63 Comments

Maybe, an investigatigation was already undertaken and completed in 2020 when

three "frontline" health care workers mysteriously fell out of hospital windows in Russia within a two week period of time.

At the early stages of the scamdemic there seemed to be a slew of deaths targeting individuals who might be considered a thorn in the side by the psychos determined to implement a bunch of irrational protocols including injecting populations with an experimental toxin.

That being said, Kary Mullis the inventor of PCR technology died a month prior to "Event 201" a Pandemic Exercise involving Gates, WEF, and John Hopkins University.

Then there's the odd death of Brandy Vaughn a popular activist who questioned the safety of childhood vaccines. And how about the four african leaders who weren't thrilled with mRNA technology.

There's no doubt that everything about the scamdemic was synchronized and Russia's good friend China was leading the pack in the worldwide terror campaign.

So although China, Russia, and the US seem to be at odds it's remarkable how they're always in agreement about establishing an authoritarian biosecurity surveillance state.

Expand full comment
Jun 10, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat

I'm Russian who lives in Russia. I myself wrote in 2021 a lot of letters to The Prosecutor General’s Office, to FSB, to deputies asking to forbid WHO in Russia. We are together then before the SMO with those who are now is for killing people the other way ( I use hints for I could be prosecuted). It's nothing, I mean this answer which is mentioned. Trust me. I'm inside for all my life and I'm reading all this stuff in original language.

Expand full comment

Any positive news as to the WHO, mandatory jabs, vax passports, public health "measures" for the safety of one and all ( about whom "they" care deeply, dontcha know ) ...... can only be believed once seen.

Safer that we be Skeptics, All.

Feel free to be optimistic. - but the PCR test ? Even Kerry Mullis is on video stating it is NOT intended, nor qualified, to be used as a diagnostic measure. Interesting to note that he 'passed away' not long before the whole covid debacle began, eh ?

Expand full comment

It was never a virus, always nanotechnology poisoning. "PCR tests" are designed to instill nanotechnology, these "vaccines" are designed to inject nanotechnology, and "masks" are designed to inhale nanotechnology.

The question is who sticks with whom, and who wants to rip off whom

Expand full comment

Yes. It is all correct. I mean in the general sense: I cannot speak on Russian matters themselves, but the medical stuff. Regarding Covid and PCR etc.

It could have been more clear and stark.

The ignorant need clear stark easy to remember memes, slogans.

And directions: URLs and such. Names. Organisations.

So the FLCCC could have been mentioned perhaps linked to. And Dr Pierre Kory from there.

I will do it: https://covid19criticalcare.com/

And we need a 'slogan' or catch phrase to spell out the inadequacy of PCR for the use it is put to.

Perhaps something after the nature of:

"PCR can find a molecule. Not an Illness."

Perhaps something illustrative after the style of "We/it can find calcium in you - that doesn't mean you've got gallstones'. I don't know. I have no talent for it. But there's millions of professional copywriters, advertising men and whatnot that should be able to come up with the right copy.

In fact the situation is even worse than that suggests. For in context they actually can make the machine do sufficient cycles that it will always find what they are looking for which they then improperly present as the discovery of an illness.

One basic problem is the incredible ignorance of the general public - and that extends all the way into the medical profession, for most nurses, nurse's aids, health care workers etc. etc are actually merely 'general public' as regards their wit, acumen, intellectual curiosity.

And a second is the fear of losing one's income. It turns out quite surprisingly to me that the whole workforce is terrified of losing its job whatever it may be. From that masked receptionist at the front counter of the private lab, or chemist shop, or doctor's surgery, to the doctor himself.

Fact. The whole Australian doctoral profession was robbed of its right to practice medicine according to the doctors own good conscience and even the right to speak - they were forbidden to comment on Ivermectin for instance. And I spoke to several of them in the confines of their surgeries.

Where they were sitting before me wearing a mask. No me. They. They were wearing a mask. They scientifically knew the mask was pointless. A plethora of studies showing it. Mere common sense and 'manufacturers recommendations' if you like: any 'masking' is never a 'thing' it is always a process and all steps of the process must be carried out for it to reach maximal effectiveness or claimed effectiveness. And so on. And the well known surgeon's studies in England that showed no increase of infection post surgery when surgeons operated without masks: so they gave them up.

Aware of all this and with regulations relaxed so that I did not have to wear a mask this still sat there before me claiming they 'could not' take it off.

And they told me their reason for complying was that they would be 'in trouble' if they didn't. That's a euphemism for their licences in jeopardy, of course.

Yep.

It is a big deal. And (Western) world wide. More sensible and human places in the world employed ivermectin and got vitamin D and melatonin from being out in the open in the sun - while our totally insane and cowed doctors were telling us to lock ourselves in at home out of the light, forbidden to go out! Etc. But you know.

Expand full comment

Well, Riley, this sounds a bit like grasping at straws, trying to find something good. But we still appreciate the analysis.

Expand full comment

I hadn't seen that quote from the Russian deputy finance minister Timur Maksimov before (one can also wonder why a finance minister has opinions on vaccines but I digress...). Very interesting as that is in line with what arch-globalists in the "West" said:

Merkel

"Germany and other wealthy countries may need to give some of their own stock of vaccines to developing countries in addition to money, since only vaccinating the whole world will end the coronavirus pandemic, Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday.

...

