Jan 22, 2023·edited Jan 22, 2023Liked by Edward Slavsquat
Well, there are oligarchs and there are oligarchs. At least Western oligarchs stand for something. Just think of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, even Elon Musk and countless others - they stand for "New Lizard World Order". And what do Russian (for this matter Ukrainian too) oligarchs stand for? My yacht is longer than yours? Ironically I'd probably prefer the latter types of oligarchs, since I do like to see them simple and stupid, coin operated, and not the conniving smart SoBs with tons of money as we have here.
The divide and conquer working so well that everyone in society is forced to take sides in these wars and conflicts nowadays, otherwise they are a fifth column traitor. That’s the worst part of this whole scam.
Hi Riley, If you haven´t come across this formidable lady Sasha Latypova you must look at her work. Like you, she is a meticulous researcher leaving no stone unturned.
Yes in Russia there you have strong conservative currents in society. Together with etatism and moderate libertarism/ traditional liberalism. Eurioasianism prevents against islamism and white suprematism.
If they start mass-importing invaders like the Western nations then they will have issues with "muh White premacy!" It's just a propaganda term to slander people who are sick of being replaced by the Jews.
Probably this is just the way our horde- mind works. We too can use it by convincing people us 99% is one horde and the oligarchs are our enemy. And it's true btw.
"All the famous space lizards were in attendance, except for the Russian ones"
Another exception was made for the Iranians, while a colour revolution is running in their country to instigate a regime change. The oligarchs have decided that it was now time to institutionalize sodomy in Muslim countries. To that purpose, a Farsi speaking propaganda channel was put in place in 2017, Iran International, funded by Saudi money and focused on "Human and LGBT" rights.
"Their oligarchs are better than our oligarchs," say the Western bloggers, all caught up in a Putin trance. Thanks again, Riley, "It's a strange, strange world we live in, master Jack."
And if content creators and media consumers would then even discover and dig into still rarely known and quite influential oligarchal organizations like the Council for National Policy,based in Washington D.C.,a powerhub for the right,conservative side of the power structure in the US and their influence over the republican party,Fox News but also many "alternative" media content creators,conservative activist groups and big evangelical churches, or La Cercle and even less known power hub for mostly rightwing continental and anglo-american politicians,businessmen or also intelligence assets etc. then many people would also receive a much more complete picture of the power structure and that a lot of the conservative opposition in the west has been widely subverted by elite interests..Council for National Policy..Funded in 1981 by the former evangelical preacher Tim Lahey and originally financed by Nelson Bunker Hunt,Nelson Rockefeller,the Unification Church aka Moon sect,the Coke and Coors,Regnery Family,among others. Members of the CNP were involved in the Iran-Contra affair,funding of Al-Quaida,and the PNAC document..Every republican presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan spoke in front of CNP members before getting nominated as candidate on the republican convention. Every head of the CNP with one exception was also member of the Knights of Malta. The CNP doesn't publish membership lists itself but lists were leaked and the CNP didn't deny the authenticity of the lists. To name a few famous former or current members of the CNP now..Mike Pence,Rudy Giuliani,Mike Pompeo,John Bolton,Steve Bannon.Michael Flynn,Erik Prince,Peter Thiel,Kenneth Blackwell,Betsy Devos,Tom Fitton(Judicial Watch),Oliver North(iran-Contra affair),Paul Craig Roberts,Richard deVos,Joseph Coors,Pierre du Pont,Jerry Falwell,Edwin Feulner(Heritage Foundation),Foster Friess(financed Turning Point USA with Charlie Kirk),Jesse Helms,Nelson Bunker Hunt,Herbert William Hunt,Jack Kamp,Tim Lahey,Larry McDonald(also John Birch Society),Edwin Meese the third,Charles Missler,Grover Norquist,Larry Pratt,Pat Robertson,Phyllis Schlafly,General John Singlaub(Iran-Contra affair,Cleon Skousen(Mormon mafia),Edward Teller(inventor of the neutron bomb),Richard Viguerie,Paul Weyrich etc...Here an introduction into the Council for National Policy..https://odysee.com/$/playlist/25243a889377da7f090077f599968d74241a063c. And here an introduction into "La Cercle". https://isgp-studies.com/le-cercle-pinay
Three solutions possible. Two are based on national sovereignty. One is globalist. Strong, direct by the people elected President or Chancellor. Popular votes. Weak or no parties. Members of parliament direct voted by the people.(When there is a parliament). Jugdes voted by the people or a random number generator. Militia courts. Civil society. National sovereignist. Than: Nationalsyndikalist Leadership and council. National sovereignist. Than: Fighting Spiritual. Kiborg inside of the Kiborg.Total totalitarianism. Total imperial Empire. Total connection/ annexation from all and total absorption from all and all and all dimensions. Mother Machine. All and all are and is connected. From eternity to eternity until all eternity, no outside anymore. Eternal pray, eternal meditation. Unremitting total Eucharist. All what will be produced is inside of the machine and all is in the machine. Ressources flowing in the machine. All over is centre. When there is a lot of ressources, people can choose, but not trade. That what is scarce will be gathered and allocated in the random number generator( for example dwellings,cells, combs). A kind of globalism.
