Btw - do you know what is more modern word for EUGENIC? TRANSHUMANISM - AGUMENTATION
Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley wrote in 1946: “Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible…
Btw - do you know what is more modern word for EUGENIC? TRANSHUMANISM - AGUMENTATION
Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley wrote in 1946: “Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Or, a longer quote:
"Biological inequality is, of course, the bedrock fact on which all of eugenics is predicated. But it is not usually realised that the two types of inequality have quite different and indeed contrary
eugenic implications. The inequality of mere difference is desirable, and the preservation of human variety should be one of the two primary aims of eugenics. But the inequality of level or standard is undesirable, and the other primary aim of eugenics should be the raising of the mean level of all desirable qualities. While there may be dispute over certain qualities, there can be none over a number of the most important, such as a healthy constitution, a high innate general intelligence, or a special aptitude such as that for mathematics or music.
At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilization is dysgenic instead of eugenic ; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable. "
"Still another and quite different type of borderline subject is that of eugenics. It has been on the borderline between the scientific and the unscientific, constantly in danger of becoming a pseudoscience based on preconceived political ideas or on assumptions of racial or class superiority and inferiority. It is, however, essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for? as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent ; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics. "
"Unesco, as has already been set forth, must deal with applied as well as pure science. It is worth pointing out that the applications. of science at once bring us up against social problems of various sorts. Some of these are direct and obvious. Thus the application of genetics in eugenics immediately raises the question of values what qualities should we desire to encourage in the human beings of the future ?
I can only recommend Julian Savulescu or my all time favourite, Parker Crutchfield of the "Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert" fame - you'll forget all about long-gone Huxleys at once, for those two and many more of them are are PhDs, they are extremely well-financed and very active, and they are working on their ideas for us right now, as we speak: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/
"Although this concept can also additionally mean totalitarian rule to many, ultimately, leveraging the IoVT era can be the maximum applicable manner to keep away from pandemics globally."
Btw - do you know what is more modern word for EUGENIC? TRANSHUMANISM - AGUMENTATION
Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley wrote in 1946: “Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Or, a longer quote:
"Biological inequality is, of course, the bedrock fact on which all of eugenics is predicated. But it is not usually realised that the two types of inequality have quite different and indeed contrary
eugenic implications. The inequality of mere difference is desirable, and the preservation of human variety should be one of the two primary aims of eugenics. But the inequality of level or standard is undesirable, and the other primary aim of eugenics should be the raising of the mean level of all desirable qualities. While there may be dispute over certain qualities, there can be none over a number of the most important, such as a healthy constitution, a high innate general intelligence, or a special aptitude such as that for mathematics or music.
At the moment, it is probable that the indirect effect of civilization is dysgenic instead of eugenic ; and in any case it seems likely that the dead weight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for Unesco to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable. "
"Still another and quite different type of borderline subject is that of eugenics. It has been on the borderline between the scientific and the unscientific, constantly in danger of becoming a pseudoscience based on preconceived political ideas or on assumptions of racial or class superiority and inferiority. It is, however, essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for? as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent ; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics. "
"Unesco, as has already been set forth, must deal with applied as well as pure science. It is worth pointing out that the applications. of science at once bring us up against social problems of various sorts. Some of these are direct and obvious. Thus the application of genetics in eugenics immediately raises the question of values what qualities should we desire to encourage in the human beings of the future ?
https://kritisches-netzwerk.de/sites/default/files/julian_huxley_-_unesco_-_its_purpose_and_its_philosophy_-_1946_-_60_pages.pdf
I can only recommend Julian Savulescu or my all time favourite, Parker Crutchfield of the "Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert" fame - you'll forget all about long-gone Huxleys at once, for those two and many more of them are are PhDs, they are extremely well-financed and very active, and they are working on their ideas for us right now, as we speak: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/
Exactly, it is all DONE for GREATER benefit, sorry:
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-5577/4/2/27/htm
"Although this concept can also additionally mean totalitarian rule to many, ultimately, leveraging the IoVT era can be the maximum applicable manner to keep away from pandemics globally."