Edward Slavsquat

Share this post
Yes, Russia is complicit in the Great Reset
edwardslavsquat.substack.com

Yes, Russia is complicit in the Great Reset

But if you disagree with me that's okay.

Edward Slavsquat
Apr 3, 2022
140
149
Share this post
Yes, Russia is complicit in the Great Reset
edwardslavsquat.substack.com
Different blocs are forming but they’re involved in the exact same scam: exploiting “public health”, “sustainability” and “security” to make life intolerable.

Hello friends.

I recently had the privilege of joining a panel discussion, "Russia & the Great Reset - Resistance or Complicity?", hosted by OffGuardian and Unlimited Hangout.

You can watch the debate here. Thank you to Kit Knightly and Whitney Webb for moderating. The event was inspired in part by James Corbett’s thought-provoking video on Russia and its relationship with the World Economic Forum.

An inevitable hurdle to any discussion like this is how to define the Great Reset, and what does it mean to be “complicit” in it?

Personally, I don’t think you can separate the Virus Scam from the Great Reset. As Herr Schwab famously declared, “the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.”

Did Russia take advantage of this “opportunity”? Of course it did. Russia used this phony “health crisis” to shred the social contract between government and citizens and pursue unprecedented digital surveillance and control over its population.

“Schoolchildren and teachers will be allowed into educational institutions only after they have passed biometric authentication. The plan states that this is necessary to ‘improve the personal safety of students and teaching staff on the territory of educational organizations in the city of Moscow.’” (Source)


Russia’s anti-human COVID policies destroyed countless businesses, caused severe disruptions to education, and deprived people of routine medical care. Amid the greatest socioeconomic catastrophe to befall Russia since the breakup of the Soviet Union, Sber and other large Russian companies partnered with the World Economic Forum to accelerate the country’s Fourth Industrial Revolution. The organization that hosts Russia’s Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (which still exists but has removed the WEF logo from its website), ANO Digital Economy, continues to list “WEF and international cooperation” as one of its main missions.

Edward Slavsquat
What awaits Russia?
One month ago your humble Moscow correspondent typed up an article titled, “Russia Is Rapidly Adopting QR Codes. How Does This End?”. In it, we argued the Russian government was using a “slow boil” strategy that would likely result in the same Vax Caste System being deployed across the world…
Read more
a year ago · 19 likes · 8 comments · Edward Slavsquat

Sanctions have forced the WEF to cut formal ties with Russia, but what does this “divorce” actually mean? Russia will still have a central bank digital currency, a facial recognition control grid, vaccine passports and genetic IDs. The social and economic “reset” is still on. It’s a Great Reset without the WEF logo.

The “special operation” in Ukraine is not a rebellion against Virus-inspired technocracy and biosecurity theater. Actually, we should expect new draconian controls and regimentation (in Russia and all over the world) in the name of public health, national security and economic stability. Because they really care about us.

Edward Slavsquat
The green checkmark that cares for all Russians
It’s a proven fact that economic conferences are massive snooze-fests where nothing of consequence is said or done; the “real talk” occurs in dimly lit rooms where central bankers and corporate monopolists smoke their sour apple vapes as they plot the global enslavement of every living creature and grain of sand. Tha…
Read more
a year ago · 28 likes · 26 comments · Edward Slavsquat

And of course, the COVID scamming continues without interruption. On April 1, Russia registered the “world’s first” intranasal vaccine based on an unproven genetic slurry; On March 30 it was announced that Russia and Kazakhstan will soon sign an agreement on the recognition of COVID vaccination passports; Alexander Gintsburg, the Anthony Fauci of Russia, recently revealed he would begin testing his unproven and unnecessary Sputnik-M shot on children aged 6-11. He also said Russian children should get revaccinated every six months. And so on. All of this is useless, depraved and anti-human.

