivermectin for instance. And I spoke to several of them in the confines of their surgeries.
Where they were sitting before me wearing a mask. No me. They. They were wearing a mask. They scientifically knew the mask was pointless. A plethora of studies showing it. Mere common sense and 'manufacturers recommendations' if you like: any 'masking' is never a 'thing' it is always a process and all steps of the process must be carried out for it to reach maximal effectiveness or claimed effectiveness. And so on. And the well known surgeon's studies in England that showed no increase of infection post surgery when surgeons operated without masks: so they gave them up.
Aware of all this and with regulations relaxed so that I did not have to wear a mask this still sat there before me claiming they 'could not' take it off.
And they told me their reason for complying was that they would be 'in trouble' if they didn't. That's a euphemism for their licences in jeopardy, of course.
Yep.
It is a big deal. And (Western) world wide. More sensible and human places in the world employed ivermectin and got vitamin D and melatonin from being out in the open in the sun - while our totally insane and cowed doctors were telling us to lock ourselves in at home out of the light, forbidden to go out! Etc. But you know.
Yep I know what you mean. Your experience is paralleled in my own life and for sure many, many others.
I don't much like this fashion for blaming it on 'cognitive dissonance' though as though they've found the cause and it is a new thing, a sudden appearance of a contemporary evil arisen in the context of our new evil governments and big businesses and their deliberate misleading of us.
In fact 'cognitive dissonance' is simply the normal process of perceiving a mismatch between expectations or understandings and reality. It is not an evil, it is a good.
If you didn't experience some kind of psychological 'force' when you ran across new information that contradicts your current beliefs you couldn't learn anything new.
So you go down this street believing it leads to the shop and when you get there: no shop.
A feeling of discomfort, perhaps even alarm, mild shock: 'cognitive dissonance'.
This causes you to modify your beliefs.
All good.
The fashion today in some circles in this hysterical age is to try to ban 'cognitive dissonance' !
Which is fairly ludicrous. But it is a ludicrous age.
Of course when we get into beliefs a bit more significant and deeper than simply which street leads to the shop - like beliefs about which science and practitioners of it holds truth and reason and can be relied or - or which societal institutions are good and benevolent and can be relied upon - the clear truth is not as quickly and clearly manifested to us as the absence of a shop on the road is.
So it requires time to process. Much more time. And really: the better the person the longer the time.
The more astute the person the more they will want to consider ramifications at the ongoing end and causations at the ingoing.
And there is a thing comes into play in such 'readjustments' that doesn't in crude realities such as the presence or absence of a shop.
And that 'thing' is value judgements. They become very important. All important.
So we can see this when we consider our own. Our children.
I can be convinced for years that my child is a good child. Though friends and siblings and relatives and school reports and perhaps even incidents with the authorities seem to indicate otherwise.
I may never change my mind. Though I may reluctantly modify my behaviour in many respects. We've all heard of the parents who have to hide valuables and bank accounts and credit cards from drug addicted children is perhaps an instance.
But I may go to the wall in the end for that child because my belief in the child's essential 'good' quality is kinda inextricably bound up with my estimation of my own 'good' quality.
So like what I'm saying is something after the style of 'a word to the wise' is enough.
If 'they' seek to convince me, to demonstrate to me, that I've been holding wrong beliefs about something of rather deep and fundamental importance they should credit me with the intelligence to intake their information and give me time to assess it and put it in context and consider the whole thing. Have some respect for me and some 'tenderness', so to speak, some sympathy with my travail: that I have to come to terms with the idea that my son John is an inveterate scoundrel.
And conversely I must do the same to and for them.
If you see what I mean. :)
Yes. I see we cannot continue our conversation. You seek to go ad hominem and ascribe me attitudes without cause or need.
Anything, quite clearly, can be an object of fashion or subject of blame according to the vagaries of fashion and irrationality of the populace.
Good and bad are subjective values not existing in themselves but always in context. Given that fact anything can be ascribed a value of relative 'goodness' or 'badness' and even both at the same time.
Hence gravity is good because simply because without it our animal world could not exist and it's natural for us to assume that our very existence is a 'good'.
In the same way I have argued that cognitive dissonance is good.
And I am correct.
If you do not care to take the information in then so be it. That's your cognitive dissonance not being put to the good use I pointed out nature intends it for.
the end of germ theory...https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8
I notice you didn't debunk any of the evidence he provided...maybe try reading some books on the subject since you don't like documentaries....https://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mania-COVID-19-Hepatitis-Billion-Dollar/dp/3752629789
cant say that I have...but my memory aint what it used to be
Well, Riley, this sounds a bit like grasping at straws, trying to find something good. But we still appreciate the analysis.
I hadn't seen that quote from the Russian deputy finance minister Timur Maksimov before (one can also wonder why a finance minister has opinions on vaccines but I digress...). Very interesting as that is in line with what arch-globalists in the "West" said:
Merkel
"Germany and other wealthy countries may need to give some of their own stock of vaccines to developing countries in addition to money, since only vaccinating the whole world will end the coronavirus pandemic, Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday.
...