"The West will use CBDCs to usher in a totalitarian dystopia, while the digital ruble will be completely voluntary to use."
I'd be trading stocks and shares if I got a penny for every time someone justified an act of evil by suggesting the action was voluntary.
Trump shills would insist Operation Warp Speed wasn't evil because the poison shots were "voluntary" (ignore the fact it enabled the vaccine tyrants to begin with). Ignore the fact the "voluntary" effort was sustained by an absolute campaign of lies, deception, and fabricated evidence of "safe and effective" and "do it for grandma" and other nonsense.
Trudeau shills would insist forced euthanasia was acceptable because it was 'voluntary', ignore the fact they withheld healthcare from the sick and vulnerable, drove people into bankruptcy by seizing their funds and assets, and obliterated all sense of self-worth they had in the process.
Child murder shills would insist child murder is voluntary, a 'choice' to be made by the mother. Ignore the absolute darkness and apathy of moral spirit that must exist to offer such services in the first place.
Now I have to deal with the likes of Roper arguing 'voluntarism' for the centralised digital currencies. Tell me, would Roper accept death camps killing people if the entry was entirely voluntary? Offering lethal drugs to children? Hitman services are voluntary, does he endorse those?
I can recognize what Röper says as things I believed, or at least realistically (or so I thought) could hope to be true, as late as two years ago – about the supposedly politically leashed Russian oligarchs, even about the Russian vaccine with the cringe name, I’m embarrassed to say. (I hadn’t even heard of CBDCs back then, the good old days of the dystopian hellscape.)
Kind of like finding that old polyester leisure suit in the closet, it’s something I can only confess to among friends.
May I inform the trusty souls who still believe in the goodness of "socially responsible enterpreneurs" from the Russian Federation that good ole' Klaus ran into some financial difficulties when he had to pretend that "the Russians are excluded from WEF", to the tune of 6-7 million, for it became known that 70% of his budget had come from those very "enterpreneurs"? The lying propagandists on the payroll have always known that, and still do, I suspect.
Good exposition, with which I certainly don't have any fundamental disagreement. Nevertheless, Putin came to power at the end of the turbulent 90s promising to LIMIT the power of the oligarchs, which up until that point had been practically absolute (Berezovsky, for example, clearly wielded a great deal more real power than the enfeebled Yeltsin at that point). Putin's pitch was, and remains, that he would be the ultimate arbiter of the inevitable squabbles (i.e. gang warfare) between ascending oligarchs. It doesn't often happen that he squashes a recalcitrant oligarch, but when he does, it is usually decisive. As someone who has been living in Russia for the last eight years, I think that this really is a major difference to the liberal west, where genuinely sovereign leaders are rarer than hen's teeth. The political culture is different too: most Russians genuinely couldn't care less about politics, since in any case, if there is a problem, it is up to Putin to fix it. For example, in my home city of Ekaterinburg, there was a stooshie when a local oligarch wanted to build a church in a popular city centre park. The local youth actually went out and protested, which is a very rare occurrence. The OMON were sent in, but within days Putin signalled that the church could very well be built elsewhere and that was the end of it. In the liberal west, on the other hand, everyone is frantically virtue-signalling their adherence to some or other absurd political posture, which makes zero difference to anyone's actual lives, which are entirely governed in the interests of the capital-owning classes.
Well, there are oligarchs and there are oligarchs. At least Western oligarchs stand for something. Just think of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, even Elon Musk and countless others - they stand for "New Lizard World Order". And what do Russian (for this matter Ukrainian too) oligarchs stand for? My yacht is longer than yours? Ironically I'd probably prefer the latter types of oligarchs, since I do like to see them simple and stupid, coin operated, and not the conniving smart SoBs with tons of money as we have here.
All of them destroy humanity and deserve death.
But still morons call Russia based and trad yo...
The divide and conquer working so well that everyone in society is forced to take sides in these wars and conflicts nowadays, otherwise they are a fifth column traitor. That’s the worst part of this whole scam.