Meanwhile, some of Russia’s leading technocrats and COVID scammers have been appointed to a newly formed commission tasked with protecting the country’s economy from western sanctions. Members of this committee include: clot-shot psychopath Tatyana Golikova, Dmitry Chernyshenko (the deputy prime minister who heads WEF-linked ANO Digital Economy), and Sergey Sobyanin, the man who wants to make Muscovites wear implantable devices that calculate health insurance payments.

As I argued during the panel discussion, I believe we are witnessing the formation of at least two distinct blocs that will use the same type of technocracy and biosecurity to make life intolerable.

bloc-based biosecurity theater

On March 22, TASS reported on the opening of the new BRICS Center for Research and Development of Vaccines, which will be used to “quickly respond to biological threats and ensure the protection of participating countries.”

Russian Health Minister Mikhail Murashko (who compared vaccine passports to a “new clothing style”) heaped praise on the new initiative.

“The first vaccines against COVID-19 were developed and tested precisely in the BRICS space, and this underlines how important it is to continue active work in this direction,” he said.

Sorry, but this isn’t reassuring. Especially if you are familiar with the Russian government’s close partnership with Big Pharma. Don’t forget: AstraZeneca and other friendly western drug companies have vowed to stay in Russia as the Kremlin takes on the globalists.

Edward Slavsquat
The Kremlin-Big Pharma alliance
By Riley Waggaman, a Moscow-based writer and former RT editor On July 17, 2020, Russian pharmaceutical company R-Pharm announced it would produce and supply a COVID vaccine that was under development by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford. Hailing the agreement, Alexey Repik, Chairman of the Board of Directors of R-Pharm…
Read more
a year ago · 29 likes · 31 comments · Edward Slavsquat

A final comment before I go get my Sputnik V nasal booster.

Tom Luongo apparently felt the need to admonish your humble Moscow correspondent and fellow panelist Iain Davis for expressing views that he doesn’t like:

In my opinion, they are the worst kind of useful idiots in a time like this, allowing their personal biases and, frankly, neuroses to dominate their public work which, in the end, does nothing more than carry water for the very people they are so completely afraid of.

Tom… why? Are you sure you want to lecture people about being “useful idiots” and allowing “personal biases” to “dominate their public work”? Are you sure you want to do this?

In a September 2020 podcast, Tom argued Sputnik V “represents a threat to the plans of The Davos Crowd to effect a Great Reset on the world through economic and social destruction… Instead of welcoming the vaccine, which is based on other safe and effective vaccines for MERS and Ebola, our political leadership are angry and embarrassing themselves with their ignorance and knee-jerk reactionism.”

What was Tom’s source for these airtight facts?

He cited an RT op-ed written by Kirill Dmitriev, a WEF Young Global Leader.

Tom, why????????????????

It’s a very bad op-ed, by the way. I inspected Dmitriev’s fanciful claims in an article published by the Brownstone Institute:

The Kremlin has batted away criticism of Sputnik V’s hypersonic development and rollout by highlighting the Gamaleya Center’s previous successes with developing viral vector vaccines.

For example, Kirill Dmitriev, the Harvard-educated ex-Goldman Sachs banker who heads the Russian Direct Investment Fund (which provides financing for Sputnik V), claimed in a September 2020 op-ed that “Russia has benefitted from modifying for COVID-19 an existing two-vector vaccine platform developed in 2015 for Ebola fever, which went through all phases of clinical trials and was used to help defeat the Ebola epidemic in Africa in 2017.”

Actually, only about 2,000 people in Guinea received Gamaleya’s Ebola vaccine in 2017-18 as part of a Phase III clinical trial. Typically, Phase III trials involve tens of thousands of participants and often require half a decade or more of meticulous data collection and monitoring. The modest scope of the trial was complemented by its very curious timing. Guinea was declared Ebola-free in June 2016 and remained that way for nearly five years. Contrary to Dmitriev’s creative prose, there was no Ebola epidemic in need of “defeating” when Gamaleya’s scientists arrived in Guinea in 2017 to begin small-scale tests of their experimental shot.