But she told journalists: “I stressed in my intervention that the pandemic is not over until all people in the world have been vaccinated.”"
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-politics-g7-merkel-idUSKBN2AJ1WG
Macron (translated from French)
"We will get out of this crisis by vaccinating France, by vaccinating the world. Because the virus knows no borders. To help all countries in this race, 1 billion doses have been delivered with Covax. Vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. With solidarity. We continue."
https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/1482453432908845057
Boris Johnson
"British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will use the Group of Seven wealthy democracies’ summit next week to urge world leaders to commit to vaccinating the global population by the end of 2022.
...
“The world is looking to us to rise to the greatest challenge of the postwar era: defeating COVID and leading a global recovery driven by our shared values,” he says in a statement. “Vaccinating the world by the end of next year would be the single greatest feat in medical history.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/uk-urges-global-commitment-to-vaccinate-the-world-by-end-of-2022/
But also with what what the (now former) Chinese equivalent of the CDC director said:
"Gao noted that with the SARS-CoV-2 it is required a vaccination rate of at least 85 percent to build herd immunity, not to mention that there are breakthrough infections.
"What is more important is that it does not depend on how many people in China get vaccinated, but how many people globally get vaccinated, to build real herd immunity which is global rather than in a specific country," Gao noted."
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1241050.shtml
And Xi Jinping
"Countries need to strengthen international cooperation against COVID-19, carry out active cooperation on research and development of medicines, jointly build multiple lines of defense against the coronavirus, and speed up efforts to build a global community of health for all. Of particular importance is to fully leverage vaccines as a powerful weapon, ensure their equitable distribution, quicken vaccination and close the global immunization gap, so as to truly safeguard people's lives, health and livelihoods."
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/address-chinese-president-xi-jinping-2022-world-economic-forum-virtual-session/
The phrasing may be a little different but the overall message is the same: everyone (more or less) needed to get vaccinated against "covid". This would suggest that they're taking orders from the same central hub, wouldn't it?
Citizens should be Vaccinated to Regain Their Rights!
• We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services. Henry Kissinger, WHO 2009
Kissinger Quote from a speech to the WHO Council on Eugenics, February 25, 2009:
"Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it's game over. They will accept anything - forcible blood or organ donation - "for the greater good". We can genetically modify children and sterilize them --- "for the greater good". Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions. And many of you in this room are investors. It's a big win-win. We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services"
After having scrupulously followed the globalist agenda in the last 3 years, not just in "health" matters, but also in all "green" and "digital" matters, this announcement is remindful of a great American patriot (https://www.israelnationalnews.com/static/pictures/781x439/926868.jpg) announcing the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO. But let's be optimistic and hope that tomorrow Putin will also announce the nationalization of the Bank of Russia.
Just because Russian lawmakers and media seem to have forgotten(?) about the biolabs and are instead copying bad health protocols from the West, it doesn't mean we should gloss over those man-made biological threats too. Yes, it is not possible to create a manmade plague that only kills Russians, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't take it seriously when they're working on such diseases and collecting genetic materials from Russians.
We should probably remind Russians, at least those who're not paid by the IMF, of their own allegations. If a plague against Russians doesn't work (it won't) and the work continues, the result would make Ukrainians sick first, if we're talking about labs in that country. We know from such incidents in Georgia where similar labs exist and residents got sick (anecdotal evidence). Needless to say, we don't know that because of imported PCR tests, but because of good journalists. So it's unclear if those are rare incidents or if more people are affected by whatever comes out of those labs. How would we ever get a full picture if no investigations are launched? Or if those who'd be told to find out just buy more PCR tests instead of actually sending doctors to talk with residents to check if they get sick in an unusual way or unusually often.
To make things even more complicated: All of that was about leaks, but what if they're experimenting with their so-called "self-spreading vaccines" they've been talking about for years? Manmade things that are then released on purpose, for example with mosquitoes? It's more than likely that they'll do most of that work in those leaky labs overseas to avoid accidentally killing themselves. And the mere use of the word "vaccine" causes gullible people to accept and defend this thing (the same people who were hiding at home being afraid of another spreading thing).
Sorry if this was off-topic, but I can't get this phenomenon out of my head.
Interesting article. ....Also, Yandex’s nifty Image Translator is a gem of a find!
The WHO reminds me of the old Tiajuana or Mexican border town abortion clinics back in the 50s and 60s , when they used coat hangers as instruments. No offense but the truth is not pretty sometimes. And either is what the WHO has in store for us.
PCR tests are very useful in a plethora of ways, unfortunately they can also be used for unsavory purposes. But the technology is at least very cheap to produce and if allowed citizens can use them on their own in quantity that makes the false positive scams impossible.
You touched on PCR - I just put out an article on this matter.
https://open.substack.com/pub/klim/p/making-a-pandemic?r=1iemnw&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Excellent. But, what caught my attention was the statement that the CPRF has been vocally opposed to the Covid measures. Yes, QR codes, and the like. BUT they have NOT challenged the narrative forthrightly. There IS no novel "virus" abroad. That's the core of the matter, imho. "Unprepared", etc., just doesn't get it. We're living a giant HOAX - and a deadly one - the vax is a killer.