There were conflicts are there is a fight. The analysis of Edward leads us to more war, to radical and total war, radicaler and totaler
True, the focus should not be on the form…
https://anderdaa7.substack.com/p/does-absolute-power-corrupt
Hi Riley, If you haven´t come across this formidable lady Sasha Latypova you must look at her work. Like you, she is a meticulous researcher leaving no stone unturned.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/terminal-incompetence-or-fraud?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
thanks will check it out
Wake me up when Russia starts transitioning 4 year-olds. There is still hope.
Yes in Russia there you have strong conservative currents in society. Together with etatism and moderate libertarism/ traditional liberalism. Eurioasianism prevents against islamism and white suprematism.
What is Eurioasusnism?
If they start mass-importing invaders like the Western nations then they will have issues with "muh White premacy!" It's just a propaganda term to slander people who are sick of being replaced by the Jews.
Euroasianism. Dugins philosophy
Thanks for clearing that up.
Is is so easy to fall for the good vs evil narrative - and that is just as true for the alt media.
Probably this is just the way our horde- mind works. We too can use it by convincing people us 99% is one horde and the oligarchs are our enemy. And it's true btw.
The superstructure can only be damaged by war. War is not the problem, to less war is the problem.
"All the famous space lizards were in attendance, except for the Russian ones"
Another exception was made for the Iranians, while a colour revolution is running in their country to instigate a regime change. The oligarchs have decided that it was now time to institutionalize sodomy in Muslim countries. To that purpose, a Farsi speaking propaganda channel was put in place in 2017, Iran International, funded by Saudi money and focused on "Human and LGBT" rights.
Haha this guy on Ehret...
https://nevermoremedia.substack.com/p/patriots-or-traitors-a-critical-look
"Their oligarchs are better than our oligarchs," say the Western bloggers, all caught up in a Putin trance. Thanks again, Riley, "It's a strange, strange world we live in, master Jack."
And if content creators and media consumers would then even discover and dig into still rarely known and quite influential oligarchal organizations like the Council for National Policy,based in Washington D.C.,a powerhub for the right,conservative side of the power structure in the US and their influence over the republican party,Fox News but also many "alternative" media content creators,conservative activist groups and big evangelical churches, or La Cercle and even less known power hub for mostly rightwing continental and anglo-american politicians,businessmen or also intelligence assets etc. then many people would also receive a much more complete picture of the power structure and that a lot of the conservative opposition in the west has been widely subverted by elite interests..Council for National Policy..Funded in 1981 by the former evangelical preacher Tim Lahey and originally financed by Nelson Bunker Hunt,Nelson Rockefeller,the Unification Church aka Moon sect,the Coke and Coors,Regnery Family,among others. Members of the CNP were involved in the Iran-Contra affair,funding of Al-Quaida,and the PNAC document..Every republican presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan spoke in front of CNP members before getting nominated as candidate on the republican convention. Every head of the CNP with one exception was also member of the Knights of Malta. The CNP doesn't publish membership lists itself but lists were leaked and the CNP didn't deny the authenticity of the lists. To name a few famous former or current members of the CNP now..Mike Pence,Rudy Giuliani,Mike Pompeo,John Bolton,Steve Bannon.Michael Flynn,Erik Prince,Peter Thiel,Kenneth Blackwell,Betsy Devos,Tom Fitton(Judicial Watch),Oliver North(iran-Contra affair),Paul Craig Roberts,Richard deVos,Joseph Coors,Pierre du Pont,Jerry Falwell,Edwin Feulner(Heritage Foundation),Foster Friess(financed Turning Point USA with Charlie Kirk),Jesse Helms,Nelson Bunker Hunt,Herbert William Hunt,Jack Kamp,Tim Lahey,Larry McDonald(also John Birch Society),Edwin Meese the third,Charles Missler,Grover Norquist,Larry Pratt,Pat Robertson,Phyllis Schlafly,General John Singlaub(Iran-Contra affair,Cleon Skousen(Mormon mafia),Edward Teller(inventor of the neutron bomb),Richard Viguerie,Paul Weyrich etc...Here an introduction into the Council for National Policy..https://odysee.com/$/playlist/25243a889377da7f090077f599968d74241a063c. And here an introduction into "La Cercle". https://isgp-studies.com/le-cercle-pinay
Three solutions possible. Two are based on national sovereignty. One is globalist. Strong, direct by the people elected President or Chancellor. Popular votes. Weak or no parties. Members of parliament direct voted by the people.(When there is a parliament). Jugdes voted by the people or a random number generator. Militia courts. Civil society. National sovereignist. Than: Nationalsyndikalist Leadership and council. National sovereignist. Than: Fighting Spiritual. Kiborg inside of the Kiborg.Total totalitarianism. Total imperial Empire. Total connection/ annexation from all and total absorption from all and all and all dimensions. Mother Machine. All and all are and is connected. From eternity to eternity until all eternity, no outside anymore. Eternal pray, eternal meditation. Unremitting total Eucharist. All what will be produced is inside of the machine and all is in the machine. Ressources flowing in the machine. All over is centre. When there is a lot of ressources, people can choose, but not trade. That what is scarce will be gathered and allocated in the random number generator( for example dwellings,cells, combs). A kind of globalism.