Gamaleya’s Ebola shot is currently only registered with Russia’s health ministry—which operates the institute. In a September interview with Forbes Russia, Inna Dolzhikova, who helped develop Sputnik V, argued there was no reason to seek international approval for Gamaleya’s Ebola vaccine because there have been no “large outbreaks” requiring inoculation against the deadly virus.

Not quite. Ebola re-emerged in Guinea in February of this year, prompting the African nation to undergo an emergency vaccination program. Gamaleya’s “proven” viral vector platform was conspicuously M.I.A.—suggesting its Ebola shot had hit a dead-end.

Before launching Sputnik V into orbit, Gamaleya repeatedly failed to send an approved drug beyond Russia’s own borders. The institute’s first attempt at a vector adenovirus vaccine, AdeVac-Flu, resulted in a multimillion-dollar embezzlement scandal. 

I’m sorry for being such a useful idiot, Tom. Going forward I promise to follow your example and get all my Sputnik V info from Russian propaganda written by the WEF-linked financier of Russia’s clot-shot.

— Riley

Edward Slavsquat
Sputnik V: It's what Klaus Schwab craves!
There appears to be growing consensus that Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum may not be a force for good. In fact, mounting evidence suggests Schwab and his protégées are responsible for a great deal of misery and general mischief all over the world…
Read more
a year ago · 36 likes · 62 comments · Edward Slavsquat
Edward Slavsquat
Sputnik V: What you're not being told
By now, the face-melting lies behind the Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca COVID “vaccines” have been thoroughly picked apart and exposed by the most respected voices in alternative media. However, many of these same truth-tellers give Sputnik V a free pass—or even vocally defend Russia’s shot. With a few notable exceptions, we do not attribute this phenom…
Read more
a year ago · 28 likes · 38 comments · Edward Slavsquat
149
Share this post
Yes, Russia is complicit in the Great Reset
edwardslavsquat.substack.com
149 Comments
Sirka Sie
Apr 3, 2022·edited Apr 3, 2022Liked by Edward Slavsquat

I wanted to watch the whole interview so badly but Tom is such an arrogant asshole I couldn’t. I am a huge fan of Ian’s work, he is thorough above and beyond and completely unbiased. He calls it as it IS, as do you. Perhaps I’m biased to towards you as it’s how I have seen this whole thing from watching and reading ALL KINDS of sources, Corbett, Webb, Fitts, Fuellmichs committee…I mean the list goes on. To NOT see the correlation between the Plandemic and the Great Reset and all that’s involved you must be blind. I’m not as articulate as most of your readers but I’m not stupid.

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
12 replies by Edward Slavsquat and others
Rob (of universe c137)
Writes Robert's Occam's razor
Apr 3, 2022·edited Apr 3, 2022Liked by Edward Slavsquat

You kicked ass on this discussion!

Matt confuses me, he was on the ball about the Covid being used to install the great reset, but then thinks that it can be done responsibly?

The issue is that there are people who think there's some sort of "responsible" use of this tech, forgetting that even with good intentions, manipulators love to embed themselves in order to hijack such technology.

And the even simpler point, you cannot defend any abrogation of rights, even if the goal is higher... Because this infects the lofty goal, just like religion started for good but ended up using their influence to get more power...

And the best place to question any and all vaccines is by going into the history of past pandemics and medicines. This paper alone explains that even deadly pandemics never showed transmission, which points the finger at other causes of the sickness, not the virus theory that needs transmission to work (and is absent)...

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/67902

It's enough to doubt that these leaders even have a clue of the reality, or as we think, it's just a way for them to become more authoritarian.

To believe in that they are good actors requires a lot of beliefs that excuse the obvious points. Occam's Razor shows that any one who is doing this technocratic shit is pretty much doing it for power.

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
18 replies
147 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Edward Slavsquat
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing