It's becoming clearer and clearer that the "multipolar world order" is simply the next stage of the New World Order. Probably in order to accommodate China, which whatever you think of it is a massive industrial and economic power at this point. Beyond that, it's more or less the same - worshipping the triumvirate of the UN, WHO, WTO, moving forward with Agenda 2030, covid mania, "global governance" and so on.
"The parties intend to … promote a multipolar world order, economic globalization and democratization of international relations, promote the development of global governance in a more equitable and rational manner."
I almost got teary-eyed reading this. Such beautiful prose.
Thank you for this synopsis and your intent to let readers draw their own conclusion. All of the key boxes appear to have been are being checked: 2030, COVID-19, WHO, WTO, information exchange, low-carbon development ,and a generous use of the word "global".
They are even forging their own media bloc with an alliance of TASS and Xinhua. The plan is still on schedule.
It goes back to your original point about Ukraine and the SMO. Not just a diversion, after all.
Thank you I appreciate you laying out this information when 99% of the threads from the self-dubbed "geopolitical analysts" aren't doing anything but self immolating over the prospect of the US/West's power declining or pleasuring themselves over how good a BRICS led authoritarian biosecurity state makes them feel. A "Multipolar World Order" is still a world order building its surveillance state at the expense of people and the environment, man they can't even change up their diction enough to update the "global governance" terminology scheme.
"As a public service we’ve compiled The Agreements. No editorializing. Just the hard facts here at E. Slavsquat."
Edward Slavsquat is the last old-school reporter. Who?, what?, where?, when?, why?, and WTF?, are what you get in a good Slavsquat reported piece, and that's a valuable service.
Am I misunderstanding, or is Article # 8 a rejection of the WHO's attempt to accrete unto itself the sole authority to determine pandemics/treatments etc. overriding all sovereign governments? The Russia/China agreement states:-
" .......and will jointly oppose attempts at the platforms of international organizations to adopt legally binding mechanisms that LIMIT THE SOVEREIGNTY OF COUNTRIES in the field of prevention and control of infectious diseases ......"
- which suggests not totally kowtowing to the WHO etc.
"promote the development of global governance in a more equitable and rational manner.”
- Translation: global government yes, but we want more control in it.
"strengthen the relevant work within the framework of such multilateral platforms as WHO, BRICS, SCO, G20, APEC.”
- Translation: We want more involvement into Globalist's Mafia.
"...will jointly contribute to the success of the UN Summit on Sustainable Development Goals, ensuring the early implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
- Translation: We will actively support the enslavement agenda.
Not a single word about real democracy, nothing about people's rights or people's will. They only want to have a bigger share in the people's rip off and openly support the Globalist enslavement Agenda.
So "we're going to embrace Globohomo while we're not embracing Globohomo." As soon as "sustainable development" comes into the talk, one should smell a rat.
I had held out hopes of seeing something concrete to challenge the West but nah, they just want a seat at the table.
NATO and the sino-russian block both contribute to the bipolarization of the world. All along the centuries, Rothschild's interactions between China and the west, thanks to western corrupted governants, then China in the WTO, Covid, war, France resignation in the Sahel, both orchestrated the weakening of western powers to benefit to China.
anymore evident that China/Russia are all-in on the WHO, WEF, EU,
2030 Sustainability Agenda which views humans as unscrubbed rageful beasts who need to be relentlessly monitored in order to prevent transmission of "unfavorable ideology" among ungrateful proles who are discontent about complying with the policies within a technocratic neofeudal biosecurity state.
Damn it, Riley, we were counting on Xi, Putin and the rest of the BRICS bloc to save us. And now you're telling us that they are about .... implementing the Great Reset too, even if with a bit of editing of the script? Damn it, there go our dreams, broken in the dust again. :-)
Thanks! I hope you are puncturing some of the silliness balloons, you'd think from reading some of the commentators and analysts that they are inhaling from nitrous balloons.
I Totally Agree ! I support this world event Agreement between Russia and China completely, which is based on cooperation and mutual respect between countries, as opposed to the past ten decades of hegemony and secretly planned terrorist regime changes against any countries that do not agree with such hegemony. This approach will save many lives in the future. No country should threaten another country into submission using lies, propaganda, violence of regime change and terrorism. That is unacceptable in our future if we want our civilization to survive. Healthier minds need to prevail against insane minds and stupidity.
It's becoming clearer and clearer that the "multipolar world order" is simply the next stage of the New World Order. Probably in order to accommodate China, which whatever you think of it is a massive industrial and economic power at this point. Beyond that, it's more or less the same - worshipping the triumvirate of the UN, WHO, WTO, moving forward with Agenda 2030, covid mania, "global governance" and so on.