Doesn't really matter if voting for a leader or people vote directly for specific politics if voting is fast and non compromised.
Must be possible to vote leaders out of office fast and easy. THAN we have democracy. As long as their theatre is in place we will only be spectators.
"The West will use CBDCs to usher in a totalitarian dystopia, while the digital ruble will be completely voluntary to use."
I'd be trading stocks and shares if I got a penny for every time someone justified an act of evil by suggesting the action was voluntary.
Trump shills would insist Operation Warp Speed wasn't evil because the poison shots were "voluntary" (ignore the fact it enabled the vaccine tyrants to begin with). Ignore the fact the "voluntary" effort was sustained by an absolute campaign of lies, deception, and fabricated evidence of "safe and effective" and "do it for grandma" and other nonsense.
Trudeau shills would insist forced euthanasia was acceptable because it was 'voluntary', ignore the fact they withheld healthcare from the sick and vulnerable, drove people into bankruptcy by seizing their funds and assets, and obliterated all sense of self-worth they had in the process.
Child murder shills would insist child murder is voluntary, a 'choice' to be made by the mother. Ignore the absolute darkness and apathy of moral spirit that must exist to offer such services in the first place.
Now I have to deal with the likes of Roper arguing 'voluntarism' for the centralised digital currencies. Tell me, would Roper accept death camps killing people if the entry was entirely voluntary? Offering lethal drugs to children? Hitman services are voluntary, does he endorse those?
I suppose his moral integrity is voluntary too.
I can recognize what Röper says as things I believed, or at least realistically (or so I thought) could hope to be true, as late as two years ago – about the supposedly politically leashed Russian oligarchs, even about the Russian vaccine with the cringe name, I’m embarrassed to say. (I hadn’t even heard of CBDCs back then, the good old days of the dystopian hellscape.)
Kind of like finding that old polyester leisure suit in the closet, it’s something I can only confess to among friends.
Globalists against multipolarists and national sovereignists.
But cross -fronts exists all over.
And yes, technocracy can exist national too.
But that is only theory: Where is a fight, a war? That is important.
You have to go in the organisation, into politics to enforce the civil liberties.
The frontline is not outside, inside is the fontline, inside of Putin' s administration.
May I inform the trusty souls who still believe in the goodness of "socially responsible enterpreneurs" from the Russian Federation that good ole' Klaus ran into some financial difficulties when he had to pretend that "the Russians are excluded from WEF", to the tune of 6-7 million, for it became known that 70% of his budget had come from those very "enterpreneurs"? The lying propagandists on the payroll have always known that, and still do, I suspect.
Why are modern moron slaves always trying to choose between shit and shit?! Is it because this is what we'll be in a near Future?!
As some random guy, who was censored away from Röpers site for pointing out Putin is a WEF member, I wanne say THANK YOU, SIR!
Same shithole everywhere. Don't eat the bugs, eat the rich.
I am sure you folks must have never heard of "the people's oligarchs" before!
Gas-lighting is a creative arts!
Good exposition, with which I certainly don't have any fundamental disagreement. Nevertheless, Putin came to power at the end of the turbulent 90s promising to LIMIT the power of the oligarchs, which up until that point had been practically absolute (Berezovsky, for example, clearly wielded a great deal more real power than the enfeebled Yeltsin at that point). Putin's pitch was, and remains, that he would be the ultimate arbiter of the inevitable squabbles (i.e. gang warfare) between ascending oligarchs. It doesn't often happen that he squashes a recalcitrant oligarch, but when he does, it is usually decisive. As someone who has been living in Russia for the last eight years, I think that this really is a major difference to the liberal west, where genuinely sovereign leaders are rarer than hen's teeth. The political culture is different too: most Russians genuinely couldn't care less about politics, since in any case, if there is a problem, it is up to Putin to fix it. For example, in my home city of Ekaterinburg, there was a stooshie when a local oligarch wanted to build a church in a popular city centre park. The local youth actually went out and protested, which is a very rare occurrence. The OMON were sent in, but within days Putin signalled that the church could very well be built elsewhere and that was the end of it. In the liberal west, on the other hand, everyone is frantically virtue-signalling their adherence to some or other absurd political posture, which makes zero difference to anyone's actual lives, which are entirely governed in the interests of the capital-owning classes.