But she told journalists: “I stressed in my intervention that the pandemic is not over until all people in the world have been vaccinated.”"

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-politics-g7-merkel-idUSKBN2AJ1WG

Macron (translated from French)

"We will get out of this crisis by vaccinating France, by vaccinating the world. Because the virus knows no borders. To help all countries in this race, 1 billion doses have been delivered with Covax. Vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. With solidarity. We continue."

https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/1482453432908845057

Boris Johnson

"British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will use the Group of Seven wealthy democracies’ summit next week to urge world leaders to commit to vaccinating the global population by the end of 2022.

...

“The world is looking to us to rise to the greatest challenge of the postwar era: defeating COVID and leading a global recovery driven by our shared values,” he says in a statement. “Vaccinating the world by the end of next year would be the single greatest feat in medical history.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/uk-urges-global-commitment-to-vaccinate-the-world-by-end-of-2022/

But also with what what the (now former) Chinese equivalent of the CDC director said:

"Gao noted that with the SARS-CoV-2 it is required a vaccination rate of at least 85 percent to build herd immunity, not to mention that there are breakthrough infections.

"What is more important is that it does not depend on how many people in China get vaccinated, but how many people globally get vaccinated, to build real herd immunity which is global rather than in a specific country," Gao noted."

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1241050.shtml

And Xi Jinping

"Countries need to strengthen international cooperation against COVID-19, carry out active cooperation on research and development of medicines, jointly build multiple lines of defense against the coronavirus, and speed up efforts to build a global community of health for all. Of particular importance is to fully leverage vaccines as a powerful weapon, ensure their equitable distribution, quicken vaccination and close the global immunization gap, so as to truly safeguard people's lives, health and livelihoods."

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/address-chinese-president-xi-jinping-2022-world-economic-forum-virtual-session/

The phrasing may be a little different but the overall message is the same: everyone (more or less) needed to get vaccinated against "covid". This would suggest that they're taking orders from the same central hub, wouldn't it?

Expand full comment

Citizens should be Vaccinated to Regain Their Rights!

• We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services. Henry Kissinger, WHO 2009

Kissinger Quote from a speech to the WHO Council on Eugenics, February 25, 2009:

"Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it's game over. They will accept anything - forcible blood or organ donation - "for the greater good". We can genetically modify children and sterilize them --- "for the greater good". Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions. And many of you in this room are investors. It's a big win-win. We thin out the herd and the herd pays us for extermination services"

Expand full comment

After having scrupulously followed the globalist agenda in the last 3 years, not just in "health" matters, but also in all "green" and "digital" matters, this announcement is remindful of a great American patriot (https://www.israelnationalnews.com/static/pictures/781x439/926868.jpg) announcing the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO. But let's be optimistic and hope that tomorrow Putin will also announce the nationalization of the Bank of Russia.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2023·edited Jun 9, 2023

Just because Russian lawmakers and media seem to have forgotten(?) about the biolabs and are instead copying bad health protocols from the West, it doesn't mean we should gloss over those man-made biological threats too. Yes, it is not possible to create a manmade plague that only kills Russians, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't take it seriously when they're working on such diseases and collecting genetic materials from Russians.

We should probably remind Russians, at least those who're not paid by the IMF, of their own allegations. If a plague against Russians doesn't work (it won't) and the work continues, the result would make Ukrainians sick first, if we're talking about labs in that country. We know from such incidents in Georgia where similar labs exist and residents got sick (anecdotal evidence). Needless to say, we don't know that because of imported PCR tests, but because of good journalists. So it's unclear if those are rare incidents or if more people are affected by whatever comes out of those labs. How would we ever get a full picture if no investigations are launched? Or if those who'd be told to find out just buy more PCR tests instead of actually sending doctors to talk with residents to check if they get sick in an unusual way or unusually often.

To make things even more complicated: All of that was about leaks, but what if they're experimenting with their so-called "self-spreading vaccines" they've been talking about for years? Manmade things that are then released on purpose, for example with mosquitoes? It's more than likely that they'll do most of that work in those leaky labs overseas to avoid accidentally killing themselves. And the mere use of the word "vaccine" causes gullible people to accept and defend this thing (the same people who were hiding at home being afraid of another spreading thing).

Sorry if this was off-topic, but I can't get this phenomenon out of my head.

Expand full comment

Interesting article. ....Also, Yandex’s nifty Image Translator is a gem of a find!

Expand full comment

The WHO reminds me of the old Tiajuana or Mexican border town abortion clinics back in the 50s and 60s , when they used coat hangers as instruments. No offense but the truth is not pretty sometimes. And either is what the WHO has in store for us.

Expand full comment

PCR tests are very useful in a plethora of ways, unfortunately they can also be used for unsavory purposes. But the technology is at least very cheap to produce and if allowed citizens can use them on their own in quantity that makes the false positive scams impossible.

Expand full comment

You touched on PCR - I just put out an article on this matter.

https://open.substack.com/pub/klim/p/making-a-pandemic?r=1iemnw&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Excellent. But, what caught my attention was the statement that the CPRF has been vocally opposed to the Covid measures. Yes, QR codes, and the like. BUT they have NOT challenged the narrative forthrightly. There IS no novel "virus" abroad. That's the core of the matter, imho. "Unprepared", etc., just doesn't get it. We're living a giant HOAX - and a deadly one - the vax is a killer.

Expand full comment