"The parties intend to … promote a multipolar world order, economic globalization and democratization of international relations, promote the development of global governance in a more equitable and rational manner."
I almost got teary-eyed reading this. Such beautiful prose.
Thank you for this synopsis and your intent to let readers draw their own conclusion. All of the key boxes appear to have been are being checked: 2030, COVID-19, WHO, WTO, information exchange, low-carbon development ,and a generous use of the word "global".
They are even forging their own media bloc with an alliance of TASS and Xinhua. The plan is still on schedule.
It goes back to your original point about Ukraine and the SMO. Not just a diversion, after all.
Thank you I appreciate you laying out this information when 99% of the threads from the self-dubbed "geopolitical analysts" aren't doing anything but self immolating over the prospect of the US/West's power declining or pleasuring themselves over how good a BRICS led authoritarian biosecurity state makes them feel. A "Multipolar World Order" is still a world order building its surveillance state at the expense of people and the environment, man they can't even change up their diction enough to update the "global governance" terminology scheme.
Mr.Slavsquat wrote:
"As a public service we’ve compiled The Agreements. No editorializing. Just the hard facts here at E. Slavsquat."
Edward Slavsquat is the last old-school reporter. Who?, what?, where?, when?, why?, and WTF?, are what you get in a good Slavsquat reported piece, and that's a valuable service.
Am I misunderstanding, or is Article # 8 a rejection of the WHO's attempt to accrete unto itself the sole authority to determine pandemics/treatments etc. overriding all sovereign governments? The Russia/China agreement states:-
" .......and will jointly oppose attempts at the platforms of international organizations to adopt legally binding mechanisms that LIMIT THE SOVEREIGNTY OF COUNTRIES in the field of prevention and control of infectious diseases ......"
- which suggests not totally kowtowing to the WHO etc.
Some parts make me cringe:
"promote the development of global governance in a more equitable and rational manner.”
- Translation: global government yes, but we want more control in it.
"strengthen the relevant work within the framework of such multilateral platforms as WHO, BRICS, SCO, G20, APEC.”
- Translation: We want more involvement into Globalist's Mafia.
"...will jointly contribute to the success of the UN Summit on Sustainable Development Goals, ensuring the early implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
- Translation: We will actively support the enslavement agenda.
Not a single word about real democracy, nothing about people's rights or people's will. They only want to have a bigger share in the people's rip off and openly support the Globalist enslavement Agenda.
So helpful! Thank you! Would love to see your comments!
Excellent summary
Thank you very much for working your way through this document
Thank you. Very helpful.
So "we're going to embrace Globohomo while we're not embracing Globohomo." As soon as "sustainable development" comes into the talk, one should smell a rat.
I had held out hopes of seeing something concrete to challenge the West but nah, they just want a seat at the table.
NATO and the sino-russian block both contribute to the bipolarization of the world. All along the centuries, Rothschild's interactions between China and the west, thanks to western corrupted governants, then China in the WTO, Covid, war, France resignation in the Sahel, both orchestrated the weakening of western powers to benefit to China.
I don't think it can be
anymore evident that China/Russia are all-in on the WHO, WEF, EU,
2030 Sustainability Agenda which views humans as unscrubbed rageful beasts who need to be relentlessly monitored in order to prevent transmission of "unfavorable ideology" among ungrateful proles who are discontent about complying with the policies within a technocratic neofeudal biosecurity state.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://is.muni.cz/th/mscxq/Gardas_Thesis.pdf%3Fkod%3DBi6888%3Blang%3Den&ved=2ahUKEwjpv-jwvvf9AhVDqZUCHZxSBMsQFnoECAwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2wqAHPqbNiHAL1Y0VVzKLa
Damn it, Riley, we were counting on Xi, Putin and the rest of the BRICS bloc to save us. And now you're telling us that they are about .... implementing the Great Reset too, even if with a bit of editing of the script? Damn it, there go our dreams, broken in the dust again. :-)
Thanks! I hope you are puncturing some of the silliness balloons, you'd think from reading some of the commentators and analysts that they are inhaling from nitrous balloons.
I Totally Agree ! I support this world event Agreement between Russia and China completely, which is based on cooperation and mutual respect between countries, as opposed to the past ten decades of hegemony and secretly planned terrorist regime changes against any countries that do not agree with such hegemony. This approach will save many lives in the future. No country should threaten another country into submission using lies, propaganda, violence of regime change and terrorism. That is unacceptable in our future if we want our civilization to survive. Healthier minds need to prevail against insane minds and stupidity.
You have outdone yourself.
Putin and Xi’s own PPP!
“Let us first create the circumstances.” ~ Xi Jingping to Justin Trudeau who spilled some beans.
And then … we will be happy.